Why do people get so mad at Rotten Tomatoes when it's just a review aggregator?

Why do people get so mad at Rotten Tomatoes when it's just a review aggregator?

Because they didn't give the score I wanted to the movie was looking at

Because there are reviewers who gave Suicide Squad a bad review mainly for its sexual and adult themes... the hell? Why does everything have to be so PG related nowadays...

How does that befall on Rotten Tomatoes at all, you fucking retard?

for example, Joker tries to get Harley to sleep with a black guy. Before this you see Harley dancing in a sexual manner on a pole in a club. Yeah so what? DC is meant to be mature and not kiddy watered down.

um because the reviewer gave it a bad review, his review is then counted as a negative on RT... are you dumb?

Because it's all part of a ponzi scheme
>Disney bribes RT
>RT bribes critics
>critics give bad reviews to DC films
>normies go watch Marvel flicks instead
>Disney easily makes back their money gifts

Why are plebs pretending to care about film criticism now?

For years you iqlets called Brody and White pretentious and anyone that agreed with them hipsters. Has your taste film improved now or are you still the tasteless drones you were when you cried hipster and that fun should be allowed since film is supposed to be """entertainment"""

or is this another excuse to shitpost and stay away from developing better taste again?

>Why are plebs pretending to care about film criticism now?
Honestly I never cared for criticism back in the late 90's and early 2000's when I never had the internet to look at what people constantly said about movies I enjoyed.

But now with the internet, its so hard not to go to a site like RT.

their featured reviewers often seem sjw oriented

They need to do something with their impotent rage.

>normies go watch Marvel flicks instead
Yeah, that's why SS is flopping right now, huh?

Maybe because people post the shit out of it.

It was better when 2 thumbs up was enough and people made up their own minds mostly. Now it's this or nothing. And a huge percentage of critics are justt fucking clowns. SJWs or worse who ust can't into anything but their lame leanings at all times.

This. For instance read this review of Suicide Squad:

>For here we have a motion picture in which a new incarnation of the classic Batman villain the Joker – essayed by Jared Leto as a kind of Halloween-themed version of Rik Mayall’s Richie, from the Nineties BBC sitcom Bottom – slurpingly offers up a sexual encounter with his girlfriend-stroke-protégé Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie) to a fellow career crook as a kind of underworld bargaining chip.

>Here is a comic-book adaptation in which Batman (Ben Affleck) himself – one of the most universally beloved superheroes ever created – hauls Harley from the Gotham River, gives her creepily insistent mouth-to-mouth, then immediately pins her down by the throat, erotic asphyxia-style, when she comes around.

>Here is a film in which model-turned-actress Cara Delevingne gives not only a personal worst performance, but something close to a former-profession-worst performance, as a gyrating, bikini-clad villainess called Enchantress, who kisses men full on the lips to turn them into her slaves (of course!) and talks like Vanessa Redgrave on rhinoceros tranquiliser.

The critic didn't bother commenting on all the different personalities of each of the Squad members and how well Deadshot was, Diablo's backstory but instead focused on the sexual adult content which he didn't like... are critics that idiotic to hate anything adult related?

Its making bank because it has the same reddit pandering meme marketing deadpool did

Good lord. And people pay these people. And then people pay these people mind. Fucks sake.

anons take the webs too seriously, because they've pretended it's their universe so long...they start to believe it.

Because half the people here are fucking retarded

Because RT is a meme

RT does hold some responsibility for who it labels as "top critics", though. Buzzfeed and MTV are absolutely not top critics, not even by RT's very own standards, and yet they are some of the many unqualified review sites that get top placement as the best of the best critics. Somehow.

RT is deranged and obviously pulls together reviews in such a way as to push forward their narratives. They also decide the Fresh or Rotten designator of individual reviews, so sometimes a 3/4 is still "Rotten" and 2/4 sometimes "Fresh" because they push forward the "right" agenda.

RT has always been garbage and it will continue to be so.

>or is this another excuse to shitpost and stay away from developing better taste again?
yes

Because a lot of people rely on it too much while not knowing how it actually works, and it's useless in general

Plus, they there is no serious vetting in who they pick in their critics. I assume a lot of them barely have any credentials to be taken as an authority on movies

Owned by Fandango. Fandango wants to sell movie tickets. It's bad for their business to have low scores for movies. Especially blockbusters.

The other owner of Rotten Tomatoes is Warner Brothers.

Yeah Rotten Tomatoes is totally biased towards DC kek.
Maybe you have to accept the fact that these movies are actually shit.

See

You dumb retard

>Maybe you have to accept the fact that these movies are actually shit.
Doesn't prove critics aren't shit though. The majority really are.

RT is a piece of shit. They actually include reviewers from blogs and literal who newspapers.

If you use this shit you need to be euthanized.

Because people are too lazy/stupid to read the reviews and need to rely on an aggregate to tell them what to think. Some of the RT """critics""" are fucking morons, but there are plenty of legitimate reviewers whose opinions can be heard via RT.

Metacritic is better and more accurate in my experience.