Rebels did this chemical attack

Rebels did this chemical attack
This is was US-aimed provocation
And US swallow

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=qmA1g5pLWOs
takeoverworld.info/Grand_Chessboard.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

op thinks there's a conspiracy?

>And US swallow

you deleted the other thread to use more equally clumsy broken english?

so... are you going to try to start actual conversation or are you just shilling pre-generated propaganda images?

I asked myself that same question op . Then i realized of the 4 chemical attacks assad has been accused of he is guilty of 3 . Not to mention he uses chlorine gas like its a fashion statement . To ghe commen tt of gassing his own people you have to point out that sunie and shite muslims want to eradicate each other at all cost. If assad didnt do it why did he bomb the hospital treating the victims? Why did they spend a day bombing a vacante village if the evidence would have vindicated him? No he did it , trump knows it , putin knows it , assad knows it. If assad didnt do it russia would be acting more aggressive towards thd u.s. strike . Assad used the gas because he though he could get away with it. Russia should tread carefully , they are out gunned in every aspect against the murica .

...

come on, OP, if you're trying to help people get woke you have to actually communicate with people. otherwise, you kinda look like one of those troll farm faggots.

youtube.com/watch?v=qmA1g5pLWOs

yes,
nice quads

It's just another power play, Assad has no tactical advantage to gas anyone when his army is already winning.

Gasing his own population would cause unneeded stresses and more issues than it fixes.

This was just a move by our government to give an excuse and keep Russia from getting comfortable in Syria, and doing this to help the Kurds who are fighting multiple fronts.

>sunie and shite muslims want to eradicate each other at all cost

not really

>they are out gunned in every aspect against the murica

Pride always shows before a fall

this is is whats going to fuck us in the end everyone is all "Can't fuck with 'murica"

Russia is literately waving its left hand with it's one destroyer while America stares at it an laughs unaware they're about to get a fucking right hook

Checked.

You must be delusional. Russia has what like 3 aircraft carriers to u.s. 20+ or maybe your thinking russias 300 or so 3rd generation fighters can hold off muricas 3000+. If this wasnt true putin would have sunk the destroyer that launched the cruise missles. We literally bombed a base housing 100 or so russians and putin just turned his phone off lol

care to elaborate on this theory?

The truth is out there

One. Russia has only one carrier.

because he believes that by punishing neighborhoods that harbor rebels, he will make those groups of people turn on rebels.

>"oh we are gonna bomb these area's indiscriminatly if you don't help push them out" says assad
>"Get out of our neihborhood! we will be bombed!" he thinks the people will say to rebels
>What he doesn't realize is people still recognize who drops the bombs.
>as time goes on he gets more indiscriminate.. punishing them more, failing to realize that he is dealing with adults defending what they feel is life and freedom, and not children wanting more playtime.

A better question is why the US is doing anything in Syria.

Our foreign policy in the Middle East for the last 70 years is totally fucked up.

PROOF! I WANT PROOF! HARD EVIDENCE! NOW! PROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOF!!!!!!

You really don't know what the fuck you're talking about, OP, so perhaps you should stop acting like it.

Let's face it, people are only accepting """evidence""" that corresponds to their bullshit political allegiances these days. I suppose it's always been that way, but the partisan bullshit/disinformation is out of control.

Speculation is mostly a pointless waste of time, but I don't think it's wise to give a brutal dictator who's been slaughtering innocent civilians for 6 years the benefit of the doubt.

again keep focusing on that lil area of ocean. A handful of shit stained towel heads crippled the country with a few stolen planes. And pound for pound russians are some tough fuckers their training makes ours look like summer camp

remember when GWB labelled syria as part of the axis of evil, along with iraq, iran and north korea? just sayin, but each of those countries territory pushes the line closer to russia's actual border.

us middle eastern policy is about supremacy in eurasia.

It was Assad you autistic faggot fuck.

none of that matters at all dubya dubya tree is all gonna be bout who can shoot down nukes the fastest

as an american i have heard this story before.... middle east country with WMD's and we have to attack before they kill us all..... fuck i have heard this as many times as is have seen a star wars movie with a death star

in reply to the OP pic: because sandniggers are fucking dumb and violent, that's why

the middle east isnt exactly the paragon of reason and virtue in case you haven't noticed, though judging by your engrish you're probably a camelfucker yourself

Ive trained for this my entire life

1. This was a fairly measured response to an international war crime, not a full-scale invasion.
2. Just because our intelligence agencies have fucked up in the past doesn't mean they're completely incompetent and illigitimate

It's also worth noting that many CIA officials thought the evidence of WMD's was dubious. Oh, and it's not the same people in charge.

Those dead kids were yelling allah akbar the day before the strike and supporting with their families terrorists, fuck em..

first of all - Assad have NO chemical weapons

>brutal dictator who's been slaughtering innocent civilians

yeah, how about "innocent rebels" slaughtering innocent Assad ?

kek

No it wasn't. The US had zero authorization to go in there and bomb anyone.

This needs to be a 100% UN operation or the US will once again by the scapegoat nation that ends up getting attacked.

also bombing the chemical weapons wielder earns srs goodguy points. convenient, eh?

Obviously he does.

Why do you believe what a dictator says?

his numbers are tanking hardcore, he doesn't have time to mess around waiting for hanz blix

Yeah I agree. Trump is a fuckup.
Just saying the only way we're going to get shit straight in Syria is with an international coalition.

Crippled? I don't think that did anything more than unite and piss everyone off. Murcia was ready to fight and didn't even care who. Truth is it took trump less than a day to put together a plan and follow through with 60 cruise missiles that cost 1.5 mill a piece . Putin literally turned off his phone. Trump should push a little more , I stall safe zone with no fly and let the Israelis fighters patrol the no fly zone e. Russia isn't even on the same level as u.s. . The stealth is still the most advanced aircraft in the air and it's like 40 years old.

>innocent Assad

>the US had zero authorization
Then why isn't the UN pitching a bitchfit? In fact they all seem to support it.

Gtfo, faggot.

How does a government winning a war, who has a maintaned a decently advanced weapons stockpile and military for decades NOT have weapons that require a high level of effort and industry for production.. but some rebels living out of people's basements with an arsenal consisting of AK-s and Toyota's do?

this entire thing was an attempt to discredit the Trump/Putin connection. what convinced me was the childish reaction from Russia after the bombing. Russia is not fucking stupid enough to threaten the U.S. and that's exactly what they did.

>Why use them on civilians ?
bc Assad is a paranoid sociopath.

oh man so much pride...the more unwarranted attacks we make, the more we shove our dicks in other peoples business, the world's losing support for america's bullying

Russia has China, Iran, and India not counting the smaller ones and they all can stand on their own

America has a bunch of tit sucking crybabies that whine for us to settle shit for them

because we would take away their allowance

This

Also, he probably wanted to test Trump and his gaggle of buffoons, and if they decided not to act, it would be a big win for 2 main reasons: 1. He'd know that he can get away with anything. 2. It would completely demoralize the rebels who are looking to the US for help.

If you're really interested, try look up "Rojava" and ask yourself why it isn't covered by MSM, recognized by any western country or even invited to Geneva peace talks.

Then ask yourself why Turkey, a founding member of NATO, is supporting ISIS against Rojava, with all western countries being aware of this.

you guys are retards. Russia doesn't give a shit about Assad and without Russia any reason for the U.S. to go to war with Assad is suicide for him.

oh man such a lack of understanding for global economics... All countries aforementioned have ZERO chance of even funding a campaign. Even if they had the balls to stand up to us, put simply- we'd outspend them. We're going to stay bullying the world for a long while, kid.

You're wrong. Look up what Russia and China have vetoed several times during the conflict. Hint: It's about Assad.

Yea soon as we ask China for another loan

That's so fucking dumb my eyes hurt.

>Russia doesn't give a shirt about Assad
Their efforts in the region would suggest otherwise.

>any reason for the US to go to war
I dont think he believed a chemical weapons attack would inspire the US to put any substantial effort into this conflict. And as it stands, if that was his presumption, it looks like he would've been correct.

It's been a fucking disaster for 70 years and it cuts across multiple administration's and parties.

Fyi: I'm an American and I hate both parties

propping up some puppet != caring about that puppet

>I dont think he believed a chemical weapons attack would inspire the US to put any substantial effort into this conflict.

I don't think so either considering he didn't actually order it.

compelling infograph

except killing civilians have been Assad's MO from the get-go

He probably just underestimated Trump's grasp on geo-politics

Lmaooo
Debt to other countries is irrelevant, our financial policies control the world.
Plus our tangible assets will always be arms.

but where do rebels getting these AKs ?
Their hidden master provided to them these death chemicals
this is obvious

>Their efforts in the region would suggest otherwise.

I can't believe I'm posting this shit for the mouthbreathers on Sup Forums.

Russia doesn't want an oil pipeline built through Syria to supply Europe as oil exports are fairly important to Russia. Putin doesn't give two shits about Assad or Syria, he just doesn't want the EU to have an easy source of oil that isn't Russia.

>And US swallow


the poor grammar, blaming US

PROPAGANDA STRAIGHT FROM THE SYRIAN MINISTRY

TRUMP DID POO POO

and US swallow

THIS

russia signed some huge arms deals with syria in 2005, eliminating most of their debt to the former soviet union in exchange for buying loads of weapons. they also have energy deals.

it's actually public knowledge.

Dude just a force of Russia and China would fuck America up but if Putin can convince China and India to work together the combined coalition wouldn't even have to flex

If you are at War with relevant nations and not with some sandnoggs your finances means nothing
You outsourced so many jobs the US can't stand on its own at this point

I don;t care and I don't know why you do either. They are muslims. They are vermin. They all need to die. Doesn't matter if it is gas or missiles, kill em all.

Don't give a shit who did it, I only care that Trump is trying to divert attention away from the fact he's committing treason.

why waste money on things you don't care about? missles aren't cheap. nice dubs though faggot.

Because erdogan wants lifespace in the East

This thread tho.

Convincing China and India to work together is like asking fuel and fire to play nice.

Fucking retard.

seems, like
>Assad have cheated on Russia
no, its not
/thread

Implying those two nations combined and unencumbered have even a slight extent over what we have constructed militarily preludes to how little you understand the scope of this topic. I take it you have never been to India, they are literally still in the dark ages outside of substantial metro zones, population doesn't mean a thing when your country is underfed.

Again as previously stated, finances mean EVERYTHING and we have incomprehensible assets.

...

If you havent realised yet, the UN is a powerless organisation. They couldnt even pass a vote to launch an investigation into the gas attack, AN INVESTIGATION! Its a joke because russia and china just veto everything

And it's being repaired

Finances have no inherent worth
Why can't you Americans understand this?
The value of money is what you can do with it and that's not much when you are at War with the nation's you are importing from

You really have no grasp on the comparison of these military forces. China , Russia, India, Iran don't even have a combined total of 5 aircraft carriers . Every year we outspent all of these countries combined and have been since ww2 . And don't forget Russia used to be the Soviet union . They lost almost everything trying to just keep up

Finances mean power though.

So yes it has everything to do with it.

Money means jack shit, When the US can't even subdue a shithole nation like Iraq or Afghanistan.

for anybody's edification regarding seemingly incomprehensible U.S. foreign policy decisions over the last number of decades, The Grand Chessboard, by Zbigniew Brzezinski. this book can provide some insight.

takeoverworld.info/Grand_Chessboard.pdf

Lmao! go ahead and google the top nations by military might

If you think Russia can take the US you are delusional.

holy fuck i laughed far too hard at that. I am a monster

"Finances have no inherent worth"

Are you writing this from a fucking tent?
Again I say, what we have done with money has EVERYTHING to do with it. And just to be clear aside from a few commodities what exactly are we importing from any of those nations we can not obtain from anywhere else or produce here? Minerals? Precious metals? Oil? Gold?

Let me ask you this user, where are you from?

Finances only means power when you can buy stuff with it
Everything in your culture is so centered around money you really seem to have forgotten that real value comes from usability, not from a paper with "I am worth much" written over it

The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th most power nations

Yes, and that means supporting the Assad regime, you fucking moron.

Learn2nuance

Pretty sure Mexico, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, South Korea, and Japan would be happy to pick up China's slack....lol your full blown retard

what is the petro dollar?

Do you really think in case of war any tradeships would get through?
These things are gigantic, slow and easy to spot, no match for modern weaponry

Lmao horrible summation to the discussion.

American military > global military. No one even comes close, beyond WWII we have run the field in might, and that's just facts. We can argue that ALL DAY.

as proven by our perfect military track record

The West
>topples multi-ethnic empires and paves the way for brutal communism (World War 1)

The West
>Forces dire economic restraints on the Wiemar Republic creating a hot bed for National Socialism to flourish in German (Treat of Versailles)

The West
>Does oil deal with Ottoman empire, then fucks off with the oil leaving middle east in disarray (World War 1)

The West
>How do I stop North Korea without fucking up the entire continent? I can't

The West
>North Vietnamese need a good gassing!

The West
>Saddam has WMDs promise!

Worth nothing in case of war
Kek

it provides the armaments used in the war you're talking about. the fuck dude?

"Real value" in your argument implies financial powers don't maintain prowess over feelings.
If I had time to deliver /b a class on economics, I would help you understand. Your feelings don't have value, and neither does whatever ism you believe in when capitalism rules the world - hence why whatever country you are in is currently contracting.

>WWI
US 'passenger' ship gets torpedoed by Jerry off Ireland. Ship had munitions bound for England as well as passengers on board. US enters WW1 with strong public support.

>WWII
Japan attacks Pearl Harbour. Primary target is the US carriers. They aren't home and no one notices a cubic buttload of Jap planes until the bombs drop. US officially enters WWII with strong public support.

> Korea
Muh Communism!! Started with some support but didn't last long.

> Vietnam
Muh communist domino effect. Started with strong support, but rapidly waned.

> Desert Storm 1+2
US goes in to preserve freedom of minor nation from evil dictator. Strong public support and minor losses. Dictator and minor nation happen to have large reserves of oil.

> Afghanistan
Twin towers get hit by planes. Pentagon gets hit by plane. US mobilizes forces and general public supports war.

> Syria
Gas attack.
???
Profit

I'm seeing a pattern here.

...

The mods deleted this thread im betting.

>on the verge of winning the war

ha
but rebels have been gaining so much territory lately?