Why can't the rest of the world be low-crime, technologically advanced, free healthcare, economically developed...

Why can't the rest of the world be low-crime, technologically advanced, free healthcare, economically developed, well educated, nature friendly, organized, stable, wealthy, prosperous, peaceful, democratic, free, liberal, altruistic and polite, like the countries of West Europe?

How is it possible for the entire world to achieve the same level of integrity as West Europe?

>integrity
>brexit

i am going to break each of those items into a questions, hold up white i answer them

Rude!

...

>democratic
>Europe in 2017

I'm not just memeing, your governmental system has severe democratic deficits in terms of who writes laws, who introduces laws, what elected persons can do to refine/prevent those laws from passing, and how the EU continuously skirts around referendums of various sorts.

You're living in a bureaucracy.

>like the countries of West Europe?
like the countries of West Europe and Japan?

Gib money

Yes.
Aus, Nz and Canada count too.

>hold up white i answer them

Holy Freudian-slip, Batman!

delet this we are a proud race of asian-maori warriors

>free
>low crime
>peaceful
lol, good one hans

Don't forget US. We are part of Western culture

t. zheng the emuborne

You're far from being low-crime, free healthcare, well educated, nature friendly, organized, peaceful, altruistic and polite.

>low-crime
high wealth, generally okay distribution of technology
>technologically advanced
governmental incentives actually, high taxes
>free healthcare
same as above
>economically developed
globalized top feeder tend to have this effect
>well educated
see technology and healthcare
>nature friendly
but ecologically negative, "nature" to case a veil over the destructive tendencies of western markets
>organized
-
>stable
having large bourgeoisie class helps
>wealthy
see economically developed
or rather it's like wealth distribution
>prosperous
same as wealth
>peaceful
after starting the most violent wars in the history of man
>democratic
to maintain wealth
>free
nothing is free
>liberal
as a totalitarian ideology
>altruistic
which compounds the problem
>and polite
empirically negative
>How is it possible for the entire world to achieve the same level of integrity as West Europe?
by killing people by the millions after a few decades they will achieve this

So are most of the countries you listed considering that their CO2 production per capita is among the highest In the world

Wrong!

West yorop suck dicks.

CO2 has little to do with being nature friendly. Why is it that Japan is perhaps the cleanest country in the world and China, the dirtiest, when Japan has a lower per capita consumption of CO2 than China?
Ok I'll give you that :^)

*when Japan has a higher per capita consumption of CO2 than China
I should be sleeping

shouldn't you be off praying to Allah?

Yes, you should wagie.

this

Just glancing at an EU a parliament session should show you that it isn't any of those things.

But I'll bite and give you a (You) OP, because the image you posted is of best girl.

>Why can't the rest of the world be low-crime, technologically advanced, free healthcare, economically developed, well educated, nature friendly, organized, stable, wealthy, prosperous, peaceful, democratic, free, liberal, altruistic and polite, like the countries of West Europe?
Because someone has to give profit, cheap commodities and cheap labour to those companies that sustain your development

>A popular rebuttal is to invoke the socialist leanings of several European countries with high living standards, especially in Scandinavia. Why can’t America be more like happy Denmark, with its high taxes and giant public sector, or at least more like France? Even the more pro-free-market United Kingdom has national health care, after all. First off, comparing relatively small, homogeneous populations to the churning, ocean-spanning American giant is rarely useful. And even the most socialist of the European countries only became wealthy enough to embrace redistribution after free-market success made them rich. Still, why cannot America follow this path if that is what the people want? What is the problem if American voters are willing to accept higher taxes in exchange for greater security in the embrace of the government?
>The answer takes us back to all those inventions America has produced decade after decade. As long as Europe had America taking risks, investing ambitiously, attracting the world’s dreamers and entrepreneurs, and yes, being unequal, it could benefit from the results without making the same sacrifices. Add to that the incalculable windfall of not having to spend on national defense thanks to America’s massive investment in a global security umbrella. America doesn’t have the same luxury of coasting on the ambition and sacrifice of another country.
>Who will be America’s America? What other nation could attract the brightest students, the biggest investors, the most ambitious entrepreneurs in the same way? Germany? Russia? Japan? China? India? Each may take over leadership in some areas if America continues to falter, but none is equipped to lead the world in innovation the way the United States has since Thomas Edison’s day. None possesses the combination of political and economic freedoms and the human and natural resources required.

...

...

In pursuit of world's equality, God have presented IS, rapefugee and extremists to W.Europe.