Honest question how is shadbase's art not illegal...

Honest question how is shadbase's art not illegal? Like I know he says they're all +18 but I feel like it puts you on a watchlist.

Because drawn shit tends not to equal actual shit in most countries.

Think of it this way, would you rather a pedo rid his sexual lust on fake images or be crazed by it until he acts on it. That's why most countries are thinking keeping it legal.

Are keeping it legal. What the fuck, I went a little retardo there.

...

The point I made... No, the retarded grammar, also no.

It's the actual reason, look it up.

Were can I get more of this.

Well, he said the sites name, if you're to stupid to find it then you don't deserve it.

I thought it was down.

I thought you were downs also

Bitch, you thought

I can't tie my shoes but I can fuck youre bicth

I stopped visiting Shadbase a long time ago.
Now, all he draws is fucking Loli, calls is "Smoli" and says its legit.

Fuck that guy, he has no friggin respect.

He's gay but still makes lolis

He used to draw a lot more sexy shit. Big titty bitches and futa and shit.

Now it's all loli and it's not that I'm afraid of getting v& or anything, but I just don't find children sexy.

Anyway, I think its a bummer because say what you want about his art, no one updates at the rate he does with a level of quality consistency. Bummer.

>how is shadbase's art not illegal?
>how is art not illegal?
freedom of expression?

What the shit... No...

except US, Canada, England, Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany, Italy, Greece, South Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, South America, Mexico and the Vatican State. drawn shit doesn't equal actual shit but posting JB will get your ass canned in all of those countries.

you think otherwise? post refs to actual online law libraries that say you can post pics of little kids getting fucked. go on. we'll just wait here.

Freedom of expression does not extend to your right to draw pics of kids getting fucked. if you don't agree, then head over to your local police station and politely ask them. they'll be glad to explain it to you.

Nah I'd rather just look up the law in my comfy chair...hey look! It does give you that right, well ill be darned.

you didn't post a reference we can access, so you are talking out of your asshole. either that, or you live in Japan, North Korea, Zimbabwe or the Seychelles Islands.

>Drawings=Reality
You guys are fucking retarded (implying is not the same guy), in the most part of America Loli is just an aggravating if you are found with the real thing

I live in the fucking U.S. M8. the law is
"By its own terms, the law does not make all simulated child pornography illegal, only that found to be obscene or lacking in serious value. And mere possession of said images is not a violation of the law unless it can be proven that they were transmitted through a common carrier."

Because in the united states, loli isn't federally illegal and bluntly, the FBI/CIA/NSA/Police have better shit to do than go after a bunch of neckbeards fapping to drawings.

because, you know, drawings aren't people, and just like violent video games don't make people into belligerent murderers, underage characters in sexual situations don't make people criminal pedophiles.

exactly it is literally some lines on paper that i could draw right now. its retarded.

I understand why real CP is illegal because the act of creating it is a crime, and by making it illegal you reduce demand, make it harder to sell, and hopefully save some kids.

The justifications for criminalising drawings are all dangerously close to "thought crime"

The argument for drawn CP being illegal basically boils down to "We think that seeing drawings of this and sating or fueling one's desires with it will likely make them commit actual criminal acts involving real children."

the other argument is that that content existing creates a demand for actual CP, which is kind of like trying to say that pirated games creates a demand for people stealing actual hard copies from stores.