Imagine being a swedish sex therapist when this ruling comes out and be sweating bullets realizing that the hospital you work for can now declare at any time that "sexual surrogate" is one of your duties.
Either take it up the coot, give up your career helping people with sexual problems, or pick up and leave your home country.
Other urls found in this thread:
It's no different than a soldier who doesn't want to kill people. If you can't perform the tasks required by the job, you need to pick another career, sorry bub
Sweden fucking sucks
lol so every midwife in Sweden is also the local cutwife
convenient if you find yourself craving a "little homicide" :-)
Is that a mutha fucking Penny Dreadful reference right there?
"My religion says that I am not allowed to work a day in my life, but I want to be ceo in your company and if you don't give me the spot and pay for keeping my fat ass on the couch and not doing shit like my religion says I should I'm suing you"
What? Thats not at all what the ruling is about. The ruling was about midwifes
A person seeking the position of CEO of a hospital shouldn't be required to pull the plug on a ward full of coma children because their parents signed the papers.
That's not anywhere near the same thing you retarded fucking faggot
But this is exactly how it should be
If she wants a job she has to do the work involved
Like the orthodox Jews in Israel?
All they do is getting paid for calling liberate Jews Nazis
Now Australia and diversity in the workplace regarding Mudslimes, Same same but different.
If the law declares that a person with the requisite skill must perform an act that, although legal, they find detestable (killing babies), then for the law to be legitimate it must be applied equally (letting basement dwellers put their fingers in you so they can become unrepressed)
No.
>have mudslime quota
>need new employees
>only even talk with whites
>ask them if they would convert on paper for a better pay
>quota failed
Autism
So, losing your job because you refuse to stick a pair of medical sissors into someone and chop up another living person into little bits so you can flush out that smaller person's chunks more easily from the bigger one is A-Ok.
But losing your job because you refuse to reach into some neckbeards pants to help him overcome something his uncle did to him as a child is crossing the line?
It shouldn't matter if you're for or against abortion, being required to provide an abortion seems wrong. Like something that could give someone a PTSD should just be wrong from a worker safety perspective.
Is being a pornstar legal in sweden?
In sweden, could I post a job for a secretary in which I also clearly define that duties also include making a porn video with me everyday?
If so, win!
I think that if they can force a person who just wants to bring children into the world to also snuff them out (as long as they're still inside someone else), then not only could you hire that secretary, but also you can fire her when she can no longer make you cum buckets for the camera (assuming you put her on a documented "performance plan" first).
Is this girl too young to sign up on a dating site? swingeer.com
If it was you who couldn't cum buckets, it would be you on the "performance plan".
But if you could prove the suckutary wasn't demonstrating enough enthusiasm for the camera, then you might escape a wrongful firing suit.
>This
What about a doctor hired by the Army, thinks he's there to save lives, didn't realize that his contract's "provide medical instruction" clause included the requirement to give soldiers medical training on which arteries to cut when attacking the enemy to ensure they bled-out within seconds because the army was needing to minimize it's POW intake?
Does it hurt being this retarded?
lol some grunt asks "do i stickem here?" and worlds saddest doctor has to correct the grunt and point to anatomy chart and say "no, here" if he wants to keep being a doctor
Not as bad as when the tarter-white, overweight, pasty, therapy patient accidentally goes "wrong-hole" on his new surrogate, but yeah, the tardation is a little uncomfortable.
If I am in Sweden, and my pregnant girlfriend demands that I punch her in the belly until the baby dies, but I refuse, have I comitted a civil rights violation against her?
If you refuse to hit her, and the baby was yours, then the charge would be rape.
If it was another man's baby, then the charge would be "failing to render aid"
Why would you refuse to help someone you call your "girlfriend"?
user, your advice is ignoring recent case law.
If the girlfriend was raped by one or more refugees and becomes pregnant, the boyfriend must report any requests by the GF to bring harm to the baby to the police so that she can be taken into sedative medical care until the baby is born or face charges of genocide.
You have a very active imagination, I hear that's common among people on the spectrum.
I forgive you. You couldn't have had any idea when you signed up to be the director of social media for Mr. Soros' new company that you would be forced to advocate for the forcing of medical professionals to vaccume out living humans from poor decision makers.
>fetus
>living
>2017
Good point, how can a fetus even be alive if it can't "question everything" yet? Barf.