Does knowing that America is currently supplying NATO with these keep Putin up at night?

Does knowing that America is currently supplying NATO with these keep Putin up at night?
>pic related

no, fucking trump in the ass keeps putin up at night

hahahaha

just google fyra..

a train?

Russia is far behind NATO when it comes to military power, as well as economical power. Whether or not the west as new aircraft, Russia doesn't compete. But I don't think Putin cares that much, he's probably too busy stealing money from the Russian people.

No. NATO is weak as fuck if it weren't for the U.S. All of Europe needs them, it allows European countries to not invest much in defence and invest their money elsewhere because they know someone will always have their back regardless. Americans are such cucks for the Europeans.

No because the program has been plagued with problems.

>a nato country supplies nato with weapons

HOLY FUCKING SHIT B0SS

sounds like a joke but the french actually have a decent military

the French were defeated by a bunch of jungle monkeys

>the program has been plagued with problems
And you expect people to build a brand new aircraft with everything that's implied without it being plagued with problems ?

...

The US air strike in Syria was staged by the trump administration and russia to create an illusion of conflict between the two parties

The United States lost to a bunch of gooks in a jungle then said it wasn't a war after all.

...

it wasnt a war. it was more of a peacekeeping mission for the US. if we wanted start an actual war in Vietnam we could have wiped the entire country of the map in a week.

the french on the other hand were actually fighting an all out war and losing

...

>peacekeeping mission
agent orange and napalm just to keep the commies quiet?
why not nuke them then?

kek

>lost
Depends if you go by kills to deaths US kicked ass especially in the major engagements.
If south Vietnam wasn't the corrupt shithole that it was then we'd probably have a north and south Vietnam now.

Now I know what it's like to be autistic.

The US won every battle but they lost the war.

>peacekeeping mission
Kek you just proved his point, people don't get drafted for a peacekeeping mission.

That doesn't count the amphibious assault ships that a virtually air craft carriers for F-35s. They have another 11...

Only because south Vietnam couldn't keep its shit together. Massive loss of support in the populace led to lots of rebel recruitment. Government was insane levels of corrupt. But since the US never made a major push past the peninsula to take ground it led to the loss. Just like they never bombed the major NV cities due to the fact that it could start a war with Russia.

>french
>decent military
too bad that they unable to fight with muslims equipped with ak47s

>Syria
>u.s military send missiles to syria...
> trump said "they have done a great job in irak..."

I love this guy... honestly

war should be sustainable

neither were two towers and a few night clubs hun?

>Us
>peace keeping

sorry what ?

Given that they don't fucking work, I imagine not.

>dosen't work
aircraft, russia
both?

Considering the f35 has been a massive failure so far? Probably fucking not.

That would be the idea, yes.

Airbus can do it.

...

such a beautiful piece of man made machinery

>airbus can do it
They can't because you're expecting something to happen that has never happened in the history of aeronautics.

F35 a shit desu senpai, we should be throwing more money at the Eurofighters rather then waste money on yank shit

Yeah the f35 is shit.
Stick with f18/16/22

Europeans are gay

>comparing surprise attacks on civilian targets to military engagements

we already declared war on terrorism

you keep praying for your capitals

>Lockheed can hold a candle to Sukhoi

It was a war, and you lost it