It's STILL better than every marvel movie ever made

It's STILL better than every marvel movie ever made.

>le edgy Alan Moore satanic symbolism movie directed by Zack Snyder

No thank you

>image.jpg

>yfw this happend

I agree on this one

The soundtrack is mindblowingly shit tho

because the source material was good

why can't marvel/dc come up with a single interesting story

Good band

>dat Silhouette

>tfw you realize Captain America Civil War is a Watchmen ripoff

>Implying watchmen was not GOAT

Daily reminder that the comedian did nothing wrong and Dr Manhattan is a cunt.

wew

> kills a pregnant woman
> rapes silk spectre
> murders protesters

Still manhattan was a cunt, literally a 15 year old philosophy student

Ozy did nothing wronk

nothing wrong

Silk spectre wanted to be raped, and he gave her a daughter, she even had drunken flashbacks with a smile on her face about the incident.

>Kills pregnant woman

First of all she attacked him with a bottle, secondly that was mainly Manhattans fault because he could have stopped the incident, since he should have known it would have happend with no "tachyons" to block the future.

Once again proving Dr Manhattan was the real bad guy.

>Murders protesters

He sees the world for what it is, a joke. And didn't he just shoot them in the face with teargas? Been a while since I watched it.

the first silk spectre was just asking for it

i need some context

>Watchmen better than Blade

Some motherfuckers always be ice skating up hill

LMAO nigga said blade

>It's Manhattan's fault because he didn't stop the Comedian from shooting her

Manhattan didn't make the Comedian pull a gun and shoot her. It's much more the Comedian's fault than Manhattan's. Displacing blame because someone could have stopped you but didn't is fucking retarded.

Needs a remake.

I'd rape her instead

He could have turned the glass into cotton or the bullet into a flower, but instead watched and let a pregnant woman die by a drunken PSTD HUMAN veteran.

Dr Manhattan is not human.

Remember that Dr Manhattan can see the future.

Maybe they can get an actor that doesn't play Ozymandias like an obvious villain.

And? He isn't responsible for the Comedian being a shitty person and shooting someone else. The blame for an event lies on whoever instigated the event.

Displacing blame because someone could have stopped you, but didn't, is cowardly and retarded.

long snoozefests, with spotty shining character moments, about government policy and uniting humanity are not better than rated r vampire slaying action flicks, you pseudo intellectual fuck

If Manhattan is able but not willing to stop evil, then he is manevolent.

So if I can predict the future I should not try to prevent evil from happening? Especially if I am omnipotent?

Blade 1 and 2 unironically shit on anything Marvel and DC have ever made post 2000

its not even the same league Blade is JV and Watchmen is NFL

kys millennial cuck

I'd change Ozymandias actor tho, looks weak and not like an ubermensch

It's ont he same level as Mystery Men and Blade/2.

There's no point in bothering with any other marvel/dc abominations.

Malevolence and apathy are two different things. You aren't malevolent because you don't care. Not being benevolent doesn't make you malevolent. That is a fundamentally wrong way to look at the world.

>We're all puppets, Laurie. I'm just a puppet who can see the strings.

It´s a piece of SHIT, like every Zack Snyder movie ever made.

No he cannot.

He is not omniscient or omnipotent.

He exists in the past, present and future of where is though. That is all, he is not bound by time, but he cannot see the future.

/thread

just call him a pseud next time, brah.

There is a difference between not being able to do something and not caring about it in order to internally deal with it, and being able to do something and not doing it because you're super autistic, like Manhattan

same fag mud nobody replied to his post.

Manhattan states many times that he's not omnipotent. And that he can't change the future, he just perceives all time simultaneously.

I think a comparison he made was a comic book. All of the events are already there, he can just flip forward and backward through the pages to see them at will.

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

You are right, if I know someone is going to shot a pregnant woman right next to me before it happends and I have the powers of a God, I am not in the wrong for not stopping him.

Also, only one person was in the wrong for the holocaust, apathy from the rest was not malevolence twoards the jews.

So did he or did he not know that the comedian was going to shot the pregnant woman?

Also, Epicurus disagrees with you.

If you want to make the distinction, go ahead. Apathy doesn't denote malevolence or benevolence. The blame still lies with Blake for shooting that woman.

It doesn't lie with his mother raising him differently.
It doesn't lie with his doctors for keeping him healthy throughout his life so that he'd live to shoot that woman.
It doesn't lie with all the people who have tried to kill Blake throughout the years so that he'd be unable to shoot that woman.

It lies with Blake.

having the powers of god puts you past the trivialities of life and death, all life ends, helping one last longer over another is pointless

if you're going to reference WWII mention the other millions that died in the camps, or the 75-100 million other people that died as a result of the war, don't just mention the jews, it makes you look preferentially brain washed

Was Rorscharck virgin?

Have DCucks finally admitted defeat?

Have they finally realized that Suicide Squad is indefensible so they have to resort to dredging up long past capeshit to spur more company wars?

BACK to Sup Forums

hmm...nah, he probably fucked hookers

>having the powers of god puts you past the trivialities of life and death, all life ends, helping one last longer over another is pointless

This is a valid answear, not "I'm just watching so not my fault lol", and I only used the ww2 reference of something that may or may not even happen to prove how your point of apathy vs malevolence dont work in reality.

Unlikely since his mother was a whore.

no dude
he was autistic and very right wing
he wouldve believed that it was beneath him and consider it something a degenerate would resort to
good question, ive never actually thought about this

Are you more in the wrong than the man who was going to shoot the pregnant woman?

And hilarious false equivalence with the Holocaust comparison. Being complicit with malevolent orders is not the same as non-involvement apathy.

But I also don't flatten complicated matters like that, where a person's disagreement could have meant consequences for more than just themselves, into black and white good or evil.

And?

OEDIPUS COMPLEX FOOL

you know what he probably was. that or he was gay

The movie lacks on how blatantly Moore is making fun of comic book readers and heroes.

I bet you're the kind of faggot that doesn't pull the lever

yawn

I think he was a heavily repressed homosexual.

Would explain much of this character

>Are you more in the wrong than the man who was going to shoot the pregnant woman?

You keep forgetting that he knew it was going to happend and he had the power to stop it, but he didn't.

>And?

Do you claim to know more about philosophy than one of the greatest philosopher ever lived?

he was anti-social and a bit of a nihilist but that doesn't necessarily mean he was autistic or have aspergers, I'm sure he fucked some escorts

I'd pull the lever, but I'm not going to say it's another test subject's fault for the people dying on the tracks when they were tied there by someone else.

>"I was not; I was; I am not; I do not care"

he wouldve never fucked a hooker, have you ever read the book?
nigger you are retarded

>You keep forgetting that he knew it was going to happend and he had the power to stop it, but he didn't.

He knew it was going to happen, he wouldn't care, and he wouldn't stop it. But you're dodging the question. In that situation, are you more in the wrong than the man who was going to shoot the pregnant woman?

>Do you claim to know more about philosophy than one of the greatest philosopher ever lived?

Philosophy isn't a hard science, so it doesn't really matter what his opinions were. Not to mention that many other philosophers have disagreed with him or built up on his philosophy because of its shortcomings.

But why does it matter for our conversation?

Didn't Rosarch have a little speech about how he hated degenerates like hookers or drug dealers? It has been a while since I watched the film

no man can go 40 years without shoving his dick into a living human body, and he would never form a real relationship with anyone on a romantic level, the only logical choice would be to fuck a hooker

youre an idiot
good luck with life
please dont have kids

yeah he did, but I still doubt he was a virgin

he never got laid just deal with it. how do you deal with it?

>no man can go 40 years without shoving his dick into a living human body
Go to r9k
>and he would never form a real relationship with anyone on a romantic level, the only logical choice would be to fuck a hooker
It is not logical.His introduction speech shits all over hookers,and he became a hero due his mum.

how many real life virgin have you known to stay celibate past 40? even in a fantasy world that's hard to believe, unless you through in a religious element to it, which the Watchmen never did for the character

>But you're dodging the question. In that situation, are you more in the wrong than the man who was going to shoot the pregnant woman?

I never said Dr Manhattan was "more in the wrong", I said he was to blame because he knew it would happend, and could have stopped it, but did not, therefor he is malevolent and a cunt. Where did I say Dr Manhattan was "more in the wrong"? I only said he was a cunt.

>But why does it matter for our conversation?

I don't know if it was you but some user told me "That is a fundamentally wrong way to look at the world."

Which I disagreed with and have a famous philosopher also disagreeing with, and of course philosophy is not a hard science, I would argue it's even a science, but this is not /sci/, and we are discussing, not researching.

hes right wing as fuck
nigger you obviously only know about the character through the movie
please stop posting anytime

>how many real life virgin have you known to stay celibate past 40?
Rosarch was killed for his principles.I doubt that he would betray them for a little pleasure.

he wasn't a virgin, and seemed barely capable of holding onto friendships let alone something of a romantic nature, hookers, whether he despised them or not, would be the only way he'd ever have sex, unless there's some back story about him have a wife or something that I never read, hookers would be that guy's only option

MEN GET ARRESTED

DOGS GET PUT DOWN

not everyone goes around telling everyone they are 40+ and still a virgin. it happens more than you think

First Blade movie was actually really good

Not that guy but are you 40+ and a virgin? Or do you know such a person?

he probably just jacked off and never got laid. it would explain his mental state. he seemed sexually frustrated

>he wasn't a virgin
We don't know it.There are 40 years old virgins out there.Stop making shit up
>But most people arent virgin at 40
It is fiction,and Rosarch is borderline autistic

>ywn fuck the elderly superior version of silk spectre while she's in her retirement home and you just drop by to give her her daily protein dose.

Why even FUCKING live.

no but i know people who are. it just never happens for them. time flies

yeah it is but not better than Watchmen

I don't see what the problem is, different people have different interests. If they really wanted to fuck they would have bought a hooker so why do people even care about other peoples life choiches?

Is everybody except Silk Spectre II autistic?

>Is everybody except Silk Spectre II autistic?
Only Manhattan and maybe rosarch are autistic.Nightowl is just the nice guy that turns out to be an asshole and oxymandians is focused on his agenda

people dont want to stoop to the level of buying sex. morals or whatever bit rorshach would never buy sex his sense of right and wrong was too great as shown when he was killed by dr. manhattan

Wasn't talking about Rorshach , more people in general.

But I think Rorshach was asexual, only driven by his boderline madness created by his crime fighting lifestyle and highly autistic about "right" and "wrong".

he was a boxer and a gymnast as a kid, you're telling me he never explored sexuality? with all that testosterone running through him? bullshit

before he went all vigilante he wasn't totally disconnected from people, he held a steady job and had interest other than man's decadence

Snyder fucked up so hard casting Veidt

Can your arguments get any more autistic?
The point of Rosarch is that he sees the world in black and white or good or bad,and he tries to end all that is bad.He gave his life because Oxymandias did something wrong,and Manhattan wanted to hide it.

I think that was Ozymandias, who is implied to be a pedo, nothing is mentioned about Rorschach past except that he was traumatized by his whore mom

not really he fits the intelligent billionaire playboy perfectly

are they insinuating that nightowl killed hooded justice. Because thats bullshit on every god damn level.

Really? What made him to become a Watchman then? We know how he became rorshach, but why did he become a watchman?

>I think that was Ozymandias, who is implied to be a pedo
what? did i miss something? elaborate

The real life murder of Kitty Genovese, who is known for codifying bystander syndrome