?
Are the smiths better than the beatles?
Other urls found in this thread:
Yea
Oh cool
No prob, Bob.
No.
Aw but the other guy said they are
He lied
I should have known. You really can't trust anyone on this horrible website.
Actually HE'S lying. The Smiths are better.
Maybe, can anyone name any other members other than Morrissey? Every album sounds like a Smiths album. Blazing new trails of staring down at our feet. Cuck music
No, not even close
>People don't know who Johnny Marr is
>People don't know who Andy Rourke is
Go back to r/hiphopheads you faggot
No, they are just different. Both have there pluses and minuses.
No, they lack diversity compared to the fab.
>Morrissey is a better singer than Lennon and McCartney
>Marr is a better guitarist than Harrison
>Rourke is a better bassist than McCartney
>Joyce is a better drummer than Ringo
>Morrissey and Marr are better songwriters than Lennon and McCartney
Seriously? That's the most concrete inarguable statement of the post.
its really a matter of preference. one is newer and more hip though
for
maybe technically, but you cant really compare them one on one desu.
Musically? Yes.
Backing you up in a fist-fight? Nah.
lol no
The actual answer is no. This means the Sup Forums-approved answer is yes.
k thanks
>Morrissey and Marr are better songwriters than Lennon and McCartney
Just no. The Smith is one of the greatest bands ever though.
Nope
No problem buddy
Patrician here.
Correct answer is yes they are.
yes obviously
>Yet they still manage to not make better music than the beatles
Yes.
Listening to The Smiths only for Morrissey is just slightly less dumb than listening to them only for Marr.
So much fucking Reddit in here
...
Yes, with no doubts
Of course
Probably, the Beatles kinda suck peenor
I actually feel like Andy Rourke is like one of those really calm dudes, but when shit goes down he already has his shirt off and is ready to go
I listen to the Smiths because Joyce and Rourke together are the best rthythm section of the 1980s.