This is for politics that don't belong in >>>Sup Forums

This is for politics that don't belong in Let's keep it civil. Enjoy.

Spectrum Tests
8values.github.io
filteries.com/politics

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=x-CrNlilZho
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

Found many of the questions stupid and a couple not even questions.

You're both cucked faggots that will be gassed when the Trumpenreich reaches its final form

I bet you would get along well with the Clintons

You sound mighty triggered

I would in my privatized prison.

Zoinks

...

Lotta fags in itt

...

...

>in in this thread
Learn a book

youtube.com/watch?v=x-CrNlilZho
Reminder to drop the mainstream media if you already haven't.

learn to grammer

Oh sorry i made a typo! STFU YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE! I'M A NAVY SEAL AND I WILL FUCK YOUR MOTHER

>wants to cut spending on working class people
>wants to give corporations big tax cuts

Ah, yes... the working class hero...

triggered, cuck?

I feel like it's cheaty to put "tradition" against both science progression AND social progression. Because science is important, but modern "social progression" is really just autistic screeching for rights for groups that'd be treated just fine if they'd chill the fuck out.

What is a social science?

Science progression includes things like human cloning, stem cells and transhumanism. Things that a lot of traditionalists are against, or think should be at least confined to the military.

A large scale con.

Not something I'd consider to be classified with legit sciences like biology, chemistry, physics, etc. Heck geology is more of a science than that

See I think that's fair to be put against tradition, but I don't think it's fair to put "Are you okay with faggots doing whatever they want?" with "Is technological improvement important to society?"

aye comrade

I'm an agnostic, SJW-hating, gay marriage-supporting, anti-drug centralist and there's nothing you can do about it.

what does this mean?

...

watchu gonna do

yo, comrade

no one cares? you're literally nobody

it just spits an ideology based on your responses. maybe look more into social liberalism and see if it fits you. if not, oh well.

recommend you read volume 1 of capital or maybe conquest of bread. conquest of bread is a little more anarchist though.

...

I know what social liberalism is, I'm more in for the Social-democrats

left libertairan master race reporting in

>When you just guzzle that capitalist kool-aid...

I like it.

>when you guzzle the commie cum

>Using fascist terminology to describe your leftism
I think we can do better than that comrade.

Das Kapital was alright

>when ur this triggered because someone likes democracy

...

>when you're this triggered
>because someone likes socialism

...

kill urself pls

Commies deserve the bullet.

>when u cant come up with ur own jokes

Bitte

Why do you hate democracy and freedom?

Communism isn't democracy and it isn't freedom. It's quite the opposite.

Traditionalists are implicitly against both.

Communism is to freedom as the Italian army is to effective

Communism/Marxism is democratic control over the production and the enterprise. Read more.

I got a free helicopter ride for you. Fucking commie

What if the demos wants to engage in capitalism?

Oh, looks like you got lost on your way to

it's state control over the means of production, and no, "the state = the people" is not a valid counter-argument

>Voting to have someone take away your freedom and voice in how you make and distribute the profits you produce.

Unlikely, but possible I guess

just kys

Communism is the absence of the state, money, and class. You don't have to take my word for it. Look it up yourself instead of sipping the capitalist kool-aid

What you're talking about is anarchy, communism requries a state to redistribute the wealth.

maybe one day you'll wake the fuck up

State control over the means of production is State Capitalism. The USSR is a good example of this.

that's cherry picking. you're either progressive, or you're not. these things happen because they are connected. you can't stop individual freedom just because you hate gays.
just like i can't stop you from masturbating to traps.

it means you have no clue about anything and answer based on your feelings.

you're fine. just don't prevent people further to the left to do their thing because you feel like your standpoint has the moral highground.

fuck off.

>Let's keep it civil.
>maybe one day you'll wake the fuck up

kek

pic got removed for no reason.

it's a quote from the departed. pretty good movie. i recommend it.

anarchic communism is the only communism.
at least until we have an automated distribution system.

>Never knew how to call my Political orientation
>Neither a libtards nor a Righty
This outcome genuinely surprised me

TBH, the EU & UN questions had me doubt the most.

Anonymous boards need more vocal leftists...

you can be socially liberal without being an SJW-loving, islamophile cuck.
it just means people should have individual freedom without the state interfering too much. granted, some people are too dumb to be left ungoverned, but that's another topic.

>automated distribution system.
lmao

Is this site some kind of Libertarian propaganda thing? They call 80% of the shit Libertarian something

Liberals are the worst... Less predictable than right-wingers but that makes them a little more dangerous.

He said politics that don't belong in Sup Forums

I contributed

Libertarian describes the state control aspect of politics. You can (kind of) be left or right wing libertarian.

i agree. but then some dudebro comes along with all the machismo in the world, thinking that if he worked hard for his alleged wealth, everyone else should have to crawl through shit as well.
kinda makes it hard to argue, when you can't even get through a person's ego.

yea, super funny. totally never gonna happen. automation is a myth and hasn't caused a complete shift in employment sectors.
so it's fucking NUTS to think it might have an influence on governments in the future. fuck me, right?

Liberalism in the west has literally nothing in common with it's roots. Same with feminism. What once was a fight for the personal freedoms of everybody turned into the fight for superiority of a set of dogmas and ideas

Well, you're certainly better than this fucker

...

The first word describes the political, the second the economic view

I get it, but how is this libertarian, unless they just use it as a synonym for anarchist.

Anyone who values civil liberties is either a libertarian, anarchist or centrist. Most people are generally put off by the authoritarian policies of the mainstream political parties, so the high frequency of this type of result is not entirely unlikely.

...

Balance of power is key for any system to work. Communism does not have that, it's actually extremely naive.

It is kind of a synonym for anarchist. Anti-state, pro-liberty type stuff

...

...

Evidence, please?

Commies get out. REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

ok

triggered, cuck?
welcome, comrade

You type like someone who is in their early 20s or late teenage years, therefore you're too young to know anything about the real world, therefore you're naive.

>Views the don't fit Sup Forums thread
>Not Sup Forums views thread

I found this pretty cool

Exactly what I thought.

alright, i'll bite. why is idealism the same as naivety for you?
because i don't base my future utopian system on the feeling that "everyone should be equal and free to decide how to live their lives, because i don't want to work XD"

it's a bit more complicated than that. capitalism is dying, everyone who denies that is delusional. in a world where a little elite owns more than half the world, you can't be defending it by saying "they worked hard for it. if you work just as hard, you can achieve the same".
this elitist system has been self-sufficient for generations, slowly expanding. we have a disenfranchised underclass, and a non represented middle class that actually thinks by kicking down on the underclass, they will be able to become rich.
we have corporations that control governmental decisions and people who vote for corporate liars in hope for change. they don't even realize that their vote will change nothing, because it's voting inside the rules of a system that is built to protect itself, and by that, the elites benefiting from it.

so tell me now, why do you think my view is naive? and what's your alternative?

I'll do what I damn well please, pinkos.

fucking lefties and righties... you're both fucking retarded

Nice ad hominem. Try using some actual logic next post.