"I never liked The Beatles, I never really liked any British group, I don't think the British should play rock and roll...

>"I never liked The Beatles, I never really liked any British group, I don't think the British should play rock and roll... I never took British rock and roll seriously and I still don't."

Based.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/t-f2rz2G9AI?t=77
youtube.com/watch?v=Jcd9BS2Ty_Mq
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

the beatles and lou red sucked

Your mom sucks too

Yeah but now Lou Reed is dead, what a putz

>prince dies
zomg
>bowie dies
zomg
>reed dies
who?

he was the rockest
and until this is acknowledged there will be no peace for mankind

What a douchey comment. I suspect even he didn't believe this.

>who?

What the fuck are you on about? My Facebook was awash with saturnine hipsters mourning his death and the media didn't ignore it either (certainly in the UK anyway).

>only talented member of his band was a Welsh guy
Hmmmm

he probably was just messin' around on the interviews. Probably he didn't believe that at all.
Also, Beatles > V/U

British rock is inferior to American rock in every way.

>Beatles > V/U

This is Sup Forums in 2017. Pure leddit.

Realistically it isn't and there is both excellent rock and dire schmaltz from both countries. Try harder m8.

>“I never liked the Beatles,” Reed said. “I thought they were garbage. If you say, ‘Who did you like?’ I liked nobody.”
he clearly didn't like them

>Beatles > V/U

Yea, no.
Reed alone was more important and innovative than whole Beatles.

Beatles was generic pop rock band. TVU was truly straight forward thinking band.

UK prog > US prog
UK post-punk > US post-punk
UK post-rock > US post-rock

They were both equally innovative tho'. What Sgt Peppers and Revolver did to popular music stand in the same level of what V/U did for the rock and puck scene.
>Beatles was generic pop rock band. TVU was truly straight forward thinking band.
From here and on, it's just your opinion.

>Lou Reed
dead
>the United Kingdom
alive (barely)

from my point of view it is Lou Reed that is the loser

t. Musically illiterate Scaruffidrone

Everything "innovative" you there's in Revolver, Zappa did first with Freak Out.

Beatles is good, I like them, but they wasn't innovative.

>hated the Beatles
>performed with Yoko
What did he mean by this?

Be careful you'll summon boldfaure

>if you agree with someone you are a drone

You are a RollingStonedrone then

are you sure that UK isn't a zombie though
from my point of view undead is worse than dead so Lou Reed is the winner again

And you sucked my ding dong

>tfw lou died on a sunday morning

that is socialism for you

Hey man you shouldn't do that

But there are no good American rock bands sooooo...?

/thread

british psychedelia is also better

How the fuck could someone be this wrong?

this

nice augment

>Sup Forums in 2017
nah

I popped champagne after that hack died to celebrate.

>lou reed
>rock n roll

>tfw he's still pointing at us

name 5 (while the Beatles were still together)

The Beach Boys
The Doors
The Mothers of Invention
The United States of America
The Grateful Dead

one isn't even a band, it's a country
like wtf duude?

who couldve tuned all of his strings to the same note otherwise? the man was clearly from another planet

...

>One chord is fine. Two chords are pushing it. Three chords and you're into jazz.

youre stretching it a bit

>UK prog > US prog
True

The other two are fag genres only homos care about so I guess it would only be natural the british excel at them.

at least say The Band, even though they were mostly Canadian.

All of those bands are great though

Bad taste

Homo spotted

He's right, you know

/our guy/

Being gay isn't right, it's against nature.

>taking anything lou reed said in an interview at face value

underage?

The Grateful Dead suck ass.

Just trying to earn a dollar

>The United States of America
My nigga
The genius of The Beatles isn't on innovation. They weren't innovative or experimental in the purest sense, because all they did, they did it with a commercial appeal in mind. What they wanted to do was to experiment with the pop genre and making damn good songs while at it. as they were amazing songwriters too. If it sounds generic it´s because everyone modeled themselves after The Beatles.
If you judge them solely on their experimentation, you are a moron.

I think you accidently your english Ranjit.
Still Beatles>VU

>I liked nobody
damn................................

US post-rock is at least on par

Heh.. say that to my face fucker

Bob Dylan said that I Wanna Hold Your Hand was groundbreaking stuff in 1964, it blew him away at the time.

Have you even acknowledged the amazing drums on TVU songs? You fucking retarded mate?

Lou Reed said the truth about Christgau anyway.

please come back lou, and bring bowie with you

Lou generally seemed to hate all of his contemporaries, if you take his interview comments at face value (which you shouldn't do).

But there are times when he's laudatory of other musicians. For instance in this audio clip he's praising The Ramones (who he had just heard for the first time):

youtu.be/t-f2rz2G9AI?t=77

Wasn´t it their first US tv appearence too? That should have been gigantic at the time.
What i find the most admirable about them is how all of their music can be enjoyed in a very superficial way, but also if you examine more closely their songs, you'll see too how much of a genius they were, though it also gives the chance to edglords to brand as merely generic pop.They had that balance of being extremely popular and having amazingly good music.
They arenpt the biggest artist on the oworld for nothing

>They aren't the biggest artist in the world for nothing

to be fair there are comparably popular artists who really did not have complex or "genius" music (Elvis, The Eagles, Garth Brooks, Madonna). popularity is not really a useful indicator for artistic merit

...

But what about John Cale?
Lou you fucked up there son

No it isn't

You might've gotten dubs but these opinions are spouted but a dead jew fag who went through electro-shock therapy so he'd stop being a cock sucker and went on to fuck a German nazi ice queen and be managed by a hack who thought painting reproductions of tomato soup labels were "Art". And then puts out a two record set of nothing but feed back and calls it "Rock and Roll"! Who the fuck pays attention to this dead talentless hack anyway?

Fuck The Velvet Underground!
This is who they wanted to be!

The Velvet Underground were posers while The Fugs were the real deal! (And picture posted came out THREE YEARS BEFORE the "Banana Peel" album!)

Do you like boobs a lot?

While we're at it
British electronic >>>>>>>>>> American electronic "music"

youtube.com/watch?v=Jcd9BS2Ty_Mq

lou reed has always been based

Yes I like boobs a lot!

But the Fugs' music just wasn't very good

Then The Velvet Underground must have done a good job trying to be like them.

(You) earned it

The Jimi Hendrix Experience
The Velvet Underground

Americans invented Techno, House, Breaks, Disco... the list could go on

>"I never liked The Velvet Underground, I never really liked any Jewish group, I don't think the Jewish should play rock and roll... I never took Jewish rock and roll seriously and I still don't."

He seemed to rip off the Rolling Stones enough on VU&N tho

There was news reports on fucking GMA when he died.

Those genres were all perfected by British artists, who then took them in interesting new directions.

where those two the biggest loss in the last decades?

I feel the same when a British tries to rap

I'd say Prince is on the same level, but those were definitely the biggest.

>le funny gay voice