Prove me wrong

Prove me wrong
Protip: You can't

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/environment/2010/mar/15/green-consumers-more-likely-steal
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

stalin and lenin were lawful good? that doesnt seem right.

And the founding fathers of the US where chaotic evil.

great retard magnet.

But communism doesn't work...

LEFTISTS ARE A CANCER UPON THE WORLD.

HURR REAL COMMUNISM AIN'T B TRIED YET DURR

>yfw Righties stand for the same values as extremist muslims and islamists while said islamists disregard any liberal and libertarian values and neither of both realize it

LIBERTARIANISM IS GOD TIER

If you swapped the evil and good columns, it might be only 85% retarded. Evidence:

• The weird old preppers/gun-collectors down in purple actually tend to be pretty well-behaved folks (look at the statistics on violent crime committed by CCL holders).
• The narcissistic faggots down in green have been proven to hold themselves to lower standards of conduct than most people, because it is beliefs and words rather than actions that makes you moral in that paradigm set (e.g.: theguardian.com/environment/2010/mar/15/green-consumers-more-likely-steal ; or just become friends with a group of them and watch them always try to back out of doing really easy normal-friend shit shit to help each other out, lie to each other, rip each other off on minor drug deals, and constantly steal lighters, cigarettes, bus fare, etc. from each other).
• Lawful Evil just fits way better with the petty opportunism and title-seeking of Communist party officials and informants than it does with Authoritarian Right. These traits are not of necessity (or perhaps even often) absent from Authoritarian Right, but they are basically essential to the very character and operating methodology of Authoritarian Left.

(Yes, I know it's just bait, fuck off.)

...

Your diagram assumes that "left"=="good" and "right"=="evil". Of course, you've offered no evidence to support that assertion, or even defined what you mean by the terms.

So you're right - we can't prove useless, meaningless word salad wrong, but we can say that it's vague, nonspecific, borderline idiocy and thus dismiss it out of hand.

"Blue taco nacho crisp autumn freeways!"

Prove me wrong bros. pro-tip: you can't.

>You can't
Of course not, purely subjective statements cannot be proven right or wrong.

That doesn't make any fucking sense. What the fuck makes communism "lawful good" and national socialism "lawful evil"? They're both lawful evil.
Same with fucking liberalism and libertarianism. They're both "chaotic neutral".

>being 16 years old

>north korea
>communist state
>international sanctions
>impossible to trade
>still nuclear power


But communism has never been tried

No one's saying communism has never been tried.
Also, North Korea has their own version of communism that no one outside of North Korea is claiming to be a good thing.

>lolberg
>wanting ackmed to rape your butthole

>being this 12

It would be more accurate if you turned the alignment chart 45 degrees counter clockwise

I guess i'm in the middle leaning right.
But i hate libertarians AND communists

Rightards don't care they agree with radical Islam 99% of the time, they want to be the ONLY fascists, which is why they don't like them.

you got the sides the wrong way round

Hitler's Nazi Party 'lawful evil'? Pretty sure they broke plenty of laws...

low quality bait

try harder