Sunday straight shota

sunday straight shota

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_drawn_pornography_depicting_minors
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

...

...

...

...

bump for moar

bump for moaar!

Bump

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

any saus for this? reverse search gives nothing

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Aogami is great

...

...

...

...

...

yo

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_drawn_pornography_depicting_minors
In response to Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, Congress passed the PROTECT Act of 2003 (also dubbed the Amber Alert Law) and it was signed into law on April 30, 2003, by then president George W. Bush.[61] The law enacted 18 U.S.C. § 1466A, which criminalizes material that has "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting", that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is "obscene" or "depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in...sexual intercourse...and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value". By its own terms, the law does not make all simulated child pornography illegal, only that found to be obscene or lacking in serious value. And mere possession of said images is not a violation of the law unless it can be proven that they were transmitted through a common carrier, such as the mail or the internet, or transported across state lines.[62] There is also an affirmative defense made for possession of no more than two images with "reasonable steps to destroy" the images or reporting and turning over the images to law enforcement.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_drawn_pornography_depicting_minors

2005 Virginia case[edit]
In Richmond, Virginia, in December 2005, Dwight Whorley was convicted under 18 U.S.C. 1466A for using a Virginia Employment Commission computer to receive "obscene Japanese anime cartoons that graphically depicted prepubescent female children being forced to engage in genital-genital and oral-genital intercourse with adult males."[69][70][71] On December 18, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, consisting of 20 years imprisonment.[72] The court stated:
Thus, regardless of whether §1466A(a)(1) requires an actual minor, it is nonetheless a valid restriction on obscene speech under Miller, not a restriction on non-obscene pornography of the type permitted by Ferber. We thus find Whorley's as-applied constitutional challenge to §1466A(a)(1) to be without merit.[73]
Attorneys for Mr. Whorley have said that they would appeal to the Supreme Court.[74][75] The request for rehearing was denied on June 15, 2009, and the petition for his case to be reviewed by the Supreme Court was denied on January 11, 2010.[76]
2008 Iowa case[edit]
In October 2008, a 38-year-old Iowa comic collector named Christopher Handley was prosecuted for possession of explicit lolicon manga. The judge ruled that two parts of the PROTECT Act criminalizing "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting" were unconstitutional, but Handley still faced an obscenity charge.[66] Handley was convicted in May 2009 as the result of entering a guilty plea bargain at the recommendation of his lawyer, under the belief that the jury chosen to judge him would not acquit him of the obscenity charges if they were shown the images of question

2010 Idaho case[edit]
In October 2010, 33-year-old Idaho man Steven Kutzner entered into a plea agreement concerning images of child characters from the American animated television show The Simpsons engaged in sexual acts.[78][79] The case was originally brought up due to the fact that the German Federal Police identified and reported to U.S. authorities Kutzner's IP address as one where a known file containing actual child pornography was being shared.[80] During the forensic investigation, which uncovered "six hundred and thirty two (632) image files, seventy (70) of which were animated images graphically depicting minors engaging in sex acts," "five-hundred-and-twenty-four (524) pornographic image files, most of which depict what appears to be teenaged females," and "more than eight-thousand files containing images child erotica involving younger children, many of them prepubescent,"[80] Kutzner admitted that he had knowingly received actual child pornography "for at least eight years."

2011 Maine case[edit]
In November 2011, Joseph Audette, a 30-year-old computer network administrator from Surry, Maine, was arrested after his username was linked to child pornography sites. A search inside Audette's home did result in photographic child pornography in addition to "anime child pornography".[81] Much unlike previous cases (and likely due to the results of the Handley ruling), the charges for the cartoons specifically were quickly dismissed under Maine law and dropped under federal law.[82]
2012 Missouri case[edit]
In October 2012, after being reported August 2011 by his wife, a 36-year-old man named Christian Bee in Monett, Missouri entered a plea bargain to "possession of cartoons depicting child pornography", with the U.S. attorney's office for the Western District of Missouri recommending a 3-year prison sentence without parole. The office in conjunction with the Southwest Missouri Cyber Crimes Task Force argued that the "Incest Comics" on Bee's computer "clearly lack any literary, artistic, political or scientific value." Christian Bee was originally indicted for possession of actual child pornography, but that charge was dropped as part of a plea deal, and was instead charged with possession of the "Incest Comics.

1/?

Get reported pedos

2/?

I feel like the giant black dick really detracts from this image, rather than adding anything to it.

3/?

4/?

5/?

6/?

7/?

8/?

9/?

10/?

11/?

12/?

13/?

hot thanks! yes

14/?

15/?

16/?

17/?

18/?

19/20

20/20

fin

thanks mate

>being this retarded
"Currently, such depictions are in a legal grey area due to parts of the PROTECT Act being ruled unconstitutional on a federal level"

np fam, little slow today looks like most of us are in church

...

1

2

...

3

...

...

4

...

5

...

fin

6

Suck a dick, nigger.

Why does it have to be a young child though?

7

8

...

that's what shota is dummy
don't you fantasize being a little boy and someone older starts and come play with you hmmmm

...