What was Sup Forums's problem with this again?

What was Sup Forums's problem with this again?

The ending was weird to be sure but up until then it was a 10/10 space flick.

>Love is the only thing that can travel through black holes.

shit like this.

Autistic dialogue and characters plus heaps of exposition in typical nolan fashion. Also glib one-liners and forced emotion.

Love never trancended space and time numbnuts, only gravity did.

Pay attention to the fucking movie.

Nolan writes all his films to have some kind of cyclical twist that brings it all back to an element that is shown to us in the beginning and it always seems forced and gimmicky.

>the character said it so it's true

Spot the autism

>Spot the autism
Found it in Nolan's script

Love never trancended space and time.

You are plain wrong.

I've heard a lot of complaints about this, and I never got why. All it was saying is that love is not something that can be measured or explained the way science can. It transcends time and space.

But yeah the black hole thing was dumb, but then again, it's a movie

I know. I'm just saying Nolan can't write believable dialogue, characters or emotion.

Film is a visual medium.

God, this board when this came out hurt my brain.

>Scene where they go through the wormhole
>Totally fine, everyone accepts this entire scene because some meme scientists said it looked pretty accurate
>despite we actually have zero idea and/or data of what would actually happen when going through a wormhole
>Black hole scene
>OMG WHAT IS THIS BULLSHIT THAT'S NOT WHAT WOULD HAPPEN THAT'S NOT WHAT'S IN A BLACK HOLE THIS MOVIE IS RETARDED I WANT MY MONEY AND TIME BACK

And Nolan fails completely in that sense, because almost all of his films rely heavily on expository dialogue to convey his plot, and that dialogue is often glib and lacking in emotion.

Nolan is popular, so people here will use any sort of mental gymnastics to convince themselves that his movies are somehow terrible.

Yeah, he totally failed. That's why the film was a massive hit. Everyone ELSE is dumb user, you're the only smart one!

>the visuals fail because the dialog is bad

Are you completely braindead?

Because one is a theoretical portal reaching and connecting large distances while the other is known to be a gigantic gravity well that destroys everything.

>People go through wormhole, and exit in another place.
This is fine and fits scientific theory. His choice of visuals for the inside of the wormhole has no actual bearing on the plot, so there's not so much to complain about there.
>Cooper go into a black hole.
>The center is a fifth dimensional tesseract that represents time in a 3D space as a bookshelf and allows Cooper to travel to any point in his life.
>Also it was made by people from the future who have transcended spacetime
This is where he may have jumped the shark

No, Nolan fails as a film maker because he's unable to convey a coherent plot without heaps of dialogue and exposition. Like you said, film is a visual medium, and Nolan seems to have trouble understanding that.
>Popularity is directly proportional to the quality of a film
This has never been true and you know it.

pfffthahhahahaha

Am i the only one who cried like a bitch during this? I just finished like an our ago and im glad i didn't watch it with anyone

>the visuals are bad because the plot is bad

You are completely and hopelessly fucking retarded. Kill (You)rself

Who cares if the science isn't perfect, it's a movie, not a physics lecture. Why is Sup Forums so fucking autistic about the dumbest things

Name even 3 of his movies that do that

I almost teared up in the scene where Matthew Machaughanheyahey watches the videos from earf

>No, Nolan fails as a film maker because he's unable to convey a coherent plot without heaps of dialogue and exposition. Like you said, film is a visual medium, and Nolan seems to have trouble understanding that.

This is honestly the stupidest thing I've read on Sup Forums today lol

This gets posted literally every interstellar thread and somehow after like 2 years people still don't understand a plot point that was basically written across the screen in comic sans

>known to be a gigantic gravity well that destroys everything.
It's even said in the film, and is scientifically accurate, that we don't know what happens beyond what we can see. You don't know exactly what a black hole is or does. You're the same kind of idiot that thinks you know something because you know 1% of what there is to know about it.

---------------------------

This post is protected by Gold Level Response Insurance. If responded to, the response is hereby 1) Invalid and ignored 2) Proof of being blown the fuck out. Backed by the Multi-national Meme Association. PC#148801 TM 2016.

>Nice visuals (which fail to convey anything meaningful in terms of story or themes) excuse a terrible script that insults the intelligence of the viewer
Also
>>the visuals are bad because the plot is bad
Not what I said. You must have the comprehension skills of a ten year old. Read my posts again and you might figure it out this time.

Why's that?

you might actually want to get checked to see if you're retarded user.

no. you just got memed hard.

>We don't know what's in the center of a black hole, therefore it's ok for this movie to use it as a deus ex machina

>All it was saying is that love is not something that can be measured or explained the way science can
but it can be explained
I'm too dumb to remember how exactly, but it's basically about chemicals and stuff in your brain, like every emotion
that doesnt make it less amazing of course, it's just not that magic

bet this fagtard loves Snyder.

If it was focused mainly on the message travelling through 'time' etc rather than love it would be outstanding.
I really think it's criminally underrated.

>All these non-arguments
Stumped ya

He says the visuals are bad because the plot sucks. That makes no sense.

His point was caring about plot is for stupid people, which is kinda true.

That's not what he said. He said Nolan fails to utilize his visuals for anything other than looking pretty and relies on dialogue and exposition to convey all of his plot.

My only real problem is that for reasons unknown even to myself I hate Anne Hathaway and I can't stand to see her horseface in any movie. Besides that it was great.

>The inside of the black hole just happens to be the solution to all of their problems
wew laddy

>10/10 space flick
>50% of movie is about farmers and corn
Not necessarily one of the worst movies I've seen, but Im certainly glad it was free on amazon

Sup Forums doesn't like anything popular. 4channers don't even like other 4channers. they don;t like shit

Millennials think that love is lame. They'd prefer a movie about abortions and cuckoldry.

My problem with Nolan is that hes such a sloppy director. He really needs a good screenwriter to help polish the scripts, and an editor that isn't afraid to challenge him and cut out unecessary bullshit and ensure continuity between scenes.

>hurr love
>durr emotions
>at the end it's said that the future people did it

so what was the point of all those emotional dialogues?

I like some popular things. I just don't like some other popular things that are blatantly overrated. This movie is one of those things

What year were you born?

I get what you're saying and I've heard about that too. Although everything we know can be explained scientifically, there are things that are 'magical'.

I think the movie is trying to say, you can be on the other side of the universe in a completely different time, but that doesn't change how much you love someone.

>visuals for anything other than looking pretty

Film is a visual medium. So he's doing perfectly fine.

I dont have any problem with this movie. Its perfect just the way it is.

And it was one hell of an experience watching it on the imax. Watched it 3 times and it only got better and better. Cant remember when was the last time a movie and its soundtrack can give me such heavy, larger than life experience but still very personal and grounded.

I also dont get the one idiotic meme complain about 'hurr love can transcend time and space so its shit durr' because its simply not true. Its a simple movie yet so many plebtards who's trying hard to be patrician cant get the simplest thing and hiding behind totally plebs-go-to cliche like 'incoherent plot' even if they dont know what that means.

see

Sup Forums has no idea what parts of the science are factual, what parts are theoretical, and what parts are fictional. This board will bitch through the entire movie in the hopes that at some point they are right instead of taking a couple minutes to learn the science behind the movie

>caring about plot is for stupid people,
It really depends on the movie in question. Some movies are more metaphorical and meant to be taken figuratively while others are a vehicle FOR the plot.

Caring about plot is for simple minded plebs.

1989. Yes I'm a millennial, so I know them well. The entire criticism for this amazing film boils down to
>dude love can't transcend time and space, love isn't real, it's just a hallmark scam reeeeeeeeee
Meanwhile I see cuckold porn all over this board. Yeah, I know what their problem with the movie is.

>Film is a primarily visual medium
>Cinematography's only use in film is to look nice
You're retarded

No, I'm well aware that everything that took place inside the black hole is entirely fictional and is a textbook example of deus ex machina

>I think the movie is trying to say, you can be on the other side of the universe in a completely different time, but that doesn't change how much you love someone.
seriously? that's the 2deep4u message from nolan?

how is that suppose to answer my question about idiotic dialogues incoherent with what actually happens on the screen?

Nolan is somewhat autistic, so that's the best he could come up with

I cried like a little bitch when he watched those video logs because it reminded me of my dead dad.

Who said it was supposed to be deep? It's a simple message. You're the one looking for "depth" in a fucking movie. You're the asshole in this scenario.

>What was Sup Forums's problem with this again?

It was popular and well received, those were Sup Forums's problems with it

Your dad would be proud of those digits

see

I could name plenty of films that Sup Forums loves which were also popular and well received. Your argument is not an argument at all. Also, plenty of people in this thread have stated completely valid issues with the film.

>read all the time how stupid you are because you "didn't understand the message"
>point out a cliche done to dead million times over
yes, clearly i'm the asshole. not all the pleb who sucks the shit out of nolan's asshole and acts like the movie is anything else than mediocre.

Explains why Nolan makes such plot-heavy films

As a pleb filter for retards like the ones ITT.

>The ending was weird

Heaven forbid a science fiction movie with actual science fiction in it.

Honestly its partly a reaction to the fags that flooded the board when it was released calling it "the most scientifically accurate movie ever" or trying to play nolan off as some visionary director with hidden depths.

Same thing with shit like man of steel. I liked the movie for what it was, while acknowledging that its got some legitimate problems... But when you come on Sup Forums and suffer through another shitpost about how deep the movie is the last thing you want to do is, even accidentally, validate their retarded opinions.

Wow "pleb filter" really is the new phrase to excuse people from explaining why they like terrible films. Also your logic is retarded.
>Plot is for simple minded plebs
>Therefore Nolan's plot-heavy films are pleb filters

I think if anything, the movie is trying to get you interested in science. Like, if you watched the movie then looked up all the reasons it's science is wrong, then you learned something.

Also the most blatant point of the movie is climate change.

>What was Sup Forums's problem with this again?

I don't know about Sup Forums but here are some problems I had with the film...

>Act I's exposition is weak and is almost entirely delivered by Michael Caine as Michael Caine as Space Professor Alfred
>Michael Caine is of course the same character in every single Nolan movie, and quite a lot outside of the Nolanverse
>The characters are weak, including the two leads, whose only notable aspect of character between the both of them would be McConaughey's accent
>McConaughey and Chastain's characters relationship isn't fleshed out well enough. "Love" actually might not have been a big deal if Nolan knew how to actually direct emotion, instead of just writing it on a script and expecting it to translate
>Matt Damon's dramatic appearance isn't so much dramatic as unwarranted for lack of an act devoted to the character or at the very least a parallel to draw on. Supercameo Mann freakout makes sense within the plot and basic understanding of human nature, but watches like an absolute bore with no impact to the viewer
>Forced crewmate sacrifice that isn't even presented well. Character had approx. 3 lines, I.E. had no character. Nolan is bad at emotion and characters, more news at 11. I imagine he thinks the average person cries when they hear of a murder in their locale

I could keep going I suppose. There's also plenty of nitpicky shit, like controlling the drone with the touchpad, but fuck it.

In the end the film was credited for exactly the only thing it did right: Visuals, which were damn good.

The Docking Sequence was thoroughly underwhelming.

>I'm mad because people don't have the same opinion as me.

yeah, nolan's bullshit fiction about feelings is so much better

>Yes I'm a millennial
Quit reading right there.

I agree with all of this. The script feels like a first or second draft

How lazy.

I love this movie and will never not love it.

exactly. this is all what the interstellar's fans use to say. that's why they're such pleb.

Thats been my problem with the last couple nolan movies honestly.

>a millennial calling someone lazy
The irony.

Wut, are you agreeing with me or nah

DUDE LOVE TARS LMAO

considering what you did? You were lazier then him.

Any movie that tries really hard to pull heart strings is definitely rubbish. The visual is good, though

He liked:

>Grown Ups
>Jonah Hex
>G.I. Joe
>G.I. Joe 2
>Battle: Los Angeles
>The Green Hornet
>Clash of the Titans
>Indiana Jones 4
>Transformers 2
>Death Race
>Fantastic Four: Rise of Silver Surfer
>I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry
>Takers
>Taken
>Transporter 3
>Resident Evil: Afterlife
>Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

He disliked:
>The Tree of Life
>There Will Be Blood
>Black Swan
>The Social Network
>Tangled
>The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
>The Road
>The King's Speech
>Synecdoche, New York
>Transformers
>Toy Story 3
>Eastern Promises
>Stardust
>The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
>Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives
>Tales from the Golden Age
>Let Me In
>All Marvel movies
>The Dark Knight
>Mother
>The Hurt Locker
>Blue Valentine
>Up
>Hellboy 2

He also compared Hannah to Kick-Ass because they both have a young female character, thinks I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry is a modern classic, thinks Live Free or Die Hard is the best Die Hard, compared The Road to Resident Evil, thinks Clash of the Titans is better than the LOTR Trilogy, prefers Transformers 2 to Transformers, and thinks CJ7 is deeper and more profound than There Will Be Blood.

And he gets paid

all the money in the world won't stop him from being a homosexual nigger

yes, i agree that interstellar's fans are retards. you've greentexted the essence of their posts just perfectly.

Bueno

>having no taste

>being a pleb

>being a contrarian

contrarians are the real plebs.

Inception
Prestige
Memento

you must love the new ghostbusters, pleb.

That movie's reviews do not count because of the political storm surrounding it's release.