What happened?

What happened?

Other urls found in this thread:

science.house.gov/news/press-releases/former-noaa-scientist-confirms-colleagues-manipulated-climate-records
google.com/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/amp/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html
youtube.com/watch?v=Wllc5gSc-N8
m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/18/ed-feulner-democrats-would-punish-climate-change-d/
skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm
climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
youtu.be/SI5ulKiZAoE
google.com/amp/www.newsweek.com/should-climate-change-deniers-be-prosecuted-378652?amp=1
youtu.be/LqQJrcopMUk
twitter.com/AnonBabble

his mom failed when she tried to abort him, that's what happened

dammit bill nye's mom, you fucking had your chance

Money and mental illness

He isn't Doctor Emmett Lathrop Brown: Proud White.

I like to think that he was offered a huge sack of cash and he sold out.

Sigh.

Ok but what happened? I just got out of jail and missed out on some drama it seemed.

In the last few decades he found support among the left far more the the right for fact-based science. As a result of this polarization of the left and the right when it came to science, Bill let his bias get to him. He's a human just like everyone else. Sad to see him this way though.

Ok but what did he do?

When? Recently or...?

He's probably trying to stay "up with the times" to stay relevant and continue to spread his message. But he (or at least the people who write for the show) is over representing lgbt ideas.

you made the thread, tell me what happened. What are you upset about now?

I have no idea what exactly they're talking about, but Bill Nye's been speaking about transgender rights and the environment, so maybe that's it.

We've all underestimated the potency of thought cancer
The only way to treat cancer is to kill cancer
Not even the redpill Sup Forums's want to say it because it would mean killing a fuck ton of ppl and their morality wouldn't let them

People seem to be talking about him now more than two months ago.

he was caught on camera saying how gays and lesbians were "mistakes of evolution" and how society should cull them from the herd in order to further the species

he didn't know the camera was rolling at the time ofc

every youtube clip i've seen of it has been taken down, and new ones keep popping up and getting taken down

it's like he has a fucking army of take down artists or something, wtf man

Could you upload it to liveleak or something? That seems too retarded for him, quite hard to believe.

We grew up watching him, so now they think they can manipulate us by pimping him out and we'll all just eat it up because we've been conditioned to think he's a super genius since childhood, and therefore if he says it, we should just believe it.

He was in a really messy divorce and will probably sign onto any project in order to make back what he lost.

...are you mad because a man on TV disagrees with you?

Sjws payed him to shill for bullshit

he spoke about the rights of Transgender, and environmentalists, and as a result, there's a backlash of hateful idiots who are now hellbent on trying to destroy his reputation by claiming he's "not real science" and so on.

typical narrow-minded intolerance, the "he spoke about what I don't like, I must now destroy him" mindset.

never downloaded it sorry

its not too easy to make out, he's talking with someone off camera and he's only partially in the shot, but it's clearly his voice

from a purely scientific standpoint he's technically "right" (two beings of a species that mate but can't procreate obviously don't 'further the species') but it's pretty shocking he'd just put that out there even to a friend like that

he's in for a big blowback from his fans for sure

Not mad at all, I have no problem with him. We all get pimped one way or another. Its the pimps i dislike. But there isnt much you can do about it except ignore it. So no, not mad at all.

>Sjws payed him to shill for bullshit
[citation needed]

>We all get pimped one way or another. Its the pimps i dislike.
I don't like capitalism either.

yeah, liberals never do that to anyone

If the grass moves do you want proof of the wind?

His netflix series is the main one. Some of the episodes are OK but he becomes the king of cringe. There is even an ice-cream orgy. It's pretty weird.

good thing we don't have capitalism then.

See:

See: sex junk

What a retarded thread.

Agenda's require manipulation. Truth doesnt.

science.house.gov/news/press-releases/former-noaa-scientist-confirms-colleagues-manipulated-climate-records

He went full retard.

Lol...meanwhile...back in reality.

This clown used his status to promote emotional tripe that has no basis in science.

IOW, he ruined his credibility by being a sellout for political purposes.

He said "gender" and "expression" are two different things. As a biologist this pisses me off. I used to love Bill, but he is being way too subjective and ignoring actual science more than he should imo.

>former-noaa-scientist
>former
Makes me think.

That's one of the most eloquent responses I've ever seen on this website. It's poetic almost. Kudos user.

You just made me realize jail might be my safe space lol

I instantly imagined you getting out, seeing episode 1, shutting the tv off, and going to the police station to turn yourself in for literally anything.

google.com/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/amp/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

>dailymail
Ah yes, why don't you post screengrabs of gawker articles to top that off?

>former-noaa-scientist
>former scientist
>former

You know what they say

"You die hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain"

Me too, makes me think he was outed for not going along with the herd.

This

>They post a science.house.gov

>You post a dailymail.co.uk to counter

And the zionists win again

It is possible they serve/have served an unknown service to a community

It wouldn't matter what i quoted. You've made your mind. You won't listen to any voice that disagree with your view point. But to deny that there are any scientific arguements against global warming, is just false. But i am not surprised, since all this stuff gets pandered from the same side of the isle that supports the idea that in your mind you can be something other than what you physically are, and that others should respect that your physical make up is irrelevant. You're used to your thoughts being more important that simple facts. Its no surprise.

An actor got paid to lie to an audience.

The daily mail has been making shit up for years, most of the "another looney law from brussels" articles come from there.
Why don't you link to the ACTUAL studies?

Our trips have spoken.

Because you are equally retarded

>he was caught on camera saying how gays and lesbians were "mistakes of evolution" and how society should cull them from the herd in order to further the species

Well that doesn't make sense, evolution is evolution, gays and lesbians are part of it. If that gene is to be weeded out it will do it on it's own.

So has the washington post. Remember that tine they said clinton had an 85% chance of winning?

It's almost as if user made it up.

>its like he has a fucking army

They own 98% of all media and news outlets.

Do the research and get called an anti-semite. Fml

>So has the washington post.
Good thing I don't read the washington post.
How does that dispute my point exactly? "I know this paper makes shit up often but others do that too so it's okay"?

To bad, I liked him, feel sad watching him talk the SJW line for money, why can't he just go back to doing 5th grade science bits?

This is pretentious and written by an idiot

He cant walk away fron all those bills, afterall, he is one.

People got bummyhurt because he shilled out.

So is the washington post liberal

All papers make shit up. Every single one. I have no idea where this meme of "the media are a bastion of truth" comes from. The media have always been a sandpit run by selfrighteous bastards furthering their own ideals.

You're right. The media exaggerates on both sides of the isle. But at the moment i can't be bothered to track down every research paper associated with global warming. There are plenty that support it, and plenty that don't. You can look for yourself if you are actually interested. But i think you've settled for the half of the facts that you believe.

youtube.com/watch?v=Wllc5gSc-N8


This .... This happened.

He's a boss thats what's up. So sauce of him or gtfo

>I can't be bothered
Then why are you arguing with me if you just admitted you don't acutually have any of this elusive evidence against it?
>But i think you've settled for the half of the facts that you believe.
Show me the other "half of the facts" please because I have yet to find any that aren't nonesense.

Failed abortions look worse than that.

Shit, all these bitches have Turner's syndrome? That's good to know.

>this is all that happened
I'm dissapointed, expected something to be acutally worth the drame surrounding it. You guys will cry over anything.

Being gay was clasified as a disability until the 60's or something and being lefthanded before that I think.
Times change.

He was vocally opposed to his superiors publishing false data. He's still scientifically qualified, just not employed by them anymore.
It's a misleading statement meant to discredit him.

Or he made shit up to get famous.
There's a "former nasa scientist" going around telling people about area 51. Believe the folk with the papers, not the ones who have nothing to back up their claims.

That aren't what you believe to be nonsense. It's ecause i don't actually care enough about global warming to carry around every factoid and research paper with me everywhere i go, even if i were to buy into, i wouldn't. If it were proven to be true, i still wouldn't care. I have too many other things to do than worry about what may or might happen. That being said, I still, based on my own investigations into research from both sides of the isle, don't buy it. I think its become a tool of the left, just like gay/trans/mebtally ill rights have. You think politicians give a shit about global warming? They care about votes. That's it.

> Jesus Fucking Christ

>this is all that happened

Are you fucking serious? This is like showing up early to a brain surgery appointment - and your surgeon is watching scat porn while getting fisted in the ass. I mean yea maybe that does not take away from his ability as a brain surgeon - but holy shit man... it does not look good. How the fuck is this even science at this point?

>all that happened

Also on top of that ... when you have someone who basically wants to criminalize questioning climate change ... and this is how you are selling sexuality - your position is kind of diminished. I am sorry.

Maybe he will explain climate change by getting someone to sing about climate boners and wet rain forest pussies or some shit. It will look retarded.

Watch the series. I'd say 80% was good, but the 20% that was shit was really, really, shitty.

Either

>doesnt know what shill means
>not bothered by shills

If you arent bothered by them, you are one. Wittingly or unwittingly. If unwittingly, be open to the possibility you are as susceptible to indoctrination as anyone else is.

Exactly, they want to punish anyone who disagrees. And they call the right fascist...

m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/18/ed-feulner-democrats-would-punish-climate-change-d/

Gays and Lesbians ARE a mistake to evolution. Period.

I'm not homophobic at all, i'm not disgusted, nor do I think they "will burn in hell for their sin".

But as we know evolution, it's "Giving the next generation better genes, or more adapted to the environnment, to further the specie". That's why it's called "Evolution".

And from that "Evolution" point of view, Gays and lesbians are mistakes, since they are a dead-end branch of the specie. They won't procreate, and thus, won't give their best gene to the next generation. And if one homo had a trait that would make him superior to other, he will die without passing that trait to the next generation.

That's why we can call gays and lesbians "a mistake of evolution"

[Sorry, English is not my native language]

This. Male + female = continuation of the species. Nature does not support homosexuality.

>That aren't what you believe to be nonsense.
Grammar aside, I have evidence.
skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm
climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
I can't tell what parts of this thread are bait and what aren't, have this video, makes the same points I would anyway.
youtu.be/SI5ulKiZAoE

google.com/amp/www.newsweek.com/should-climate-change-deniers-be-prosecuted-378652?amp=1

Which is why the gay and lesbian gene over the centuries has diminished.

Just how dumb are you? lmao

This is the same tier of posting as

Personally I believe that homosexuality may be an evolutionary defence mechanism.

When a child is born deficient mentally, the brain switches the "gay" setting on to prevent the defective genes being passed to the next generation.

Our meddling is fucking up the natural order. Go ahead and be gay.. Just don't breed because you're clearly not on the same evolutionary path as the rest of the species.

My apologies for my grammar, I'm sexting my wife while she's at work, so i dont always double check what I've written on a thread on here.

It's an "american found one lefty saying something and thinks they're all alike"
Someone who doesn't mind gays getting married is not the same tier as an anarchist, retard.

Good, then you don't mind that i disagree with you.

Stop bragging.

Lol u do know almost all spices have about a 10% homosexual rate in fact male sheep have other male sheep partners for life the evidence points to homosexuality dose have a purpose in evolution mainly because almost all species has some form of it u should actually read up on a subject than assume u know every thing or what ur bigiot of a dad or mom or priest taught u

Not sure what part of that is bragging... I dont see too many people bragging about marriage.

"Thats exactly the right message Rachel"
Jesuuuus fucking christ

Also
>gender is a spectrum
>XX and XY in graphics at end

dat cognitive dissonance

Yes, and their offspring contribute....ph wait, they dont have them.

Ok fool, the Bible, the word of God says differntly

>I just got out of jail
Here's a (You) now how about telling us the story of how user went to jail and how it was in the can?

Nothing he's liked
youtu.be/LqQJrcopMUk

He got cucked

... Gay and Lesbian is not written in gene. There's no Homo-gene, you moronic moron.
Being gay as nothing to do with choice either.

You're not born with it, but you can't change it willingly.

Being gay is a TASTE.

The same way Ossies love Vegemite, and I hate it, Gay love same-sex people. They cannot change their taste, neither can I love Vegemite.

Homosexual *behaviour* is observed in many animals, yes.

EXCLUSIVE homosexuality is only ever observed in two, male rams and some sea cucumber I think.

The rest is just confused animals shoving it in the wrong hole.

Animals will fuck anything they can.