Rated 8.3 by imdb

Rated 8.3 by imdb.

How does Sup Forums feel about this film 7 years later? Was it good?

Best movie since Eyes Wide Shut

It's extremely overrated. Drawn out set pieces stitched together by a paper thin plot. "Check out how great I am at screenwriting!": The movie.

It's alright. Not great, not terrible. Should be like a 6/10.

Tarantino's best.
The ballsiest satirical attack on questionable American values since Starship Troopers.

I think it's great, could watch it a hundred times

I agree with the paper thin plot thing but it was very entertaining althroughout.

Also, I think Pitt did a good job. I particularly dislike pit, but he played the role well. All of the American soldier roles were played quite well, actually.

Overrated? Maybe. But like you said it wasn't close to being terrible.

It was okay but I feel like 90% of people who watched it missed the point.

Intelligent, nihilistic with a wicked sense of humour.

>needed more Jews

GORLAHMEE

>I feel like 90% of people who watched it missed the point.
>Tarantino is a master of subtlety and I am a master of interpretation

Quentin Tarantino is one of the worst directors of all time.

DAMN ITS BEEN 7 YEARS LE I FEEL SO OLD GOSH

I agree.
Too many people miss its subtext, either loving it because of all them "cool Nazi killing bits" or dismissing it because they think it's just about them "cool Nazi killing bits".

>being this upset that you don't understand how movies work
WHOO BRAD PITT ACTION MOVIE FUCK THOSE NAZIS UP LOL LE BEAR JEW

I liked some of the scenes (opening scene and the one at the bar were both really entertaining), but overall it is garbage. Brad Pitt's performance was far too hammy for my taste.

I too dislike the film, but your criticism of the movie is unfounded. The movie is supposed to have a simplistic plot, it's not supposed to be deeply complex. Nor was the screenwriting supposed to be grandiose in anyway, it's just your typical Tarantino dialogue. Anyway, it's an homage to war exploitation films (hint, the movie is named after one!). Considering that is what Tarantino expressly set out to do when he made this film, i'd say it's successful in that regard, don't you think?

What point? There is no point! It was an excuse to have jews kick nazi ass. Tarantino says so himself in interviews!

>Le ebin role reversal
So freakin clever, amirite??? XD

Shit opinion, fucking pleb in snob's clothing, hang yourself

The madman makes an anti Jew movie in a Jew revenge fantasy, true kino

Its one of my favorites. The first scene is fucking GOAT

...

I like it the least of Tarantino's films, desu.

It is the epitome of style over substance. The film, when broken down, is bare-bones as fuck, and the only reason it's remembered is the (admittedly fantastic) writing.

Compare that to even other hotly debated Tarantino films like H8ful 8, and it just pales in comparison. At least in H8ful, the film can stand on it's own two legs without the need for nostalgia and setpieces to carry the film.

had its moments
no idea if it was intentional, but quentin made the nazis look like the good guys

Bravery

>le point is le joos r as bad as le nazis!!!! im le enlightened r/movie user so i know ;-)
fuck off

Would have been the most ironic movie to shoot up the theater. Especially if people were laughing

But...killing nazis though...

But yeah, you're pretty spot on. The film's target audience ended up being a little off, though the majority that it hit accuately could appreciate it for what it was.

It's basically a political cartoon of the Nazi occupation of France. It caricaturizes the Americans, and the Nazis, and the French, and everyone else involved. It's not that deep, it's not meant to be. It's broad satire and action-movie wish fulfillment, set in a historical context that anyone with a high-school diploma is familiar with. Get over yourself

Hello rabbi

>It's not that deep
Didn't say it was. I said most people missed the point. A movie doesn't have to be deep for people to miss the point. People are stupid.

It was literally kino.

The only thing that botters me is that it's 7 years old.
I would have guessed 4, tops.

Yes the plot is simplistic but the dialogue scenes are well written and fun to watch. His last good film.

>His last good film.
You didn't enjoy Hateful Eight?
Django is definitely his worst, but Hateful very might be the best chamber piece since Clue.

Saw it again recently. One of my favorite movies ever.

Wish there were more Basterd shenanegans

The characters in Hateful Eight were too boring and the dialogue was just meh for the sake of making it 3 hours long.

Also using 70mm to mostly shoot in a cabin is a waste of that film stock

How is it anti jew? I got the opposite Impression.

Shalom goy

I disagree, I thought the characters were as memorable as they were unpredictable and that he made expert use of the 70mm film stock in covering just a single location.
Furthermore I liked how subversive it was in a similar way to Inglorious Basterds. Here, unlike in Django, he's not glorifying violence or revenge plots, but rather pointing out how inane and ugly they are.

Holy shit are you retarded? The whole point of the movie is to portray Jews acting like Nazis. It's a meta-commentary on how Jews run Hollywood and you can't portray them badly, so Tarantino found a way to portray them as the "good guys" but make them bad at the same time.

It's not even that subtle.

>Jews carving swastikas onto Nazis
>Jews burning down a movie theater and shooting all the moviegoers as a finale

hard to call it anti jew, but the basterds were moraly bankrupt


is a good example for that
their actions were all based on the presumtion of nazis being evil to the core, even though they are the ones doing the wrongs in this movie.

its established very early on that the nazis are the epitome of evil and that everything they get they deserve

carving swastikas into peoples foreheads is a dick move I grant you that
But motivation for burning everyone in the theater was revenge and doesn't really strike me as equal to the germans many crimes.
Is that it? How is that anti jew?

You should check out Adventures in the Rifle Brigade by Garth Ennis. I got a feeling you'd enjoy that book.

It ain't anti-Jew, though I suppose it's easy for the /stormfront/ crowd to make that assumption. Rather, it's poking fun of the "Jewish Revenge Porn" industry that sprung up in Hollywood around and after the war. WW2 Films using the same type of propaganda tools as the Nazis were using back then are still being made to this very day, and there's something sociopathic about that. The ghost of the common German soldier, that had little to nothing to do with the fate of the Jews or had any say in Nazi politics, is still being mercilessly slaughtered on celluloid and in other media, dehumanized and disposed off as something less than human by the victors. And most of us buy into that without really caring to question it.

its not at all, first scenes in the movie depict this crazed, degenerate, higher echelon nazi officer taking incredible pleasure in removing a jewish family (children included), they literally have a character that is supposed to represent that the nazis are so fucking evil that he had to go to the other side because he wasn't evil like them

It's a decent 7.5 but that's it

The basterds were completely worthless

Hans Landa and jew girl carried it

Actually, I think the point was to humanize the average SS officer, something these type of exploitation films never do.
Not to excuse Hans Landa's actions, but to show how these were usually quite normal, even intelligent people who knew exactly what role they were playing but did so anyway, because what else were they going to do in Nazi Germany during those years?

I have only two things to say about this movie:
trash
and
jews

>the average SS officer
There was no such thing.
>because what else were they going to do in Nazi Germany during those years?
I don't know, maybe not join SS?

Es war nicht gut, nein.

*sips Fanta*

>There was no such thing.
It kind of was, the SS began as a small guard unit known as the Saal-Schutz (Hall-Protection) made up of NSDAP volunteers to provide security for party meetings in Munich.
It then just sort of escalated after Himmler joined.

>I don't know, maybe not join SS?
So easy to say in hindsight, but to the average German it was likely to seem, initially at least, like a really cool gig.

They humanized that poor blueballed soldier that the movie in the movie was about. I felt really bad for him.

>It then just sort of escalated after Himmler joined.
Yes, SS from the 30s and 40s is basically a different organization.

That's were the movie's sympathies lie.
The average German foot soldier was just as humane and brave as the average allied one, but is almost never given that respect in Hollywood WW2 cinema.