Sup Forums BTFO by based Maddox

Holy kek how will you storm weenies ever recover from this? There is literally nothing wrong with being a cuck.
youtube.com/watch?v=SE6jy78tV78&list=PLJ2fDHMSFWCYaC9AEdKwM1HzrtKHsUJg6

>hey guys you don't know what the word cuck means
Meanwhile he completely misses the meaning of what it means
>it's just a fetish guys
No it isn't you idiot, it's raising or giving resources to those that are not your own.

He is the one that doesn't get it.

Maddox BTFO Maddox

>trying to literally translate a meme/slang word
Is he really that stupid?

Ever notice how liberals have to reduce themselves to drawing sick looking caricatures and mocking something they don't like instead of addressing it?

As opposed to calling it a cuck?

>Maddox
woah it's 2003 again?

Reply rhetoric to rhetoric and dialectic to dialectic.. The right is finally fighting back because likeTrump does we are finally just name calling and it's working.

Ironically, you are blind to the fact that this reveals the real problem. The problem isn't the left, it's the fact that the political debate as a whole is getting more and more infantile. Left and Right not only attack eachother based on caricatures, they have BECOME caricatures. Even in parliaments and senates you're nowadays very unlikely to see any actual debate because it's filled with partisan shitflinging contests.

okay cuck.

>Maddox

Greetings time traveler

>Yes, please tell us how both sides have to step up to the plate, and stop projecting name calling, strawmans and general bullshit as actual debate.

Here's the problem, though. The situation is intractable.

"ALL DEM REPUBLICANS IS NAZIS"
"We will rise above these infantile insults and discuss our policy objectives."
"LOL YAWN SEEEG HEIL AMIRITE? #CURRENTYEAR"

It also works the other way in more conservative areas.
"LOL LIBRUL FAGS"
"I will rise above these infantile insults. Here's why I believe what I do"
"LOL FAG TALK"

The problem as you can see isn't that people DON'T have more intellectual discussions, it's that they CAN'T. People don't respond viscerally to thoughtful discussion, they respond to emotion based charges. They dismiss anything else out of hand now

What is denotation vs connotation?

>2008+8
>linking Maddox

Kys

No, that's how democracy works user, the public are idiots so as long as there is universal suffrage this is what we must do.

Republicans have been trying for decades to discuss issues and have been utterly devestated simply by the left saying "racist."

The Russian apparently wants republicans to continue to do what's not working. I guess he doesn't want a Trump/Putin alliance

>There is literally nothing wrong with being a cuck.

Shame seeing Jimmy Kimmel turning into such a leftist pansy. He was redpilled back when he used to hang out with Adam Carolla.

>they think they're being funny as if no one has heard this word before
>not many people know what the word cuck means

Well which is it MADdox?

Cuck is literally just a generic insult for anybody who you don't like now, like faggot. The original meaning is irrelevant.

That's why the left and the right both hate Trump. He's to liberal for the conservatives and to conservative for the liberals.

The entire point behind cuck is that it is a nonsense word to throw at people to derail a conversation.
It's our version of racist.

No it means
>you want your wife to get impregnated by a black men
>you like to suck black dick and "prep the bull"
>you want to lick the nigger cum dripping out of your wife's vagina
>you want to raise Niglets

This is what cuck implies.

The word Faggot still has implications of
>wanting dicks in the butt
>sucking dick

This is why it still has a tad of sting to it

Hey guys, my wife's boyfriend's adopted stepson from Somalia told me I should have a look at this thread and website.
Can anyone tell me what a "cuck" is?

too far

Are you implying there's literally nothing wrong with the status quo? Are you implying the political class doesn't benefit from said status quo? Are you denying the "divida et impera" maxim?

>No, that's how democracy works
And that's why entire chapters of the Federalist Papers are dedicated to limiting democracy.

It's funny how cuck is a word borne from Sup Forums's fear of being replaced by black bulls. It's a term that reeks of self-hatred.

I'm sorry for being so white I had to ask that.

I think it's funny how this powerful word we are using to destroy our enemies is a direct result of autists spamming cuck porn on pol for years.

We finally took this cuck porn and turned it into a word to destroy our enemies.

The word cuck has the implications of enjoying being taken advantage of or unwittingly being taken advantage of.

There's a lot of sting to that.

He's just butthurt that he's constantly berated as a cuck, so he's trying to defuse the sentiment behind it.

Why do people take Maddox seriously? He isn't even white.

it implies weakness, submissiveness, acknowledgement that one deserves to be cut out of the gene pool
fucking sick in the head if you ask me

I'm stating your IMPLICATION is that the Left and Right are just two sides of the same coin, equally projecting the same problems onto the political sphere(the Alt Right are just SJWs guise!!!), which is complete bullshit.

Here, on Sup Forums, Libtards, Marxist Scum, Faggot, is where one-liners, strawman, and over simplified arguments, against Leftists, is all you need and can get away with. A bunch of Lads shooting Roman candles and BBguns at each other.

What the Left does, in comparison, is a full blown military bombardment of a city, artillery and all, against all forms of Conservative debate. Late night talk shows, 90% of News outlets, Universities and schools, unions... If it's not a strawman, or can't be summed up as "RACISM" it doesn't make it past the censors.

We are not equal in our individual dysfunctions or sins. And the Left's worst sin, is purposeful misrepresentation as a rhetorical device.

>I'm stating your IMPLICATION is that the Left and Right are just two sides of the same coin, equally projecting the same problems onto the political sphere(the Alt Right are just SJWs guise!!!), which is complete bullshit.
Wait just a minute here, pal. The answer is in your very sentence. Do you know why the alternative right is called alternative? Mostly because it's anti-establishment. Implying a problem with the establishment. The established right cares very little. Just look at what conservative Christian-Democrat Merkel is doing to Germany.

And the irony here is that through this partisan shitflinging you don't even realize that most of this SJW immigration safe space bullshit is directly opposed to what the left should stand for if it took itself serious. The left has always been associated with the working class. The working classes suffer the most from mass low-educatd migration as they face the most direct competition. In fact the established left has become as class-based as the conservatives they supposedly resisted against, readily claiming that those who oppose immigration are ignorant, uneducated, have low IQs, are low class etc.

Learn to read between the lines and listen before feeling insulted.

Still miss moot. The cuck that started it all.

>Trying to explain anything to a person who is not willing to listen
Don't worry guys, I'm a professional

You mean 1987 again?

>There is literally nothing wrong with being a cuck.

It was borne when moot was with that one girl and then there was an image of her kissing another guy. Is anyone here left from before Sup Forumsharbor?

Your first paragraph is correct. The hydra like splitting of the Right is mostly due to us HATING the current Conservative Establishment; The Neo-Cons. And all the Neo-Cons are; is Liberals from 20 years ago, who support Israel, and maybe pure Con-Goldstein polices(Corprate economics, liberal social policies).

Your second paragraph however, holds up the "No true Scotsmen". I usually hate the "logical fallacy" terms towards debate, but language evolves.

I can only imagine the word that was once behind "Liberal" was "Liberate", just as "Conserve", is behind "Conservatives". I'm assuming*, that when you speak of the Liberal Ideal, this the frame of reference your citing back to. Though the Liberal party long ago abandoned its roots as Libertarian in nature, and long ago considered tax and welfare, as a God forced right of the State, rather then citizen granted privilege.

There is no way for me to address the "Ideal Liberal" as its not written down anywheres and is constantly evolving. At least with Conservative, there's a frame of reference somewheres in past for what ever brand you are. But Liberalism, due to its association with "progress" is constantly changing, therefore, it's definition is the majority of the day. Of which most are garabage people.

The irony is surreal.
>Butthurt people who disagree with me use cuck as an offence.
>Meanwhile I've made an entire video about a word that Trump Supporters used to insult me when I posted an unfunny picture on facebook.

The fact he is so mad could mean he is a cuck IRL.

I gotta show this to my wife's son, he'll love it

>Your second paragraph however, holds up the "No true Scotsmen".
It looks like you don't understand the fallacy. In the figure of speech, the "no true Scotsman" fallacy applied to Scotsmen who put sugar on their pudding. However, I think both of us can agree that a Parisian is no true Scotsman. In that same way, can one truly uphold the ideas of socialism or social-democracy by acting directly against the interests of those whom that ideology associated with the most? By definition that makes such a person not a true socialist.

Unless it somehow makes sense in America. I never understood what "liberal" means in America, but it's a lot different from what it means in the rest of the world.

Why would socialists NOT support what's been previously said?

Bringing in immigrants increases their voter base. Creating a University dependent sheltered class, ensures them attack dogs for the State, and stooges to put into Federal positions.

SJWs(I hate the term), late night talk show hosts, university professors, anti-white groups(straight white males vote unproportionately Conservative), 80% of Hollywood, they all push for a goal that increases Liberal power.

Hypothetically, they use this power to help families(specifically the ones they brought in).

They are Liberals. Ideal Liberals actually, due to their effectiveness. If they included some kind of... Ethnic or maybe, Nationslistic impulse behind their actions that would inhibit this set up...

Well it'd be some kind of, Socialist Nationalism, wouldn't it?

this.

>Bringing in immigrants increases their voter base.
And that's the point where supposed socialists abandon ideology for political maneuvering. And the established right doesn't exactly oppose it because they, supporting more or less the capital holding class that wants less regulations, are perfectly fine with lowered wages. To paraphrase Zemmour, the left and the right are both whoring out the nation to immigrants and corporations respectively.

And hell, perhaps "alt right" may be the wrong term to classify all anti-establishment parties. The FN for example is very pro-worker class and is effectively what the left should've been. They even go as far as to desire the enforcing of what they call intelligent protectionism, to protect the domestic workers against unreasonable foreign competition.

>Well it'd be some kind of, Socialist Nationalism, wouldn't it?
I see what you're getting at. I know Left and Right are somewhat nebulous terms, but personally I'd place National Socialists on the left because they're just that: socialist with a nationalist bend to their ideology. They are still in favor of the working man and still in favor of a big gubmint. It just only applies to their favored ethnic group. Personally I'd call anarchist or libertarians extreme right, though in established political left-right dichotomies they're called extreme left for some reason. I'm pretty sure progressives (the "bad" leftists) have a lot to do with this, because putting Hitler on their side of the political spectrum wouldn't make them look too favorable.

What a fucking dumbass. Does this guy have autism?

A Cuck is someone whose wife is unfaithful. We use it an abstract when we personify our nations.

We agree then. The Neo-Cons are soulless money cock suckers, hence our bio-weapon Trump.... And the only real form of socialism that can work, must have nationalist or ethnic impulses, lest it turn traitor.

Both long standing principles of Sup Forums

Someone send this to Matt Groening.

Maddox is a Mormon so he really makes big cums watching his 5 wives get blacked.

Maddox is the type of person who would buy a textbook on how to think critically because it isn't something that comes natural to him. He has another video on cyclists that uses similar retard logic. Maybe people who are obsessed with mathematics and "being rational" are that way because of some deficiency within themselves. They fetishize one quality of being that they lack at the expense of all others.

Maddox confuses the shit out of me.

He can be incredibly open minded, insightful, and reasonable on some issues, and then a total fucking retard on others. Even to things that you would think he would follow the same kind of approach logically, he can have two contrasting opinions on.

It seems like he completely misunderstands WHY people use the word cuck, and his comparisons to other deviant sexual relationships definitely don't help his argument considering the type of audience he is targeting this towards. Like, I highly doubt even one person takes away from that video

>Man, I used to think cuckoldry was pathetic, but Maddox really put it into a new light when he compared it to the group orgies I actively participate in on the weekends.

I also found it weird that he completely leaves out the hundreds of years in which a cuckold was a man who was being regularly cheated on by his wife without his knowledge, thus, why it would be used as an insult.