Not a contrarian faggot

>Not a contrarian faggot
>Not a vegan (unlike the melon)
>Far more articulate than Ant Fant

Is he /ourguy/?

Other urls found in this thread:

scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=http://tier-im-fokus.ch/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/pimentelpimentel03.pdf&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm3-pETDBJnj7QfqgdWKsEKvs0nXxQ&nossl=1&oi=scholarr
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1312295/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24484612
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12442909
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603726/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764970/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21122648
scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=http://www.indiana.edu/~origins/X-PDF/Teaford%26Ungar2000.pdf&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm2d80EQWGUTily1vF8ZUcQc2lkgvg&nossl=1&oi=scholarr
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3712514/
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/784788
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16219987
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6299329
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/486478
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092700
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21118604
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14561278
m.ajcn.nutrition.org/content/70/6/1032.full
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16087975
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16188209
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12323090
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12323085
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21753065
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2756917
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1628441/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11043928
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3354491
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12748410
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21613354
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20951759
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17518696
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073139/pdf/nutrients-06-02131.pdf
eatrightpro.org/~/media/eatrightpro files/practice/position and practice papers/position papers/vegetarian-diet.ashx
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

yeah he's cool

>a fucking Pallbearer album instead of Dopesmoker or SHM for his essential 5 doom metal albums
I love him but that annoyed me

Yeah he's pretty ok don't mind him at all
his Swans guide was pretty well put together

the way he describes songs and albums actually makes me want to listen to them

and I appreciate that he is building his channel off of music appreciation rather than shitting on or praising certain artists

10x better than melon

>Not a vegan (unlike the melon)
Literally has nothing to do with music critiquing.

he shits on them in monthly reviews but the main draw of his channel is definitely his "5 ALBUMS TO GET YOU INTO _____" and "GUIDE TO _____" videos. Even in his review videos though he isn't wildly contrarian or too p4k so he's pretty good desu

that's what they all say

>called deep cuts
>doesn't cover deep cuts
He's alright though

He has some pretty good content, insightful and enjoyable to watch. Plus his fanbase isn't cancerous like melon's

Congratulations, a really basic joke has gone so far over your head that you decided to make a post about it.

>isn't a memelord like fantano
>actually knows what he's talking about unlike artv
>speaks about music that's interesting unlike spectrum pulse

He's definitely the best music reviewer we've got.

His Bowie medley was fucking sweet desu

Holy shit you're all such faggots. I mean the melon is wacky but you all like this fucking ugly cunt for real??? He talks like a pretentious shitlord and he gets all his info from wikipedia. Probably some of you fags even give him money on patreon when he's just bandwagonning in the "music youtuber" popularity explosion of the moment.

Also, he doesn't even has a taste of his own, he plays it safely always and just tries to be a faggot sucking dick all day.

He sucks. You suck. Melon is ok.

>getting this angry

I just like his review style, aesthetic and taste. I trust his opinion more than Melon. Like said, these are the best videos he does and Melon has no equivalent.

Wow. Anthony, there's no need to be THIS angry. Please stop.

I... just thought you guys liked me more :(

so he's appealing to you just because you're newfags

Yeah, just watched it.

The comments are full of memers so it feels like home.

He has the potential to become the patrician music YT review. Just needs to upload more often.

we do like you, we just want someone else now.
you're 30 already you've passed your prime.

I never really viewed Fantano's fanbase as cancerous really

He's okay, but he uses like 40 minutes to get to the point.

what? his only 40 minute videos are his guides, of which the only point is to explain the evolution of an artist and explain his thoughts on all of their albums. For that purpose for an any artist with a big discography, 40 minutes is necessary.

I think it's weird taking about him as a competitor to melon they both make very different types of videos

>patrician music
>mfw he just reviews and circlejerks Sup Forums-core

if spectrum pulse didn't spend HOURS talking about radio garbage he would be perfect. I get his motivation, considering most casual music listeners feel everything with lots of sales is gold, he's there to say nonono shit slips through the cracks...but those people will be plebs regardless, so it's really a fruitless task.

best new music critic
but it's a "5 albums to get you into" list. It's supposed to be entry level stuff and pallbearer is definitely that.

t. vegan

What did he mean by this?

>Im a consumerist shill yes please uncle same give me more MEAT I love burdening the health system and destroying the environment unlike those Faggot vegans. I don't know any in real life but one on youtube said meters should die whatta cunt! Im going to go play cod and eat bacon AHAHAHAHAH

He's alright but he literally loves everything so theres not much depth to a critique a lot of the time

t. faggot
KEK

I thought he's pretty good at first but then I realized he's just mutard who's just pretending to be "realer" then Fantano. Its pretty funny that he thinks he does it better then Fantano because he has "better" comment section. If you think there should be real polite discussion in yt comment section for cancerous mutards and idiotic r/indieheads, then I just think you're dumb.

What your videos are is that you're really just feeding them information they already know. I still haven't got a single rec out of your Sup Forums recycle channel.

Fantano at least embraces the irony and funnier side of being a youtube reviewer and cash out on it more then you ever will.

I'm too tired to fix wording but stop shilling your shit.
>tfw you read 1984 five days ago and you're expert on politics

I think he has a lot of potential but everything he's been reviewing and making guides for has been super basic and entry-level so far. Did we really need ANOTHER guide to Radiohead?

this nigga also doesn't give number ratings to albums in the monthly reviews, which is a big plus for me

this nigga good

what a pussy.

>this is what vegans actually believe

Science you dumb cunt at least be enough of man to admit that in your world self satisfaction outweighs everything else

>Channel named The Needle Drop
>Doesn't cover needle drops

scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=http://tier-im-fokus.ch/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/pimentelpimentel03.pdf&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm3-pETDBJnj7QfqgdWKsEKvs0nXxQ&nossl=1&oi=scholarr
We are done here.

2passiveagressive4me

see

Damn, you just refuted everything in heartbeat. Fine by me, remain wilfully ignorant and ruin your health.

t. spurned lover

>not a vegan
Gross

u r angry but correct.

Pallbearer is hot garbage

>vegan is bad
>*tips fedora*
kys fag

>reads a Ray Bradbury novel once

Seems nice, 8/10, introduced me to Idles
would bang while listening to Young Americans.
ALSO WTF NOT MENTIONING BLACK SABBATH IN YOUR DOOM METAL GUIDE DUDE SRSLY

I agree with you're points desu. It's a circlejerk channel

>Channel name Spectrum Pulse
>Not an autist

that's debatable

hello nu-males

Yeah, what little bitch is afraid of heart disease and cancer? And real men don't take responsibility for their own actions.

I mean people have been eating meat since the dawn of man and only a small percentage of them died due to heart disease or cancer. You're being aggressive over nothing because... that's what nu-males are good at I guess?

why are vegans so good at proving that all of the stereotypes about them true?

But really?

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1312295/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24484612
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12442909
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603726/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764970/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21122648
But of course, remain wilfully ignorant and ruin your health by all means.

He knows his shit from what I'm seeing but his accent is a bit grating.

i'll always love you anton

>I mean people have been eating meat since the dawn of man and only a small percentage of them died due to heart disease or cancer.
Funny how you didn't provide a source for your claim. And our ancestors were concerned with survival, which is different from health and often died of malnutrition.
scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=http://www.indiana.edu/~origins/X-PDF/Teaford%26Ungar2000.pdf&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm2d80EQWGUTily1vF8ZUcQc2lkgvg&nossl=1&oi=scholarr
>You're being aggressive over nothing because..
Over nothing? Heart disease and cancer are the leading causes of death worldwide. And providing evidence for claims and acknowledging reality is aggressive?
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3712514/

this is some Sup Forumsbaiting-tier shit

>tells you what you want to hear reinforcing your shit-tier taste

>I don't have any arguments, nor will I attempt to refute real arguments
>this is some Sup Forumsbaiting-tier shit

I get that the way he's saying this is melodramatic & cringey, but are people on Sup Forums actually okay with Theresa May censoring the internet?

>not writing an(t)on
Do I honestly have to do everything for you guys?

He's right though, and I'm far removed from being a socialist.
"regulated internet" is the least of our worries though, we're already defenseless in our own country.

He's right fuck is wrong with y'all?

please stop embarrassing yourself boy. don't speak unprepared

>actually providing sources for his arguments
where do you think you are? this place isn't ready for such vanguardism

people on Sup Forums hate when everyone with a platform has political views

>where do you think you are? this place isn't ready for such vanguardism
I'm not sure what's gotten into me.

You completely miss the fact that 90% of the western population eat like SHIT and do absolutely NO excercise (the people sampled in your studies)
Veganism makes people healthier because it limits them from eating the processed CANCER that the overwhelming majority of people eat
But if you aren't a limp-wristed brain-dead retard (eg: you) you don't need to limit your diet to not eat SHIT and instead realise that all you have to do is keep fit and not gorge yourself on red meat, which isn't difficult if you're hunting it yourself since it isn't easily available and is much closer to what our natural red meat consumption should be.
Of course this is far too difficult for vegans to get into their atrophied brains
>b-but the animals!
Buy organic or rear them yourself
>b-but slaughtering is inherently evil!
No it isn't, we're animals. Humanely killing your meat is a much nicer death than they would get otherwise.

Red meat only causes health problems if you're A FUCKING PLEB that gorges on SHIT 24/7 with no concern for their health like most people, veganism is a solution for people that are literally too brainwashed and domesticated to even consider getting their food from outside of a shrink wrapped package like we're supposed to.

this. All vegan studies are cherrypicked one-off comparative studies that compare a well-structured vegan diet to the SAD and then try and write off the former as some kind of curative

also, fyi

Veganism causes b12 deficiency:

jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/784788
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16219987

Veganism causes d3 and calcium deficiency:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6299329
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/486478
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21092700

Vegans have a worse memory compared to non vegans due to creatine deficiency in vegans:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21118604
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14561278

Vegans have less gains compared to non vegans:

m.ajcn.nutrition.org/content/70/6/1032.full

Vegans are deficient in omega threes:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16087975
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16188209
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12323090
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12323085

Vegans are deficit in carnitine:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21753065
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2756917
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1628441/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11043928

Vegans are deficient in taurine:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3354491

Vegans are deficient in iodine:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12748410
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21613354

Eh his tweet is pretty tame, at least he's not just calling everyone racist or xenophobic

>But if you aren't a limp-wristed brain-dead retard (eg: you) you don't need to limit your diet to not eat SHIT and instead realise that all you have to do is keep fit and not gorge yourself on red meat, which isn't difficult if you're hunting it yourself since it isn't easily available and is much closer to what our natural red meat consumption should be.
Nice glorified ad hominem attack.
>Humanely killing
I'm not even going to bother.
Cooked meat produces carcinogens:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20951759
Sedentary vegan health vs a marathon runner following a standard American diet health:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17518696
>In summary, vegetarians have consistently shown to have lower risks for cardiometabolic
outcomes and some cancers across all three prospective cohorts of Adventists. Beyond meatless diets,
further avoidance of eggs and dairy products may offer a mild additional benefit. Compared to
lacto-ovo-vegetarian diets, vegan diets seem to provide some added protection against obesity,
hypertension, type-2 diabetes; and cardiovascular mortality. In general, the protective effects of
vegetarian diets are stronger in men than in women. At present, there are limited prospective data on
vegetarian dietary patterns and body weight change, obesity and neurological disorders. Large dietary
intervention trials on the effects of vegetarian diets on obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular outcomes
are warranted to make meaningful recommendations for nutritional planning, assessment, and counseling.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073139/pdf/nutrients-06-02131.pdf

>b-but the animals
Who gives a fuck about killing animals, one of the main arguments in favor of veganism is that it's much more maintainable and environment friendly. Industrial meat production and slaughterhouses consume way too many resources, they're just not worth it.

i bet these studies are all flawless and no holes can be poked in them like in the vegan ones

Just to put an end to all of this:
>Position of the Academy of Nutrition and
Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets
eatrightpro.org/~/media/eatrightpro files/practice/position and practice papers/position papers/vegetarian-diet.ashx
>The position of American journal of cardiology on vegan diets
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603726/
I'm sure the job of American Journal of Cardiology and the Academy of Nutrition and
Dietetics is to cherry-pick research.

>all vegan studies are cherrypicked
>guys, literally, every single study ever conducted about veganism is cherrypicked, trust me guys
>here's a few studies that are totally not cherrypicked that support my viewpoint tho haha
nigga u serious?

>reddit spacing
all that you need to know about vegans

>Who gives a fuck about killing animals, one of the main arguments in favor of veganism is that it's much more maintainable and environment friendly
This is what I find is more sensible to debate. The bottom line is - why would you eat foods that cause chronic disease?

>top essential jazz albums list
>no bill evans

other than that he's pretty good

>I don't have any arguments, nor will I attempt to refute real arguments
>reddit spacing
>all that you need to know about vegans

that's not how you use the quoting function reddit friend

Just to get back on topic. Deep Cuts dude is some of the most boring shit, like I get it you like the classics but there's nothing this dude has praised that hasn't been praised countless times before. I have zero respect for this channel.

>I still don't have any arguments
>that's not how you use the quoting function reddit friend

NOT HAVING WHAT ARGUMETNS? HOLY FUCKING SHIT

I'VE DEBUNKED EVERY SINGLE "ARGUMENT" (READ: FALLACY) PRESENTED BY MY OPPONENT AND YOU JUST KEEP OND EFAULTING TO "NO YOU ARE WRONG LEL"

Oh, is this what you consider a refutation?
>reddit spacing
>all that you need to know about vegans
>that's not how you use the quoting function reddit friend

>implying people exclusively use memearrows to quote
>implying most of Sup Forums does not use them freely

lmao why are you so mad bro chill

Ad hominem doesn't invalidate what I said, I expounded the point after saying you were wrong due to being a faggot.
And literally what is wrong with killing an animal, WE ARE FUCKING ANIMALS THAT ARE DESIGNED TO KILL OTHER LIVING THINGS (hence our large brains that allow us to make tools in the first place) AND HAVE DONE SINCE THE DAWN OF MAN.
I do not advocate the meat industry, it's absolutely disgusting and DOES torture animals. Killing an animal as quick as possible, by your own hand, is not an abhorrent thing to do.

LET ME SUM UP THE DISCUSSION FOR YOU FUCKING MORONS WHO JUST BARGE IN WITHOUT TAKING CONTEXT INTO THOUGHT FOR A SINGLE GOD DAMN SECOND, IN HANDY GREENTEXT FORM SINCE YOU SEEM INCAPABLE OF COMPREHENDING ANY OTHER FORM OF COMMUNICATION:

>Guy posts that a guy isn't a pretentious moron because he's not vegan
>Idiot responds with "hurr being non-vegan is bad durr" and start spamming links like a pants on head retarded Sup Forumsack
>I point out that spamming links does not equate discussion and present arguments of my own
>Discussion ensues, I even resort to using my opponent's tactics and provide all kinds of supporting arguments for why my opponent is wrong
>Entry: you - the idiot who didn't follow the discussion and just goes in to state something completely irrelevant or something that has already been said, better yet just ignoring everything that has been said to post fallacious claims based on your own ignorance

>Ad hominem doesn't invalidate what I said
You're saying that logical fallacies are valid arguments. We are done here.
Even more ad hominem attacks.

The russian canadian dude that made a 2 hour video analysis of a single Beefheart song is the only youtuber worth any self-respecting Sup Forumstant's attention.

Bill Evans' solo career was mediocre at best

I'm genuinely fucking disappointed in humanity after this fucking retardfest. I'll never try to discuss anything above crazy legs and melonhead ever again.

>calling them meme arrows
Wew lad

>Discussion ensues, I even resort to using my opponent's tactics and provide all kinds of supporting arguments for why my opponent is wrong

What, this? See and >I expounded the point after saying you were wrong due to being a faggot.
>u r wrong coz u r an fagit haha

no gives a fuck about killing animals m8, see