Identity politics is just a thin facade to mask juvenile indignation. "Nuh uh! I can but you can't!"

Identity politics is just a thin facade to mask juvenile indignation. "Nuh uh! I can but you can't!"

But women are trash

is he wrong though?

anyone dumb enough to need to be told this will be dumb enough to not believe it and double down on whatever retarded opinion they already hold

you're wasting your time with threads like this

Opening a dialogue ain't that bad, but then again it's Sup Forums. It's already a massive women hate circle jerk

explain how the tweet is wrong

You're baiting too hard

i'm not, though
women's suffrage was literally

Lol obvious bait.

Why even post if you're not going to try? Honestly it's like OP is in class or something.

Don't get mad at men, thank your religion for that. The bible, torah and Qur'an clearly establish how women are "property" of men - like farm equipment

hes right though -_-

*tips fedora*

How about this, what's worse racism or sexism of women?

I'm genuinely curious of people's opinions now

>talib
>kweli
Non human name, why am I not surprised.

In one major facet.

Women oppress women. I believe this to be a bigger factor in women's lives than how any man treats them.

I mean, the world would be a better place if women could just get along with each other

That's a valid argument that has nothing to do with anything. Tip your cross or whatever, and go suck your priest.

>Don't get mad at men
>thank your religion
Because religion was just created out of nothing by no one. This is on par with saying "don't be mad at the person firing the gun, get mad at the gun."

This

>maybe if i call it a valid argument it will become one

>Because religion was just created out of nothing by no one.

It is in the sphere of bad ideas that people have embraced, both men and women around the world.

People chose this, when other choices were available and made more sense.

>This is on par with saying "don't be mad at the person firing the gun, get mad at the gun."

No, not exactly. With religion, you can still get angry at the deluded person with the gun, but you can understand why he did it. He has reasons why he did it, and he has the same reasons that billions more have.

No, identity politics is bigotry no matter what side it comes from.

If you can't say it without bringing up sex then it's sexist.

>Same with race.

Women are fucking emotional crybaby dumbasses when they're on the rag.

Majority of the women I know go full retard on their periods. They even claim it's the reason they act like that.

Give me a list of things women have invented. Inb4 they make babies. Pro tip: you can't cause they're retards

When priests and friars came to early America to spread their precious religion, they had to teach the natives that women are inferior, because most of the catholic bible makes no sense if you don't do that.

The natives were clearly deluded when they were under the assumption that women were political equals before religion arrived in the new world.

If you think sexism is something, then find the source of the sexism and stop that. Don't point your fingers at religious people and say "you have no reason to be sexist", because they do.

Spotted the feminist faggots

It's identity politics.

Everytime you read an article or see and hear someone say "As a black woman, I feel that yada yada yada", you're hearing identity politics at work.

Figuratively: "I'm different and special and hold a different special opinion that's more important, more different, and more special than other genders or races"

Not him but

Religion was created by god/people, which ever you believe doesn't matter in this.
Religion had stated pretty clearly, that women are lesser than men.
People follow religion, whether forced or not, it's a majority thing, so the norm is women are less than men
Science has become a forefront very recently in the time span of humanity.
Due to science and information becoming more readily available people have changed
People have changed, and religion can not, as is its nature.

So to say that the recent change in women's equality despite the x amount of years civilization has been around is not a valid point to make.

200 years is not a lot of time
The USA gained it's independence 240 years ago. Just because we don't remember doesn't mean it was that recent. People look at WW2 as a distant memory. It was only one lifetime ago.

Humanity is at the very beginning of a new age in it's history, so things are bound to be shaken up and fights to break out.

Hopefully we don't end up destroying each other and come out stillborn

>If you can't say it without bringing up sex and race then it's sexist or racist

This is the stream coming out of mainstream leftist media sources pushing socialism as though it's something good or interesting, so we know it must be true

>People have changed, and religion can not, as is its nature.

I disagree, as Christianity is pretty elastic now - with women at the pulpit and all that BS.

Islam has been immune to mental growth or intelligent behavioral changes that benefit people of the world that follow it.

...

>Islam has been immune to mental growth or intelligent behavioral changes
You must that guy called Islam then.

>all this reddit spacing

Considering the source to be completely invalid is a form of argument.

We can safely say with full confidence that feminists are as deluded as any faith based religion. So, yes the source matters in this case.

>he actually thinks that's an argument

No. Women are property.

If a homeopathic shaman tells you how to cure what ails you, we can know that anything the shaman says is wrong, because he's a shaman and not a doctor.

If a feminist talks, we can be sure it won't be interesting or useful for society. Whatever the feminist says will be boring and useless.

>ITT: Virgins

>premise 1: invalid
>premise 2: invalid
>conclusion: assumes premises
>circular reasoning
>fallacy
Argument? NOPE

We can all know that men decided that women should be able to vote, not inferior women. Women did not "win a fight" to get some new rights, as this is total nonsense if you think it's true.

Black people did not "win a fight" for equality and Jim Crow laws. White republicans decided those laws were bad and changed the world for the better.


YOU GET WHAT WE GIVE YOU, BECAUSE YOU ARE INFERIOR, AND CANNOT GET FOR YOURSELF ANYTHING.

As long as you understand this, you'll be fine. So, be nice.

Cops dont murder blacks. Blacks murder cops. Blacks shooting cops is dangerous and violent crime. Cops shooting blacks is self defence.

Nope, can't find holes in the reasoning, must be right.

...should we tell him guys?
do you think he knows?
do you think he even knows?
that that's not an argument?

>you post bait
>someone takes your bait
>they argue you have no argument
>they have no argument
>you argue with the no argument
>who is the real bait

Women beg the more superior for things, rights, to be treated as equals

The same for blacks.

This is when you know you're not in power and you don't have the intelligence or resources to become equals with men.

Table scraps are better than nothing, but you will continue to beg anyway.

This post is an example of "Please most superior one, stop being mean.... "

Women begging the mercy of men.

White people are pretty good for even allowing blacks to live, and allowing women not to live in total subjugation.

Be happy with that, because if we decide things should be worse for you; they easily could.

>mfw he thinks this is somehow now a valid argument

How is it not.

Pls show your work on why its not AND GIVE CORRECT ANSWER


Oh wait..YOU CANT

He's baiting you, are you fucking dense or something

>He's baiting you, are you fucking dense or something

total non sequitur

Do we have some feminist here that would like to beg for table scraps?

we're all ears.

Listen nigger. Everyone and just about everything on this board is BAIT. WE ALL GET IT. doesnt mean i wont reply with a joke or something.

Youre a fool for taking anything seriously here..boy.

1/23 for getting a reply. Heres your (you)

>he thinks using caps to convey a louder tone of voice somehow makes it an argument
>appeal to emotion
>fallacy
Scanning for arguments....
NONE FOUND

Haha. You know if they reveal themselves YALL BETTER DEMAND TITS WITH TIMESTAMP. Or no dice. Dont give them the time of day

...

OK, feminists and social justice warriors, we get it; you're sad.

Sad

sad

sad

Lol TYPING IN ALL CAPS DOES NOT EQUAL YELLING OR W/E YOU THINK. I JUST LIKE USING LARGE FONTS.

STILL DIDNT COME UP WITH ANY SORT OF COUNTER TO YOUR BAIT POST BECAUSE ALL YOU CAN DO IS PARROT BS.

Have a click baity day ;)

-2/34

We understand you're inferior and even you know it. So, what do you want?

We'll look into it.

Is this really what both sides of the political spectrum have to offer? People flinging mud back and forth at eachother? How hard is it to fix problems in this world without playing the blame game all the time? Does blaming white people, black people, men, women, fucking animals actually do anything but sow more discord? No, it doesn't. How about instead of blaming people and calling them "inferior" or "nazis" or "cucks" we just try to fix the problems that everyone seems to have put in the back seat in lieu of just blaming groups of people so they feel accomplished but have actually done nothing?

I don't know why I typed all this.

oh god
now they're just resorting to ad hom
what happened to the arguments people used to come up w/ it?
why aren't there any in this thread?
btw, none of those are arguments
take a philosophy course or somethin

...

No u. Fuck off with giving attention to anons who reveal they are female to get attention.

Follow the unspoken unwritten rules or fuck off. Got it. Get it? Good Nigger

...

>I don't know why I typed all this.

ahhh, don't sweat it. Anything you have to say is more valid and interesting than the feminist in the thread.

Thankfully, we have a pecking order, and you know it's nice.

This thread shows that both sides of the political spectrum inhabit another spectrum entirely.

>Women saying men are trash is righteous anger


Women saying men are trash is women saying "please sir, may I have another?"

LEL. Im still WAITING for a counter from that one user itt. NO ONE HERE CAN ARGUE JACK SHIT IN AN APPROPIATE WAY. So why even freak out about it??
What do you expect from a board of children,autists,and real life faggots?

Also stop lying to yourself. This place was never good. If youre truly old you would know that.

...

it's just ridiculous
these people actually think they have brain activity going on upstairs

...

No, there's no pecking order, there are just problems that have to be fixed and those that think they are better than others.

I agree.

>this thread
Does Sup Forums just leave no bait untouched anymore

She's not wrong

I'm still waiting on my answer to my question of "What's worse, racism or sexism towards women?"

Dude
Saying that the other person has no arguments doesn't constitute an argument either

Also, repeating it like a raging autist kinda underlines that you have no argument besides "you have no argument"

Don't act like the Great Philosophy King when you're closer to a parrot

Anything to distract from the ylyl, trap, porn, and gore threads.

m8
hate to break it to you
but that's not an argument
maybe try looking up how to structure a valid and sound argument then come back to me

Because you speak the greater truth
Maybe someday humanity will evolve out of shit-flinging and actually start working towards whichever greater good seems attainable

Some women are whiny fucking cunts - evidence: some women you meet

Some dudes are whiny fucking cunts - evidence: this post and OP generally

I don't judge people on their gender man - I judge them on whether they're a whiny fucking cunt.

Samefag

I wasn't making an argument, I'm not the dude you were arguing with. Just pointing out your extreme retardation.
I don't even have an opinion on feminamisnism

The men that are whiny fucking cunts have falsely given women/feminists some sort of false status, and feel their horrible arguments have weight enough to make them whine.

They feel compelled to respond for what reason, I don't know.

>he thinks non-arguments are a valid way to try and point out character flaws
not
a
fucking
argument

>I don't even have an opinion on feminamisnism

Because it's invalid. It's like holding an opinion on some religious assertion. It doesn't mean anything.

Nope - OP isn't doing that, and he's still a whiny fucking cunt. Wrongo, spunk-junkie.

No idea... he needs a woman to tell him.

Op probably fucked off from this sperg fest, most likely to suck cock or something

It's all just bitterness.

Cultural appropriation? You're just booty blasted that johnny bullied you for wearing a dot on your head at school and now want to take it out on Wendy at the Halloween party.

Micro aggression? It's easy to yell at the girl who wanted to touch your nappy hair vs your local kkk chapter.

Rape culture? No we won't deal with actual rapists with any sort of effort but instead hold all of non rapist society accountable for the monsters in the world. Much easier and much more satisfying.

It's all just an easy way for these people to vent frustration on easy targets like skinny white numales.

>The symphony playing in this thread right now

*for ants

Identity politics are a ruse to keep the masses from seeing that corporations are turning our country into an oligarchy.

Now THIS..is how you make an argument