Look at me guys, I'm very smart!

>Look at me guys, I'm very smart!
-Le intellectual music guy

Other urls found in this thread:

scaruffi.com/politics/gays.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Well he's smarter than you

Doubtful.

Does he know what a paradox is?

Nothing reeks of intelligence more than complaining about meme intellectuals on Sup Forums

it actually makes sense
lots of things are innovative
but nobody cares (accepts) until a bunch of hacks exploit (imitate) the innovation

yeah but it's also high school tier philosophy

>"hey guys, the world is like unfair"

What's wrong with this exactly
So
A lot of quotable things are pretty fucking obvious they only become quotable because they're said eloquently

Wait what? The point isn't that it's unfair.

Thats what he's trying to imply stupid.

Are you retarded?

>defending scaruffi

Scaruffi has done more in his life than you could do with ten.
This thread is a failure on several levels.

what did he mean by this?

How many books have you written on Art, Hiking and AI?

>Attacking scaruffi by being an idiot
You sure showed him

>writing pretentious topic equals intelligence

art, hiking and AI are "pretentious"? are you kidding me?

poptimism and anti-intellectualism are destroying society.

he is right.

>self-published

so? again, how many books have you written, faggot?

If its that easy to publish books, I will probably write one now and maybe sent it out for free.

This just means the truly innovative people aren't appreciated but later copycats are?

pic related, faggot. You can order a physical copy right now

The innovation itself is not appreciated until copycats arise and legitimize it

>Taking credit for the effort of many people

Oh? And how many books have you published, faggot?

Just one

>10/11/2011 17:11 - piero .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·..·´¯`·. scaruffi wrote:
>What you are saying is
>1. We created something called Wikipedia and established some rules
>2. We expect every person to learn and comply with these rules
>3. Otherwise we take no responsibility for what happens to you

>Scary, isn't it?
>It's like me inventing a new game and forcing you to participate even though
>you never asked to. And if you don't, we'll have your car vandalized and we'll
>take no responsibility for your car being vandalized.

>It's a bigger version of the spammers who automatically add you to their
>mailing lists and then tell you "if you want to unsubscribe, go to this
>website [hoping that it works] and click on 22 lines". I suspect you are
>not too happy when this happens to you.

>You would react very differently if Wikipedia were charged $1 for every time
>that YOU post something that is not true
>(please do not reply "we didn't post it - the people of the world posted it":
>your website, your responsibility).

>Maybe i should create an anti-Wikipedia guerrilla movement that will unleash
>thousands of freedom fighters worldwide each vandalizing hundreds of Wikipedia
>pages every day. That works, right? I think it complies with your own rules.
Why didn't his anti-Wikipedia guerrilla movement take off, Sup Forums?

The topics itself are not pretentious. It's the way he writes about them that is.

It really says something that the only insult you can come up with is
>Le smart man XD

Bill Gates?
>look at me guys I hab so many moniesXDXD!1!1!1

Will Bill ever recover from this?

Why don't scaruffifags just stop defending him if you just get so pissed off?
Seriously, its not like he physically needs you to defend him on Sup Forums to give him life.

scaruffi.com/politics/gays.html
LOL

Why don't anti-scaruffifags just stop attacking him if they get so pissed off?
Seriously, its not like he physically needs you to attack him on Sup Forums to give him death

>Philosophy is the art of saying something incredibly stupid and making it sound incredibly intelligent.

because neo-Sup Forums is filled with p4k clones that hate the fact that Scaruffi has a decent opinion
I'm indifferent towards the guy, but seriously just leave these shitty posts alone, you're not physically inclined to reply to these kids.

reminder that scaruffi doesn't even like rock music

...

I actually like reading Scruffy from time to time, I've just spent years forcing the pedo meme because I wanted to have a serious discussion about the Beatles

How many books has he written on Thermodynamics, Parabolic Sequence, and Macular Degeneration? Oh shit, zero.

What a smart individual.

I posted "Doubtful." I've published 4 books, and 3 others as a collaborating author.

>Certain knowledge is more valuable than another

Kys

b-b-but you're posting bad things about Scaruffi on Sup Forums, you're supposed to be a neet user...

It is better to be miles above everyone else on earth in a subject like rock music than to be a mediocre thermodynamics writer.

That's no your book, nor have you published it. It was written by /lit/, you took no part in it.

>tfw "how many books" isn't a valid Scaruffi-defense-option anymore
What now lads

I mean he's not wrong, but that's such an obvious and pseudo-intellectual statement to make. Of course innovation gets copied.

If you support the mindless marching on off science towards our inevitable mass suicide than you're retarded.

>reminder that this person unironically believes that Fred Durst is a better vocalist than Ian Gillan, Ozzy Osbourne, Elvis, John Lennon, and Paul McCartney

maybe not michael jackson but what have the others even done?

Not wrong

>calling others pseuds
>completely misses the point

It's as if he slipped in one retarded ass hot take just to see if anyone would notice

>this person unironically believes that fred durst had a bigger influence on the world of music than elvis, morrissey, ozzy osbourne, lennon, and mccartney

Do Scaruffi fans enjoy Limp Bizkit?
Or do they just pretend to so they please their messiah

...

I like how you don't show that these don't have a numerical order

Now I understand why Scaruffi likes 14 year olds
Its because he himself is also a 14 year old

This actually just made me loose faith in scaruffi

he's perfect for his band. he's got tons of charisma despite being kind of embarrassing, that's pretty unique i'd say. obviously this isn't about actual technical singing capabilities now is it?

What Scaruffi says in this quotation is false, though; an innovation does not ever become an imitation. There must have been a extended lapse of reason when he made this claim. He might have meant to say, "when it has been imitated," however, if such were the case, there would be no paradox.

t. Scaruffi hater