What is the only network worth watching and why is it Fox News?

What is the only network worth watching and why is it Fox News?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8FfdFV5v2Nk
splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/alternative-right
adweek.com/tvnewser/john-mclaughlin-misses-first-mclaughlin-group-in-34-years/302033
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Because they're fair and balanced and blondes.

attractive women with long legs, hilarious 'debates', interesting guests, intellectual diversity.

Except it's not and its awful

>Think zir's on Reddit

Adorable.

I like MSNBC, yes they're liberal, but they didn't bend over to be fisted like CNN did by the DNC.

But I don't?

remember the good ol' days when cartoon network was the only channel you needed to watch?

They're the only network worth watching when it comes to shit going down on the streets, like riots or shootings and the like. This is indisputable. CNN and MSNBC and the like are hilariously awful at reporting that kind of shit.

For everything else though, nah.

Because you're an alt-right Sup Forums-tard who fears people of different skin color

I never watched cartoons desu. My parents only watched cooking shows, the news, and VH1, which is what I ended up watching on my own time, if I wasn't gaming.

they're all shit, CNN though is by far the worst

Can you define alt-right for me?

Can you define it first

because fuck those libtards amirite xD

Most kino anchor OAT

>GOY NEWS

>Sup Forums poster
>hates Zionism constantly jokes about Jews
>will use the Gaza conflict in an argument that Israel (rightly) shouldn't grab land and as an example Jews
>watches Fox News and Murdoch owned media

Can someone explain this to me

>tfw Oderus Urungus will never be an Interplanetary Correspondent on your hack cable news show.

youtube.com/watch?v=8FfdFV5v2Nk

>network
>worth watching

gas yourself, you filthy jew

>Turn on Fox News
>expect what liberals keep stereotyping Fox News as

>It's a report on a bill about illegal immigration or government spending or something
>Host calmly chats with two other political commentators
>"What do you think about this bill?"
>"I think this bill is good because [Reason X], but it has drawbacks, like [Reason Y]".
>"Interesting. What do you think, other commentator?"
>"I think this is a bad decision for Congress to make. In addition to the benefits, we need to consider drawbacks like [Reason Z]."
>"Also a good point. You both make interesting arguments. Thank you for your time. Coming up next, the weather."

>Check out "redeye"
>Armond White is making fun of movies

I don't get it.
I thought this was the supposed brainwashing boogeyman that you keep claiming is destroying America. Why is it that outside of O'Riley and the other shows that are clearly marked as opinion-pieces like a Talk Show, that 90% of the channel calm and reasonable discussion among various guests and commentators? They had a fucking two-hour biography on President Kennedy the other day.
You really think that's somehow worse than literally editing a phone call to make it sound more "racist"?

Anyways what are some other decent news channels that get a lot of hate, but aren't all that bad?

But you just listed an awful channel and you pay for cabel television

All news networks have hidden agendas.

Radio is usually a little better but not by much. Try listening to NPR half of the reporters are unbiased and one that are, are blatantly obvious.

Because you can have people like Maajid Nawaz voice their concerns about fundamentalist Islam, Islamism and radical Islam without being called an Islamophobe.

they were once the best thing ever, when we had things like samurai jack and ed edd n eddy, times got dark for a while but with the resurgence of toonami and the existence of the regular show and adventure time, there is hope for the future

Why would you use a label to describe someone if you have no idea what it means?

I'm actually curious what it means too, I keep seeing it thrown around and I don't feel like delving into Sup Forums to get an answer.

But you know what it means

splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/alternative-right

They're the only news-source that's not actively being biased.

>short summary
>slightly more detailed summary

Wow, such bias.

>genocide of Native Americans
>enslavement of Africans

But democrats did that?

Anyone who isn't gobbling SJW cock.

Hahahahahaha

Why would I? I'm not even Right, let alone whatever Alt-Right is.

Thanks.

But alt-right is sjw

I don't like fox because they blatantly mislead people. For example, I was watching a segment where they were bashing democrats for not voting for Zika funding. The truth of the matter is that, the dems didn't vote for it because the bill was dirty. It would have slashed funding to other health related issues and it didn't even include the amount of money that the president asked for. However the dems wrote a clean bill, which had nothing but zika funding with the appropriate amount of money. The republicans voted it down. Fox never mentioned this.

SJWs are white nationalists?

Yeah bro, there's totally no race-baiting in CNN's description.

They were being totally unbiased with that account.

RIP in pieces only agenda-free pundit show on TV

adweek.com/tvnewser/john-mclaughlin-misses-first-mclaughlin-group-in-34-years/302033

>it's a Hibernians pushing Hiberian controlled media episode

That's correct.

my man

>splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/alternative-right

>extremist-files

Sounds like it will be a fair and unbiased analysis.

White nationalists are by definition social justice warriors

What should be gleaned from this is that you should never trust any media outlet to actually provide you with the unbiased truth on any matter, and that at best they're only good for letting you know what people are talking about at the moment so you can dig around for the truth yourself, if you feel so inclined.

Doesn't matter if it's "mainstream" media or otherwise, everyone has an agenda and everyone has a spin.

>I'm such a biased SJW that I interpret SJW bias as "fact" now.

OK bro.

>splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/alternative-right

I like how your alt-right 'definition' goes to a hotlink with the words 'extremist' also companioned along.

This is not what the the sum of all the right truly believes. Sure there are some crackpots but you are only further creating the divisiveness if you can sit there and think ALL right leaning voters buy into this crap you've posted.

The alt right is hilariously easily triggered

>le two sides of le same coin meme

>ALL right leaning voters

Why would you think that's what anybody meant by "alt-right"?

Fox is pretty shit but MSNBC is the devil.

People in the know get their news from SPAN and NPR. Al-jazeera, BBC, and RT as supplements.

>try listening to npr
>the reporters are unbiased

opinion discarded, fuckface

alt-right is a term for right wing people who don't care about typically neocon policies safeguarding christian values and instead are more focused on nationalism and immigration. often seen as racist because of their opposition of sjw crybullying and lack of tolerance for racial privileges such as affirmative action, section 8 housing and other government programs.

...

honestly the likeliest scenario is the commentator(s) didn't even know that

>It's the "disagreeing with anything for any reason = 'being triggered'"-meme

I love this meme.

Right-leaning voters include old people, people with jobs, and the alt-right

They are though.

Also when did I ever suggest I agreed with either. You're both intolerable go outside

>span

CSPAN*

The hypothesis was all viewers of Fox News fall into that this alt-right category.

>NPR
>AL-JAZEERA
>BBC
>RT

This bait is too rich for my taste

But its true

Explain yourself.

>Try listening to NPR half of the reporters are unbiased

Holy shit, this level of delusion.

does alt-right just mean anyone that isn't a liberal now or what?

>What is reading comprehensions.

:^)

>pointing out the main reason a story has national coverage is race bait
>shit like this isn't
yes, Fox is completely innocent and it's just the other networks that are pushing an agenda

I don't like the BBC, desu. I was watching the news during the whole Brexit fiasco and the amount of disinformation was heart breaking.

Well I guess that means anyone who has an opinion on social policies is a blithering idiot.

Thanks.

Then I guess that means you are "triggered" by Sup Forums discussing things.

...

>People in the know get their news from SPAN and NPR. Al-jazeera, BBC, and RT as supplements.

tbqh fox is about as unbiased as it gets right now

>NO GUYS, REALLY, ITS TOTALLY UNBIASED REPORTING SINCE IT MATCHES THE BIAS I HAVE

This is what a brainwashed SJW looks like, Sup Forums.

I stand by my sentiment that npr is liberal garbage.

Eat a dick, faggot.

That's what it looks like to me.

For us or against us mentality.

It's why fuck-all ever gets done because everyone (and by everyone I mean red and blue) buys into this horseshit circle jerk we call a democracy.

There is no human being on the planet Earth that is unbiased.

>he watches Hibernian media

I hate fox with a passion, but I'll give them a pass, because other networks do the same thing. They don't acknowledge in house conflicts.

So more information = bad now?

wew. I know Fox News is for idiots but c'mon.

You should try listening to it sometime.

alt-right is the label Sup Forumstards get because they complain that conservative, libertarian, and white-nationalist aren't accurate in describing their special snowflake philosophy

Yes, because ardent Nazis are as common and widespread on the Internet as SJW's and feminists, i.e. mainstream forces that are deciding elections at this point.

Why not accuse your opponent of being a member of the Whig Party while you're at it?

>doesn't respond to the picture and comment
>just repeats what he said previous in all caps
thanks FOX viewer

Honestly there's no reason for them to. Every other source is covering, Fox pretending to be unbiased about themselves would just make them look foolish.

I've listened to it enough.

I reiterate, eat a dick, you fucking faggot.

>Yes, because ardent Nazis are as common and widespread on the Internet as SJW's and feminists

When did I suggest this

Millenials gonna millenial.

>SJW's and feminists, i.e. mainstream forces that are deciding elections at this point.
Get outside sometime, dude.

If you can't see the obvious spin there, I don't know what to tell you.

>this entire thread

Pretty much.

It's the new boogey-man umbrella-term that SJW's and Hillary-voters are using.

Not an atheist?
Alt-Right.

Did you call Bruce Jenner a "man"?
Alt-Right.

Are you vocally criticizing BLM?
Alt-Right.

Do you NOT think a Christian bakery should be financially crucified for politely declining to cater an event that goes against their politics?
Alt-Right.

It's basically the new version of calling anyone who isn't a liberal "Sup Forums", but SLIGHTLY more subtle.
And I mean SLIGHTLY.

>It's the new boogey-man umbrella-term that SJW's and Hillary-voters are using.

No it's not lol.

This guy has a point.

But to be honest, I'm just here for the shit-talking.

The media are the king makers though.

>Feminazis and SJW's aren't at a height of influence right now.

I wish I could be this deep in denial.

Native Americans attacked and genocided other tribes

Native Americans owned black slaves

Native Americans were given soverign land and major Casinos were built for them (using white money and technology)

Blacks sold each other into slavery

Despite white people ending slavery in their nations almost 200 years ago, slavery still continues in Africa. Right now. In 2016. Millions of people.

Muslims took a much higher percentage of black slaves than whites did.

Muslims took 2 million white slaves.

To this day, the Middle East, Sub Saharran Africa, and any area where Native Americans live are all unmitigated shit holes. Because of THEM.

This is what the alt right is.

Milo confirmed it for me too.

...

Reality and inexperience seems to be proving me right and you wrong.