I know it sounds weird but for some reason since i was very young I have had a fantasy "sexual" Of being eaten alive...

I know it sounds weird but for some reason since i was very young I have had a fantasy "sexual" Of being eaten alive, It has got to the point that I cant orgasm unless the guy is biting me very hard . Does anyone else have a dark fetish ?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=g1nXKID12j4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

...

...

Kill yourself. Problem solved.

...

...

...

OP, you masturbating to these pics? Which ones?

It's called the "Vore Fetish"
There are any number of boards dedicated
to this unique expression of sexuality.
Just google it and have fun.

youtube.com/watch?v=g1nXKID12j4

...

I didnt know it was on youtube Thank you

...

...

messing with something on /d/ that's related to this. "Endosoma" is the term for when vore ends in death/digestion right?

...

Bumping for interest

...

Being devoured is number one thing that every creature on this planet are genetically programmed to avoid.

Of all fetishes this makes absolutely no sense at all.

...

Cock guillotines... trying to become one of my fetishes.

...

because you're assuming people have genetically program behavoir
>check your premises

It's the most basic instinct. Only parasites lack this behavioud and they try to become eaten so they could find a host.

And you're assuming that people do not, even though we are animals and all animals have instincts, get your shit straight.

I dont know why i am this way but if a man wanted to eat me alive id let him

people don't have instincts and you are literally looking at an example of a contradiction between reality and the idea that they do. Its a great religion you guys have

...

Getting spit-roasted and eaten by a cannibal?

It's called basic biology you retard. Even if you try to justify your defects and sick affinity for some unnatural acts, it's scientific fact.
I hope you get eaten, that way everybody wins.

(I'm not into this fetish)
he obviously doesn't have this instinct, he doesn't have the associated behavoir.

your determinism isn't about scientific facts, its philosophy and assumptions, try reading more.

>living things have no instinct to avoid being eaten
>they try to avoid being eaten

Pick one or just link me a credible source to this claim.

he wants to be eaten, how could have an instinct that dictates he avoid being eaten? This is a straight logic problem. This is a contradiction between reality and what you believe, will you question your belief or bury your head in the sand?

...

...

>people don't have instincts

Are you retarded?

Next you're going to tell me that humans aren't animals. Fucking christ.

I dont even know anymore what you're trying to say here. You must be trolling.

>black widows
>praying manitises
So some creatures are consumed post sex to provide nutrients.

has anyone seen the series where theres
a girl with a pert snake that she lets eat her
while she takes pictures and posts them
online?

you say there is an instinct
explicitly opposed to this and that this makes no sense. His interests don't line up with your beliefs, his sexual desires do not conform to the that an embedded function keeps him from wanting to be eaten. That's proof there is no instinct for this. This is called "proof by contradiction". You can't bring yourself to see this because the determinism is part of your religion and you can't accept criticism or question anything about it. Your behavoir is also inherently anti-scientific.

A large majority of human beings share a large majority of common behaviors, as commonly shared by human ancestors.
A large majority of living species avoid being eaten. It could be said that a large majority of life has the neurological setup and or biology which causes this behavior.
Does it apply to every single human being? No. However, it applies to an extremely large majority of human beings.
Does it apply to every single life form? No. A large majority of sentient life? Yes, and then some.

And if they are lucky, they will escape with their lives. They arent always devoured and the fact you still carry on with this nonsence, proves that you are mentally retarded. Either you're arrogant as fuck who cant get ovet the fact that you're wrong or just plain fucking stupid.

meaningless, you frame the idea of common behavior around and average, you can find averages of random numbers, there doesn't even need to be anything relating those ideas for there to be an average.

No behavoir has a direct chemical cause, you should read some of that biology more, they admit that. Determinism is an assumption, its used to interpret observations, its not the only explanation that fits anything.

>That's proof there is no instinct for this.
>because it doesn't apply in my one small and isolated example, it doesn't apply and exist at all
Nice anecdotal logical fallacy.

>"proof by contradiction".
Except it's not proof.
Do I sense a Strawman logical fallacy?

>makes no sense
>your beliefs
>determinism
>religion
can't accept criticism or question anything about it
>your behavior is inherently anti-scientific
Are you building up some Ad Hominems?
Some To QuoQue?

Ha, long time since I've seen the dolcett stuff.

Stuff used to trip me out. All those women so excited about getting speared through their cunts and eaten. What a fucked up fetish. Many happy faps anyway.

moar?

actually it not applying in one case invalidates a law. You say people have instincts that oppose this, here's a person that doesn't oppose this, that makes your statement false

this is why if you ever learned rhetoric, you don't use words like "always" and "never" because they leave you exposed to this

>meaningless
Delusion.

>you frame the idea of common behavior around and average, you can find averages of random numbers, there doesn't even need to be anything relating those ideas for there to be an average.
The fuck are you on about, mate?

>No behavoir has a direct chemical cause
u wot m8?

>you should read some of that biology more, they admit that.
Lel; nice vauge statements in order to cause me to release some arguments and possible information about myself so you have something to work with to make it easier to argue with me and possibly make me get upset and emotional.

>its not the only explanation that fits anything.
k

...

>that makes your statement false
I wasn't the faggot you were originally arguing with, faggot.

...

...

>large majority
averages don't imply an orderly cause like that, we frame averages arbitrarily, and random numbers have averages. Saying its a law because a vast majority of things we encounter do it, is not actually supported.

again the point is, OP violates your natural order, are you going to blindly insist on this order in the face of a contradiction? If so, remember this the next time you criticize someone's beliefs

...

Scum

...

>let me know when they put IDs back in

Hot.

...

...

moar

My guess is that people with this particular fetish are either really into the idea of eating others or they're infected with some weird bacteria/parasite like that one that makes mice actively seek out cats.

I'm into vore too. Karbo is god. I've cum to that pic so many times.

I know I'm on the predator side, but the vast majority of vorarephiles are into being prey. That's kind of hot conceptually, thinking that there's willing prey out there, but it's unfortunate in that most of the porn caters to prey rather than predator.

shit nasty degenerate fucks most retarded fetish idiots

>Not even making a point
Correctly considered averages don't consider outliers, especially degenerate ones. Only a moron would think that a one in a million fringe case even matters.

>OP violates your natural order
Not my natural order, THE natural order. OP is probably making the fetish up for attention anyways. Seems like snowflake shit.