I have a fetish for small women about to fuck big dicks. more like this. bonus points if oc

i have a fetish for small women about to fuck big dicks. more like this. bonus points if oc

Other urls found in this thread:

xvideos.com/prof-video-click/pornstar/jennifer-bliss/11048862/tiny_cockloving_teen_takes_on_a_very_big_dick
www
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

"Fetish for small women"

post moar

...

op is a pe do

What are you implying by "small women"

...

...

...

thats hot

Go back to the sea lion thread

"Chicks pussys are only 4 inches"

Name of the girl?

that is actually true when the vagina isn't aroused.

Also depends on the size of the girl. Vaginas aren't some mathematical equation, the depth is going to vary from person to person.

I was just shit posting

Literally BS. Any woman will tell you having their cervix rammed is very painful. Not to mention that pleasure nerve endings are in the shallow range.

And some girls LOVE the feeling of having the cervix touched. While other girls just find it super painful.

you should read that picture again. or I'll just quote wikipedia:
>During sexual intercourse in the missionary position, the tip of the penis reaches the anterior fornix, while in the rear-entry position it reaches the posterior fornix.

>Some women receive enjoyment from stimulation of the fornices, while other women say that their fornices cannot be stimulated without stimulation of the cervix, which may be painful.

>The fornices appear to be close to one reported erogenous zone, the cul-de-sac, which is near the posterior fornix.

it's not just smashing her cervix like a brute.

>cervix
>pleasure zone

read I know this is Sup Forums, but this level of wizardry is too much

Suzy Berhow

>fetish thread turns into sex ed

That's the 2nd most ridiculous picture of female anatomy that I've ever seen.

I've done it to two girls, both times by mistake, and they were not happy.

Yeah....this is PURE bullshit.


It's only 4" long BUT it stretches in all directions, particularly when aroused. That said, girls who don't have sex regularly encountering a big guy can experience the incredibly painful thrusting into the cervix. Some will just bear it out of wanting to please their lover, others WILL stop the show and ask him to go shallower or the particularly crafty/experienced ones will simply change positions to one that has a shallower total depth.

Porn though? they condition their bodies to take insanely long objects. They actually desensitize and re-arrange their inner layout to accommodate 9"-12" surgically enhanced dicks and objects.

Take a look at the transverse colon and rectum positions and tell me how a massive cock gets in those. Same deal.

When a girl is turned on it softens, and yes, they enjoy a little light tapping on it, especially if you roll past it and into one of those fornix zones the pic illustrates. 7.5 inch dicker, have bottomed out in many a vagina.

Nothing on iafd
Nothing on freeones
Nothing on the hub of porn

just image search it next time friendo
its jennifer bliss

What was the first?

The only real way to please a woman

>Yeah....this is PURE bullshit.
Except it's not.

>BUT it stretches in all directions
ELONGATES, not stretches. big difference. and sexual arousal is one of those things that triggers the elongation like my picture shows. it literally forces the cervix and uterus to ascend in an almost mechanical manner.

Does it make the "Transformers" sound when this magical retardation occurs?

does your cock???

Retarded virgin.

found the virgin lol

fucking post moar pictures faggots

You haven't ever wondered where the rest of the inside parts disappear to, have you?

SAMEFAG

I once touched a girls knee and i could smell the vagina

i laughed way too much at this

like with pretty much every single educational graphic in existence, it's deliberately made that way so oblivious fucks like you "get it". sadly, the people who made the picture sorely underestimated the stupidity of their audience.

nice try, virgin.

Are you trolling or have you just never touched a pussy?

No and no, I'm not a virgin, faggot.

Here the sauce I think xvideos.com/prof-video-click/pornstar/jennifer-bliss/11048862/tiny_cockloving_teen_takes_on_a_very_big_dick

Doth protests too much, virgin.

clearly you have no idea how that colloquialism works.

HINT: a single refutation of a baseless assertion is not "too much" in this context...or really ANY context.

truth

op my dick aint the biggest but she tiny.

>like with pretty much every single educational graphic in existence

LOL. Educational.

That has to be from some "male enhancement" advertisement.

This is what an education graphic looks like.

...

Found it

www spankwire com/Teens-Love-Huge-Cocks-Tiny-teen-takes-fat-cock/video2059601/

at almost 9" it's really easy to intentionally cause someone pain during sex.

However, from the right angles rough sex seems to be extremely enjoyable for women. My preference is 5'4"

>changes in physiology

LOL

Maybe movements of muscles and fascia, but no, I assure you, her physiology does not change.

Also, nice source.

wp

damm it. I accidentally googled that instead of putting it in the address bar and the advertisement that came up for google said "Looking for underage porn? Get confidential help...."

prove it

just google it yourself. As is, don't put in the periods.

for me it just says no results

>Say No To White Boys
Be racist yeah why not

yes, no results for the search. But there was an ad.

haha. perfect ad placement

You fucking retarded? put the dot in the .com part you newfag.

are YOU retarded? That's not what this was about

>Googling a URL

It's 4am. I meant to put it in the address bar, instead I put it in the search bar.

>stronger sperms
my fucking sides

>those hairy arms and midriff

i actually kinda like it, adds some character yaknow?