Why do conservashits defend income inequality ?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=FNtyV0CXfzU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

here is your free (you) commie

Because I'm a part of the 1% and I'm a selfish bastard. Give me one reason to give away my money.

Reminder: the labour theory of value is wrong and always will be.

Natural effort and skill inequality

I don't entirely. But then I see niggers on EBT, using white, non-kike tax dollars to continue nigging and killing white people.

Thanks to the 1 percent manipulating the markets/government/currency .

Because goods and services are worth as much as people decide they are, and people have decided running a multinational company is worth more than sweeping floors.

Because it makes it less likely that the poor will overthrow the current society and turn it into a shittier one

First of all, you're not part of the 1%. Second of all if you were the reason would be: redistribute the wealth or we will force you to. Trumps already got it going with his protectionism. Why do you think the neocon bankerfags are so pissed?

Because without rich people there will be no jobs and no economy for the poor people to generate money from and spend money in.

Oh also, the top 1% is all kikes, but we're not allowed to remove bagel.

die commie

Why do liberals defend giving money to niggers ?

Because it's a non issue.

>Rich people exist! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

Furthermore, the solutions offered for it tend to "equalise" it by making EVERYBODY poor.

nice meme m8. Why was our economy better off in the 70's then when inequality was significantly lower than today?

>tfw mother was born into poverty, shopped at goodwill for clothes, was on food stamps, had like 5 siblings, had to drop out of college because parents couldn't afford it and she ended up making her own business and now makes $200k a year

Feels fucking COMFY, my mom is the quintessential American dream and poor fuckers are poor because of a combination of a bad work ethic and not working smart

No they cannot. That is why we need a trusted, hardy tested democrat at the helm. Look into Hillary's record anons, she is our woman!

Nice meme m8. What has income inequality got to do with the general economy?

God I just love it when some plain old richfag thinks that they are actually part of the 1%. So delusional.

No trade deal with China.
No NAFTA.
No TPP.
Spics kept their filthy asses in Mexico.

that map might as well be an accurate population density representation

Another reason: I view people who haven't ever held manual labour jobs as subhuman queers. This includes most of the 1% ergo they have no rights in my mind and I'm free to steal their wealth.

Because in an ideal capitalist society, people would strive for more than stocking shelves at Target or flipping burgers at Chili's. But we have such a dumbed down population who has no drive, expecting equal income to people who actually work hard.

My mom was the same except now she's jobless and lives in my grandma's shed.

>in bottom 50%
>have house, health insurance, an iPhone 6, two cars, plenty of disposable income


Even the "poor" in America live like kings. You have to be financially retarded not to succeed in this country

you gave them that money.

you reap what you sow.

It would suck to be poor in the USA. Usa just has excellent social mobility and opportunity to move up to middle class, but you're fucked if you're poor

americans love being fucked from behind by corporations

Conservatives suck the 1 percent's dicks because statistically if I tell you four things that are right you're more likely to support my fifth idea.

So first the 1% strokes Joe Redneck's cock about Jesus and Guns and Gay Marriage and Abortion. Then the 1% tells Joe that the rich pay too much taxes, and if Joe doesn't help stop this then liberals will take away his Jesus and his Guns.

Most of that "wealth" is in properties and other assets that would quickly devalue if every one of them was forced to sell them for redistribution (who would have the capital to buy them btw?).

So the numbers that made up that graph are grossly inflated for all practical purposes.

Yes because the only reason people take low wage job is because they are lazy subhuman leeches.
Please kill yourself and your family.

Because they're evil. What? Did the jewish religion not give it away?

There is literally nothing wrong with income inequality. The poorest quartile of people in countries with lots of economic freedom are still wealthier than people in the poorest quartile of people in countries without economic freedom.

The most insidious lie of socialism is that you can enact these vast government redistribution of wealth programs while maintaining the same amount of total wealth in your economy. Not sure. Government spending and influence kills your economy and the human spirit as well.

youtube.com/watch?v=FNtyV0CXfzU

Watch at 2:28

Income =/= Wealth.

Most wealth is intangible assets that are not liquid or fungible - i.e. they own stocks and shares, or companies or property, whose valuations are largely irrelevant and do not translate into liquid financial assets, aka, cash. Even those companies and shares do not translate into anywhere near as much - company incomes are not personal incomes, and share dividends are actually rare.

It's like having $1000 bucks or a single very shiny very valuable rock worth thousands of times more. You can do a lot with $1000, but you have to translate that shiny rock into cash first, and you are first off not going to find anyone who has enough to give you an equitable trade, but second, not going to find anyone who won't force you to take much much much less.

The thing about Americas system is that it benefits all mankind. wealth inequality is growing in the usa because now that we have globalism the rich can invest around the world and other people are willing to work harder and for less than americans, so people invest elsewhere. As the wealth gap between the USA and the rest of the world narrows, the rich will start investing domestically more because there's less benefits to investing offshore. A billion people have escaped poverty in the last 30 years. There's less starvation and malnutritioned than ever. Africa is finally industrialising thanks to foreign investment. Globalism and capitalism have been a net positive for people in general.

> Stefan "bootlicker " molyenshit

dropped

People are greedy shits and nothing will ever change. This is how the world has been for millennia.
I will never be rich even with my degree in CS, I will be a worker bee who's life is to provide for my captialist overlords, and to be happy with the measly scraps they give me.
And there's nothing I can do.

Communist bullshit diluted to make it not seem like communist bullshit

What's the other reason, you shit kebab?

People are not equal, why should their incomes be?

to get free micky dees you retárd

Turn off th Fox News dumbass

not an argument

American propaganda at work people

...

Income Inequality means nothing when the poorest among your people are still capable of driving around Bugattis. Rather than trying to reduce the high to barely lift the poor, why not try to help the poor rise to the high?

You can revolt. But then you wouldn't be able to shitpost in comfy threads for the rest of your life.

I hate this argument so fucking much.

1. The poor aren't poor because the rich are rich.

2. Taking things from people who earned more than you based solely on the fact that they earned more is asinine. Some people earn more than others. This is a fact.

Why the fuck do poor people feel entitled to the fruits of someone else labor?! Jesus Christ. This isn't how anything works anywhere! I baked 5 cookies, but he baked 100! He owes me cookies! I bought a small plot of land and be bought verdant pastures! He owes me land! My child got a D on the test but his child got an A! Distribute the points!

Do better at life! Stop being a fucking Gibsme!

>not a single blonde person
>graphic made by some shithaired spic

Because you have no claim to it.

Make a thousand black people hammer a car for five years. Try to sell that car for however much you think that labour was worth to other people.

Or if you want it to be a productive endeavour, make the same black people all build a single car in five years. Again, try to sell the car for however you think the labour is worth to other people.

Because at the end of the day all that matters is that niggers stay oppressed. Somehow income inequality one day pass wealth from the elite of the white race downwards to the common aryan.

Starving people in africa earn far less than you, you need to stick with your morals and give them more of your stuff.

Wealth redistribution from the bottom to the top so yes, in this case the rich is richer because the middle class and the poor became even poorer. When income inequality becomes too big then it's also bad for the economy. You need consumers in a consumer-based economy. The fact that you believe that the wealthy did nuffin wrong and they all deserve what they have is proof enough of your blindness to reality. You have no fucking idea what's happening to your damn country.

The rich steal from the poor

Hell, that's capitalism in a fucking nutshell.

I think reduced inheritance would give everyone a fair chance. stop the fucks who just have to inherit money. make people work for it

>implying NAFTA and TPP will not increase economic inequality

not an argument :)

In communism, man exploits fellow man.
In capitalism, it's the other way around.

what about the middle class and lower middle class
why arent more people middle and upper middle class?
here is why
the PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM a product of SOCIALISM
why would someone get their child in a private school when its so much easier and cheaper to take them to PUBLIC SCHOOLS
i guarantee 50%+ of public school students will end up in the lower middle class or worse
probably a lot more though
public schooling is the problem
it needs to be abolished
nice shitpost though

> This isn't how anything works anywhere! I baked 5 cookies, but he baked 100! He owes me cookies! I bought a small plot of land and be bought verdant pastures! He owes me land! My child got a D on the test but his child got an A! Distribute the points!

>implying thats how it works
More like I worked all day doing something productive for 50k$ a year and getting taxed for like 50% of it while some rich banker crashes the economy multiple times a century and gets my tax money in bailouts.

The poor have never been able to touch the top 1%. At best a revolution will get the seconded richest people dragged into the streets, but richest ones are always out of reach.

The current economic situation is thanks to a slew of reasons, like globalization and neo-liberal economical policies enacted during the 70s and 80s, under the false pretense of making americans even more prosperous. The average american wage has actual fallen since the 80s, even though we're working more hours that before. This is some post-apocalyptic type shit we're heading towards.
This is western civilization collapsing under the greed of few and the complacency of many.

the reason there are more poor people than just not rich people is socialism
we need pure capitalism
socialist programs like public schools doom americas youth to failure at a terrifying rate

Daily reminder:
Equality of opportunity =/= equality of outcome.

The poor are poor because of decisions made by the rich. Who decided to outsource? Who decided to develop automation technology? We all live in a social contract. If society needs 20 of your 100 cookies to remain stable, then you'd better hand over those cookies buddy or you can get the fuck out. It's the way the world works.

socialism has killed equality of opportunity

What is all this Rayndian shitposting? Trump killed your faggot "traditional conservatism" Get with the times or get run over.

Chill out there mccarthy

This

Perhaps not, but it'll cause them to flee from their homes, from their possessions, and from their lives.

>Someone performs a hard job like heart surgury
>Should get paid the same as a photographer

This is what lefties actually believe

commies on this board reeeeeeee

The second richest are the people that actually worked for it you fucking monster.

Straya with intelligence discourse as always

I think all pay should be based on hard work ideally. There's no moral reason a marketing VP who does absolute shit should make more than a steelworker. Obviously it's difficult to get this put into practice from an economic standpoint.

People at the bottom make enough money to live a great life.
They're mad at the 1% because of jealously and nothing else. The 1% being rich doesn't take money away from the poor. It doesn't effect the poor.
They're just mad because they see some sort of an injustice, as if the the top 1% are living happy lives while other people are suffering. It's complete bullshit.
The reason the 1% make that much money isn't because ''oh shit, I need to make more money because I am greedy hurr I need more money!!!''. They do it because they need a lot of money to run their business.
They're not sitting on their big stack of cash laughing at poor people. They're investing the money and making their business grow.

>niggers are niggers because of whites
Same logic, doesn't make sense this way either.

Use your brain.

>Actually worked for it
I go to a top 10 uni. Trust me, the majority of the upper middle class got that way through nepotism.

Because if you work for your money, you should keep it. I own a small thrift store and as a business owner, fuck off. (Also we give people with MAGA hats discpunts. We don't put upna sign though, you have to do it as your own free will.)

>there are people in this thread who think that wealth is finite

who is Randy Coffey and who does he work for? who hired him to make this because I have seen the "US divided by wealth" picture many times before, a special interest group is funding this propaganda

Niggers would't be dirt poor if we still had manufacturing jobs. How does this not make sense? Are you arguing that everyone is equally intelligent? There are always going to be people who are dumber than average, and who have a hard time competing in the capitalist system. It is morally wrong to leave them behind.

Oh yeah? Really?
How do you explain the $500K cars, $20M mansions and attitude towards people with less wealth with complete contempt?

Oh.. you're only talking about people who receive 3x more than they ACTUALLY NEED, not 30x more. Right?

Could it have anything to do with the drastic decrease in the proportion of whites in this country?

What about expensive cars and houses, retard? What about them?
You people are mentally ill. You think someone is magically going to be happy if they can afford an expensive mansion? You're a fucking idiot.

Answer the question faggot.

Protip: You won't

It's certainly not infinite

Reading through Marx/Engel's Communist Manifesto, they still require a class of people to regulate their communism.

This means that the foundation of communism includes in it's core beliefs the very thing in which it is theorized to eliminate and that it is so necessary to have that communism cannot exist without it.

Communists are hypocrites. Hypocrites are of the same evil as liars and axe murderers.

its not like that though
the rich 1% making say 1000 cookies enough are forced to pay 90% of their cookies to "help the poor" but they cant create jobs at these wages, so, they cheat, and they dont pay their cookies, and they hoard their cookies in fear of losing all their cookies to the government
the government makes many programs with these cookies they dont even have and debt builds up destroying the economy
so the middle and upper middle class ends up paying the most cookies
even though they may be earning 100-150 cookies
they are forced to pay 50-75 cookies to pay for things they dont want to pay for like, other people who dont work for their cookies and dont pay cookies to the government and just sit on a comfy stack of about 75 cookies never having to work, the government sees so many people arent working, while that is because the government essentially says "you dont have to" but they think its because people are unfortunate and dont make enough money, so they take a little bit more of everyone elses cookies or in other words, just the middle and upper middle classes cookies, they make public schools where everyone of every cookie class can go learn to earn cookies
but the public schools teach to the test and even cheat to get more cookies from the government
the lowly paid teachers dont care about their job, and every student is taught the same thing the same way, millions of kids grow up braindead and the upper middle class fades away into the middle class and eventually into the lower class
at this point there is a low and high class
and the class divide tears the country apart
socialism is pretty much the cookie monster

>87 replies
>op still has one post

Sage this shill thread

There's nothing to explain. People buy stupid shit that they can afford.
You're complaining about people trying to get rid of their excess wealth by buying expensive crap they don't need.

Wealth is a much more dividing line than anything else, even more so that nationality and religion and especially more so than race.

i explained it please close this thread now mods

It's the fucking dream of being number one and stepping on your peers faces. Without that, nothing can progress.

7/10 too many straws

You're missing the point. What I'm saying is that the increase in spics and niggers in our country has resulted in more poverty and thus, more wealth inequality. If those spics and niggers did not exist, much of our income inequality would also disappear.

If you make over 30k USD a year congratulations you are in the top 1% of income.

Welcome to the capitalist class my friend.

le abbon strawmang argument