Is it wrong to buy sexual favors from escorts?

Is it wrong to buy sexual favors from escorts?

Maybe extreme poltards who think it's barely immoral to literally rape women need not answer. I'm interested to hear what the more level-headed among you have to say.

Define wrong.

if you are paying and she is agreeing it's fine

It's impossible to define the concept of being wrong in terms that are not normative. Something is wrong if it belongs among the things which ought not to be done, which are not fitting, which are not morally permissible, and so on. If you're not competent with the concept of wrongness, you also need not answer. But you probably are.

It is wrong to risk going to jail to fuck an escort.

as long as it is safe there are few transactions more historically common than paying for sex, marriage is basically an escort service contract gone wrong

don't know about wrong

but pretty pathetic tbh

>interested to hear what the more level-headed think
>level-headed
>Sup Forums

weeeew lad you're a funny one

If it is legal where you live and they have protections to avoid the bad sides of prostitution, then sure it would be fine from a legal standpoint.
From a moral standpoint, it depends on how you feel about it.
I would personally never exchange money for sex, but that is my personal position and I wouldn't fault others for doing it if everyone involved are adults and consenting.

If you can afford it and it makes u happy then go for it. Its actually cheaper than having a relationship. Ive never bought one because i just settle for almost anything. If you have trouble getting laid, just lower your standards a bit.

Not op but, i work 80 hours a week. Hookers are a convenient way to feel like a person for a while.

You've got a point.

Between consenting adults it's fine. Just make sure you wrap it up.

I refuse to believe that an ass that perfect exists in real life.

Jesus fuck, life's not fair.

I see nothing wrong with it
bought sexual favors a few times in my life.
Easily most of the time the service also was good.
Just make sure who you pick, who can offer good service and does it out of own will.

it depends on whether or not your the type of person that can distinguish between business and feelings if you're someone who gets attached to girls that are being nice to you easily then it might not be a good idea

So you come to a porn website asking if it's ok to pay a sex worker for sex acts. Not really an unbiased audience.

>level headed response
Kek. My first time was with a pro. I've had about a dozen since then. So long as it's between consenting adults then I don't think it's wrong.

Truth in many voices.

This is not the only place I've asked the question.

This isn't solely a porn site dude.
Have you seen all of the no fap fags who rail on and on about being a puritan prude is somehow healthy?

>level-headed among you
lol...you do know where you're asking?

Anyway, no. It's two consenting adults agreeing to give eachother favours, one in the form of money and the other in the form of sexual acts.

Apparently Americans think it's hard to regulate, even though it happens in other countries.

Never done it myself, but I wouldn't be against it. If you do, then be safe. It's not as dangerous as buying some heroin off a guy in an alleyway, but it's definitely more risky than picking up a dime bag from a friend.

Religiously and legally, yes. Otherwise, it's perfectly moral.

>is it wrong to buy sex from a woman who's profession revolves around having sex with men for money

Do you even think before you speak? They made the decision to live like this and you are merely a client.

It's what our society has come too. Women have so much power nowadays that it's impossbile to get laid. THey use their pussy to manipulate us you have to have a good job, be attractive, be funny, have a good social status and even then you have to work your ass off to get laid. Then they wonder why we'd rather just pay 100$ for a quick fuck...

>normative

SJW detected

checked in the name of truth

>paying for sex
meh whatever dude

>paying for sex as a virgin
BAHAHAHAH FAGGOT LOSER

The term 'normative' predates the contemporary SJW-movement. It's used in academia to talk about reasons- and value-talk for a century. But yeah, whatever. I'm the boogeyman. Oooooooo!

if all you want from sex is sticking your dick in somebody then sure, you can do that.

I'm sorry for speaking without checking my privilege, xir.

Those freaks go on other porn sites too. When 90% of the threads are porn then it's a porn site.

I forgive you.

You're basing your view of the site only on Sup Forums though.
There are plenty of porn free boards on Sup Forums.

Ppl have been bangin whores forever.. even jesus did.
Its only taboo because prudes on their moral high horses like to hate.

And no one goes there.

Well if she consents it's fine I guess.

They wouldn't be there if no one used them.

>consents

SJW GTFO

Consent isn't only a sjw thing user.
We made consent laws way before sjws were even a thing.

It's very obvious that op was talking about a consentual situation but you had to cram your agenda in there.

You're reading way to much into things, I'm not even the user you were originally replying to.

A prostitute consents to have sex with you for money. That's what they do. Therefore consent was already implied in the op. Now tell me what was added to the discussion by bringing it up?

Checked. Let's start out with the fact that most "escort" services are in actuallity prostitution. The people who provide the service advertise it as escort to disguise there true intention. But I'm sure if you want to pay a shit ton of money just to walk around with someone you could still do it. Personally, I don't believe these business transactions hurt two consenting adults. Things as a buyer you should be aware of and be able to point out as the buyer are, potential for life changing std, potential to be robbed, and potential of dealing with a sex slave and not a prostitute. These potential hazards are all problems caused by making prostitution illegal in certain countries.

The notion that op should make sure the person they are buying services from are voluntarily in that field of work. Human trafficking is a thing user.

They're there for the one autist who made them

What are you doing here then, don't you have a board to manage?

Good point. I assumed we were talking about first world countries not Nicaragua.

Sex trafficking is also a big problem first world countries, heck the amount of wealth in first world countries is part of why so many people get trafficked there.

I've lived in a first world country my entire life and I've never been trafficked even once.

I say, because of prostitution, there should be zero virgins. If you cant/ don't want to get pussy the old fashioned way. Go for it. If I were unable to get laid for any reason, I would be buying escorts for sure

...

Thats not how trafficking works user, trafficking abuses people from poor countries trying to get out of a shitty situation, by promising them a better life in a first world country.

Actually I wouldn't mind getting a hug, platonic affection like that is almost always nice.

...

In the case that you described they would have consented quid pro quo

Have been with a few escorts when single, has always been very pleasant.

Amerifat here. I've done it. Need to be legalized and regulated. It would probably help save a lot of marriages and reduce human trafficking here.

Not if they get promised one thing and suddenly find out that they have to work off an ever increasing debt to the people who traffic them through sex work.