Hey Sup Forums Ask a guy that is conservative anything

Hey Sup Forums Ask a guy that is conservative anything

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-UNDuAPMAuw&t=2m46s
washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

What do you think of trump letting the Saudis purchase 40 billion of our infrastructure increasing the housing prices? Or the 110 billions in weapons after they were confirmed to support most of the terrorists groups?

How do you justify your positions in light of the fact that thruout history, change is the only constant? Conservatives are, by definition, fighting a losing war.

How long until you reply to yourself acting like a liberal and an asshole so you can point and it and yell "see what i mean?"

Look, the best we can hope for is to delay the inevitable decent into communism. Because after that it's only a matter of time until a revolution.

The word "change" doesn't specify a direction. Why don't you change and stop being a commie faggot. Faggot

Who do you believe when it comes to global warming? The scientific community with their agenda that consists of nothing other than following the scientific method, or all the oil companies and the politicians they buy who all stand to get fucked if global warming really is man made?

Such a speculation

How do you justify the republicans killing 1 000 000 black slaves in 1992?

When will you answer any of us?

fuck you

It's happened to ever single past government. What?

I think any engagement with Saudis in the short or long term is not good for the country. They are a terrorist nation.

The New Testament was a change on the Old Testament. Change with conservatives may be slow but it happens.

Fuck Communism. It is cancer just like socialism.

I studied climatology. Global warming is false.

Cooling and heating trends is what happens and what has happened in the last 65 million years.

In about 100 years from now, there might be some floodings here and there but nothing cataclysmic.

How does this affect me?

Where was this meme taken from? Does anyone have a link to the actual video?

I have standards no thanks lib fag

Why do you define your self in one word instead of a multifaceted person with views that can range on a spectrum?

When you say study what do you mean? Got a degree in? Took a class in? Read a journal article on? Read a blog on?

Or 8. There are what? 3 communist countries today? It's not going to happen

I think op is questioning his life choices and has left

It's official. Op is a fag who was just trying to troll and when he didn't make people angry and people asked him rational questions he left to go fag out

I'm not a Liberal.

Define yourself

Conservative. Not a communist/socialist, believes in health care with being able to choose what you want covered, believe that transgenderism is gender dysphoria due to 40 per cent suicide rate, believe that the gay agenda is transparent, believe that feminists are cancer, believe that the neural network of academia will solve most world problems including disease, I believe that the Constitution is sacrosanct.

Cool i don't like gays too

So sacrosanct that it needed 27 amendments to get it right?

Not OP that's a really shitty argument.

Why don't you just stay on Sup Forums

Sean Hannity told him something about it.

You are obviously stupid and live in your basement.

Every amendment addresses a different issue.

One is freedom of speech and your right to say mentally retarded shit.

Assuming you're an American; how does it feel to vote for the most dangerous organization in human history?

youtube.com/watch?v=-UNDuAPMAuw&t=2m46s

Skip to 2 minutes 46 seconds.

So why do you hate net neutrality?

>RE: abortion
Why do you hate individual liberty?

>RE: voter suppression
Why do you hate democracy?

>RE: party over country
Why do you hate America?

Not OP but,
>Chomsky
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Well, I studied it in university and got frowned upon for my findings that contradicted narrative.

There is fudged data that shows 1998 was the hottest year, but in fact it was data from 1934. It was published by NASA and other global warming advocates.

Moreover, the data demonstrates cooling and heating trends.

To suggest otherwise goes against empirical data.

Now, global warming is a politically charged narrative that ties into economic ramifications which aims to promote a socialist economy.

Moreover, the countries trying to combat carbon emissions are idiotic.

Most carbon emissions is produced by growing food.

Should all of humanity starve to death?

Even if countries were to implement bans on CFC's countries would come out with HFC's.

Climate change that somehow we will all melt is stupid.

We can heat up the ionosphere with concentrated electromagnetic energy. Moreover, Tesla said you can control the weather with EME.

So all in all, it is just a drive to fund green parties and promulgate socialism. The people behind it do not address important issues like pollution.

..go vegan, moron..

Convincing argument you've got there. Imbecile.

You mean Republicans who abolished slavery?

Yeah fuck off dude.

...

Probably because it isn't an argument, more like dismissal. Food for thought.

>Why do you hate individual liberty?

Not OP, but why do you hate the youngest humans?

I don't hate net neutrality.

Infanticide isn't freedom of choice. It is murder.

Our president was democratically elected, to say otherwise makes you a fascist.

I love America. That's why Hillary isn't in office.

Are you from Sup Forums?

>Food for thought.
Not really. Outright dismissing the most influential public intellectual alive is more of a instant disqualifier for any further attention.

No. Veganism is for pussy hipsters.

Kek

I have spoken to Chomsky on one occasion and know someone who knows him personally.

He is a die hard Leftist.

And?

No.

The point is he can use his academia and fame to perpetuate his bias on issues relative to politics.

...well

Looks like someone isn't thinking, it means I'm not here to argue, so there's nothing to disqualify.

So fuck off then.

You are black. You don't

Try to make sense the next time your write a response.

...u wish, but don't know..

Why? Do I infuriate you? It's not my fault you posted a video to a contentious figure highly likely to undergo attacks like mine. In a better or worse fashion, someone was going to do that anyway, this time it was me.

Your logic: the Russians defeated Hitler many years ago, therefore the Russians can't be dangerous.

Try again.

>Russians defeated Hitler
Kek, maybe on the Russian front, but the war was a group effort.

...

washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/

I don't have a question but thank you, fuck SJWs and Feminists they can burn in ovens for all I care

the fuck are you on about? the new testament was written after christianity had already prospered

Yeah, fuck civil liberties, equality and justice! Fuck it all to hell!

Not a question, but you stupid fuckers aren't allowed to call out libs for being easily teiggered.

Last week I went on a fake facebook page for the pres, where they posted a fake article about how McDonalds was apprantly going to stop offering Bacon in France to appease the Muslim community and tons of you losers lost. your. damn. minds. Lol! Those crazy fucks were calling for boycotts of McDonalds and even MURDER before they 1) checked the source or 2) asked themselves why they even gave a damn.

You're a bunch of stupid fucking hypocrites and you too fucking arrogant to even consider it for a second. Ignorance may be bliss for you, but the educated left suffers every day just to share your oxegen.

forget it man, maga chud, no brain

Not OP but,
>imply left automatically means educated

And I don't give a shit about the gammatical errors, I'm writing with thumbs and editing just wasn't worth my time.

Well, generally speaking, staticistics say that Liberals have higher formal education.

At least in America, in terms of how they vote.

>teiggered

Doesn't change the group effort aspect, Russians only get to claim they suffered the highest losses and made a big contribution, but the work of other allies in conjunction with the Socialists of Russia is what really ousted Hitler.
>btw other Amerifags of the certain variety that claims victory reading this also need to stop saying "wi wun"

Correlation=/=causation
Hitting the books is up to you regardless of political association.

>lost the vote
>"elected"

Came here to find the sauce as I looked before and wound up seeing a bunch of other similar shit, just not that one scene.

Read the article next time. If it hadn't been for the Soviet Union, the allied invasion of Europe would've definitely failed. The Soviet advance into Berlin after having demolished the Nazi war machine on the eastern front did not require western assistance.

Face it: USSR defeated Nazi Germany. US stole all the credit.

Well, interesting coincidence then, isn't it?

What is the electoral college?

You literally need to go back to school lmaooooooooooooooooooooooooo

The education of which you speak generally comes in the form of molly-coddling by the State and their parents (and grandparents, and trust funds, etc.) which also implies a complete separation from what we here on the right call "reality". The reason people at Yale can talk oppression with a straight face is because they know literally fuck-all about places NOT like Yale. Their education is as useless as it is extensive. Their relevance lies not in their production of any useful thing, but their daddy's money and their mother's social clubs.

The irony?

When Mao ascended, the rich were castigated and murdered in the streets by adolescent socialists. If Rome is to burn, the suburbanite cloisters of these useful idiots' families will be where it burns the hottest.

Ah, Chomsky.

Master of accurately telling half the story and drawing the wrong conclusion.

>Master of accurately telling half the story and drawing the wrong conclusion.

By all means; elaborate.

Are you calling people from Yale useless when you're literally a basement dweller chilling on Sup Forums? This website kills me hahahaha

As a Conservative, patriotic American, I have no trouble believing this. Honestly, since the fall of Soviet doctrine, I don't understand why we've been so at odds with Russia. If China and Hong Kong can co-exist locally, why can US and Russia not co-exist globally, for mutual benefit?

How big is your dick?

You want to compare early 20th cent China to America in the present? That's adorable. Spoken like a true Nazi who knows kuckall about places not like Kentucky.

I guess that Non-Aggression Pact and invading Poland with Germany did not work out too well for Uncle Joe and the commies, eh comrade?

thanks for sharing user

Because the US demands unchallenged supremacy and global hegemony. Russia stands in the way for regional dominance in the Middle East (Iran, Syria). Also, the possible military alliance between Russia and China is also a hindrance for further dominance in the East Asian region.

It's all power politics. Realpolitik, as Kissinger called it. Disgusting imperialism, really.

Its a system that allows all the US states and the District of Columbia (Washington DC) equal say regardless of population of a state. Some say it ought to be abolished in favor of a popular vote, but it would mean that a lot of states would be totally ignored as a lot of the grain belt states are sparsely populated in favor of states like California and NY, Florida, Texass. But this is where the tyranny part that the electoral college saves us from as those four states are like all freakin mexicants, so FOAD the electoral college is here to stay. And if the Demorats would have been elected, Hillary would have imported every shitskin muslim in the world and we'd be like Manchester.

At the end of WW2 it had worked out pretty well for the Soviets, despite their heavy losses.

Not really, there's plenty of discrepancies between every two subjects you stack up and mentioning this one at best means you pay attention to statistics. For instance, on the other hand, American conservatives of varying backgrounds were surveyed as typically happier than American liberals. Does that mean all of one is bitter, and the other jovial? Hardly, such information is happenstance indicative not of a trait inherent to one subject or the other, but rather a factor or circumstance that influences that characteristic. But people from both sides seem to be oblivious to this and hijack such information to justify preconcieved notions and form misconceptions.

>And if the Demorats would have been elected, Hillary would have imported every shitskin muslim in the world and we'd be like Manchester.

Your ignorance is astonishing.

Someone needs to tell him what statistal outliers are...

You're right, 99 percent of the world's scientists (who just happened to all be liberal for some reason) decided to create this conspiracy.

A conspiracy opposed only by politicians financed by the Koch brothers (don't they own oil rigs? That's a weird coincidence) and people who don't understand meteorology.

yeah, post-war USSR was a real workers paradise. They had it pretty good elsewhere behind the Iron Curtain too.

Let me quote myself:

"Generally speaking"

I left some room for exceptions to what I never labed as a rule.

It's still effectively worthless, because based off what I said, I feel inclined to ask: so what?