How do libertarians deal with the physically challenged individuals inevitably born in any society?
Shouldn't we have taxes and a welfare state for them?
If we accept that isn't it just the logical extension to consider being a dumb nigger a disability and give them welfare too?
...
they'd most likely have to rely on charities and family
Libertardations WILL defend this
>this is now a natsoc thread
>if the gov doesnt do it nobody will!
Fuck outta here statecuck
>Shouldn't we have taxes and a welfare state for them?
No, that's what private charity exists for. The USA led the world in giving to charity far before we ever even considered having any welfare.
They don't have an answer because they're autistic and follow a flawed ideology.
Libertarian < Far left < Liberal < Conservative < Somewhere in between conservative and liberal i.e. you don't ignore empirical evidence and follow out-dated rules and traditions for the sake of it.
>That thing going into a pool
Seems like a bad idea tbqh
Also,
Why should we have people that provide a net loss for society?
>Inb4 you call me a net loss
Uh-oh, looks like someone got bantered out of the other two libertarian threads
To be a fair, great civilizations are great, but so is natural beauty. Although that bottom pic looks dry and could use more trees
Family support, looking after your own. If your child / nephew needs support you give it, not the State.
The only thing a State is good for is standardising things like voltages, plugs, road travel, train lines etc.
>has mouth
>has 2 other holes
She can still work as a prostitute surely.
People WILL fuck her, and they will pay.
20 pounds of pussy and ass.jpg
would you bang though?
stick it inner butt
who cares? I have a classmate who is a yernie supporter and she's like "all of this around us is only possible because of government"
I honestly think that somehow; economic proclivities have been confused with government
I think it's through the "united states is best" propaganda, and because of that, people associate business with the government
Yeah I would bang it no question
I'd rather have a beautiful state that continues the eternal struggle of mankind towards conquest and advancement.
she's got a nice body
except for.. i mean.. except I don't know if she has the nicest legs
underrated post
The same way we do now? By charity and family.
The only thing the state does is mandate that buildings need to have access for the handicap.
Without the state the only thing that would really change is less businesses being handicap accessible. Something that hits small size places more than cities.
Now those who become disabled by job is a different story.
True
You need a good balance of both
Cut her legs and you have the perfect onahole
20
My ancestors used to throw physically disabled people off of a specific cliff.
Guess my heritage.
These.
So you would just march around every day for free? How would you get food? Would you make someone else feed you? Who's going to build and sponsor all those expensive ass constructions?
spartan?
The only way I'd buy that is if it were heated.
libertarians are clowns
british/ irish for sure
abortion
>You need a good balance of both
This is what basically base my life around.
>So you would just march around every day
Don't be rediculous
top kek
dat fucknugget! oh man...
Families and charity. Ideally, we would be able practice eugenics and have abortions and post-birth euthanasia for them. If someone wants to be an idiot and raise a slobbering, paralyzed idiot then that's their issue. When they can't care for them then at least their misery is their own and everyone can see their example and not repeat their mistakes.
...and that is my fetish
Abortion. If the parents choose not to abort then the person is their responsibility. If supervenient disability, then family support, insurance or charity. The disabled could also seek working according to it (intellectual work for the physically disabled, simple physical work to mentally)
Yep. Unfortunately our cities have become decaying and degenerating pieces of shit.
We still have the countryside. For now
That thing should not be allowed anywhere near a swimming pool
nah it's fine, survival of the fittest
All the children in this thread who say family and charity know nothing of the real world.
theres a million reasons why family isn't always there and charities don't get funded by people voluntarily.
How would you feel if you had to depend on charity to live instead of guaranteed rights by your government.
Just drop your pretense of care for others and admit that you simply does not give a shit about others and you are not interested in having a society
I thought she was going to fall in the pool.
I'm a little disappointed now.
Soylent Green
She's got a nice set on her
Where can I find a woman like this?
in my basement
You're pretty retarded, m8.
Do you think Rome, the British Empire, etc did not have societies because they didn't guarantee rights to the disabled? I'm pretty sure most feudal societies actually allowed rulers to change their heir if the first born was disabled.
No, because that's how we ended up with retarded kings
They should be put down unless privately supported.
I absolutely DO care about society. An aspect of caring about society is recognizing that sometimes the person needs to make a sacrifice for the greater good. The woman in your OP post really has nothing to offer society and will always be a net detriment. She will need to be cared for. At best, she can work in some little booth at an amusement park and answer questions for tourists and give them useful information. But how many people like that do we really need? And she'll be stuck in that capacity for her entire life. She will never move up, and some kid that could have worked that job won't get to and will have to do something else.
Same with old people. If we ever wrangle in the human population in to sustainable levels, there will be a two-child birth policy. When people get old and can no longer wipe their own ass, what should they do? Who should care for them? They will either need to be warehoused, 20 patients to one person, which will be hell, or we will develop a culture of self-sacrifice, where the old, once they can no longer care for themselves, decide it's time to go and have themselves cremated or euthanized or whatever.
I fully appreciate everything society has to offer. I just don't appreciate this culture we've developed where we subsidize the mere existence of our lowest members. I have no problem with helping people who are good or useful people in their times of need, but paying for trash to continue living and being trash? No way.
You chose to have them and as such chose to provide for them
is there more of this porn clip?
>German
Why am I not surprised?
>mfw you could pull that top off and she couldnt stop you
Her legs look like sweet potatoes
>charities don't get funded by people voluntarily
What? That's pretty much the definition of a charity.
>How would you feel if you had to depend on charity to live instead of guaranteed rights by your government.
Having the government take the earnings of others and distribute them to you is not a "right".
over 20 lbs. of pussy AND ass?!?!?!
B-but shes hot
>mfw this is my fetish
I would feel exactly as I do now because as a white male I will never get my moneys worth out of the monetary redistribution programs
>grow crops in the middle of the woods, sell the seeds on the internet
>I am forced to pay for single mothers 600 miles away from me and for niggers to do drugs
dog bless social welfare
If anyone is willing to do business in a area roads will inevitably be built to transport goods.
If these roads exist they will inevitably be used for transportation.
IF a road is used for transportation it will inevitably attract business that will want to build their own stores along that road to funnel traffic to them.
The owners of the roads will charge the businesses to connect to their roads paying for their upkeep.
If you live some place barren and remote that doesn't attract businesses not having roads is the price you pay for living away from civilization.
why do you like nugget porn?
Easy.
>Any more brain busters?
I can see her easily being kidnapped and becoming someones living onahole in that situation.
I...who are these girls
Wrap that shit up. Turn her into a mermaid.
You're an idiot, she could do a lot of skilled trade / labor at a desk.
She could be a accountant a secretary,ect.
The real trick is here is when the person is so disabled that they can't even learn anything new and are only a suck on the state
my daughters
you 'mirin?
she looks pretty happy desu
I wonder who puts her bra on....
In my Slavic post-communist Christian mentality they are human beings and someone should take care of them. I have visited once a place where children resembling vegetables are taken care of by the nuns. Some of the children never even open their eyes.
Yeah, I know it is easy to shout "kill'em all" but if we start killing disabled we may end one day killing those not able to solve a linear differential equation.
btw can you do it, Sup Forums?
Shut uuuuup, stupid faggot. Anything she does will be of a lower quality and slower speed than an abled person. She can't even wipe her own shithole. She can't build a house with her bare hands if needed. We certainly shouldn't allow her to breed.
She is a net detriment. A strong society can handle one of her. But you tolerate even one and then you open up the idea of allowing more of them. Then you end up with what we have now. Millions of useless dregs.
>added to my "Aryan Women in Wheat Fields" folder, thanks m8
this, or leave it in front of a monastery
>I have visited once a place where children resembling vegetables are taken care of by the nuns. Some of the children never even open their eyes.
That's because they got beaten if they did user
>"Aryan Women in Wheat Fields" folder
Things I didn't know I needed
yeah, I expect is not all roses when the visitors leave
but at least they try
we should eat them
fill the bath tub with hot water and fuck it. that's what I do.I assume this is how the real deal feels.
>Could you do it?
Of course. Not even being edgy, but I would choose a cold, logical "trimming down" of society over a complete collapse. I would choose extermination programs in the short-term followed by euthanasia in the long-term over what we have now, which we can all see is heading straight for disaster. Overpopulation is going to destroy the biosphere. Niggers, poo-in-loos and chinks are going to overrun the planet. There will be a lower order of civilization when that happens, and we have only ourselves to blame because we became soft, like women, and allowed our compassion to overrule our better judgment. And do you think we will be any less miserable then? Would you not choose a quick, violent death over a slow demise with a painful brain tumor?
Whether or not a person wants to raise a child born with disabilities who will spend its entire life being completely dependent on handouts, is up to that individual. Society should be under no obligation to invest tax dollaras on a potato.
>makes a living on the internet.
>doesn't think taxes are worth it
wew ladddd
>Implying you wouldn't
in Europe we had regularly wars....
i'd pick that thing up and rail it
Those stumps are pretty unaesthetic desu.
Why doesn't she remove them? They don't even seem to help much with movement, they're just hanging in the air
>we may end one day killing those not able to solve a linear differential equation.
i have a disability that makes me retarded at math.
literally
on the other hand im absurdly gifted with music and mechanical thinking.
i still offer more than a child that cant even open its eyes.
and since i ride a motorcycle ive told my family if i ever become a vegetable to yank the plug and let me die.
they probably should be killed 2bh. in a simpler time theyd have been thrown in a lake. but no i couldnt be the one to do it
It really wouldn't help much to remove them, so she decided to keep what little she had. Besides, her boyfriend might just have a fetish for that king of stuff.
>instead of guaranteed rights by your government.
They're actually privileges not rights.
A good example is Social Security.
The US government could tomorrow vote to end social security and not pay out another cent. Everyone who has paid into it to date will not get another penny out.
The above scenario is completely legal.
Rights do not stem from government. Every person has three rights:
Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The government can help protect these rights or they can try to deny a person them, however these rights remain with the person despite the government's best efforts.
parents problem.
In simpler times they would probably die out of hunger, disease or some invader.
I do not think really disabled people can breed and have healthy offspring. At least not here.
If I ever lost my legs' mobility permanently, I'd cut them and train to become the two-limbed monkey. No point in keeping those.
This post gained you enough experience to rank up to full blown edge-lord.
Poor girl.
>An aspect of caring about society is recognizing that sometimes the person needs to make a sacrifice for the greater good.
a platitude. is not an argument
>fridge door fallacy
lol
She can't even wipe away her own tears.
I will never feel sorry for myself again.
I want to give her cybernetic prosthetics.
Because cyborgs are my fetish.
Basement material.
You mean like babies?
I'd fuck her desu
And yet she smiles. Let this be a reminder of the indomitable flame that burns deep within each of us, user.
they sell warming rods