Thoughts on Paul Joseph Watson?

Thoughts on Paul Joseph Watson?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=2JXrDwtiqQs
youtube.com/watch?v=EfRyXnKbpaQ
youtube.com/watch?v=cbHSiQyCPTw
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Based. Even criticized Jews

youtube.com/watch?v=2JXrDwtiqQs

qt

I just wonder why we have constant threads about him asking variations on the same question.

Seems to bring up the most layman arguaments so obvious, that BTFO liberals

Example that if you're good looking and confident you can overcome autism.

>fock the pope
No fuck him. I like how he btfos Israel though

Also this. nohomo

controlled ojewposition

Meh. Harmless but not based.

He doesn't say any revealing stuff or BTFO anyone. He just says angry stuff, usually after 10 other people did a documented video about it.

>Seems to bring up the most layman arguaments so obvious, that BTFO liberals

He once gathered evidence how Israel creates Islamist groups to false flag.
Extremely autistic on pop culture though

He is hot

I enjoy his videos. Dunno why he's with infowars, but he is a good conduit for normies to start getting into the red pill.

His evidence-gathering is one of his best aspects. Regardless of what you think of any individual citation, when the story is like 50% citations, it makes it a lot more reasonable to decide how much to agree with his analysis of the data presented.

I like him. He should move to America

That sounds interesting. I started watching his videos after one good piece of documentation someone posted here on Sup Forums

Then realized that he releases a lot of quota-filling videos just being angry about something and stopped following him.

Nothing against the guy, don't get me wrong. I just think he lacks too much content so no wonder his good stuff gets buried in his own channel.

If you can link me to the video you mention I'd appreciate it. If not I'll find it eventually.

youtube.com/watch?v=EfRyXnKbpaQ
He also made another about war crimes by Israel

Why should I take anything seriously that is said by someone that looks like that

>Watsonberg

youtube.com/watch?v=cbHSiQyCPTw

>dem eyes

he should sleep more

I hope you're not implying that he wasn't being sarcastic when he said "Israel is only defending itself". I know Germans are renowned for not being able to detect sarcasm.

Thank you. Checking it out now.

Autist & not funny

Enough about you. What do you think of Paul Joseph Watson?

>DONOLD TROMP

You're objectively the dumbest person on this board. Read the tweet I replied to you retard

Never cease to make me laugh, 'Straya

Hes a reptilian

Next-gen Roger Stone

How did you learn to speak English so well, Mehmet?

I don't trust any of these "right wing" YouTube stars. Him, McInnes, Molyneux, Crowder, Milo, Hyde, I can't think of any more of the top of my head, but all those guys in that vein feel like fakers putting on acts to make money. I don't think they believe a word they say. Especially when you've got cases like Milo who's a self proclaimed gay Jew or Gavin who founded Vice and then later "found God". I think all he really found was an easy way to make money

Literally an unkempt version of Thoughty2

Seems like a good goy. Started with basic bitch sargon-of-akkad-style stuff against low-hanging fruit like SJWs and feminism. But he's started doing more red pilled things like lampooning cultural relativism and I believe he even used the phrase "cultural marxism" once or twice.

So you're implying the opposite of their views (the left) is right and one should believe in the leftist narrative?

Ugly af if you actually have standards, speaks like he has had several strokes, seems like he's reading straight from a Wikipedia page

Honestly I find him pretty embarrassing

>So you're implying the opposite of their views (the left) is right and one should believe in the leftist narrative?
How the fuck did you get THAT out of what I said?
>I think these guys are phony
>"oh, so means you think left wing opinions are correct?"
Oh fuck I should've checked your flag first,

Crowder has a weak voice and is impossible to listen to
Milo is clearly milking the movement
Molyneux is legit
Paul Watson has half a redpill

Others are irrellevent

You said they are putting on an act to make money and they don't believe a word they say. That means you find their views so offensive and extreme that you must've had your soft brain drilled with leftist propaganda for many years.

Leftist faggots such as yourself always have problems with views other than their own or those which go against your leftist narrative.

Where does he hail from anyway? He's got this strange accent and enunciation.

Aside from that, he's pretty good in delivering his argument.

He is hot and you know it

I like him, he's pretty hot too. Pure Aryan male 10/10.

based

>Oh fuck I should've checked your flag first
Character attack

Also known as #NotAnArgument. Cut him some slack though, look at his flag; he's obviously just another brain dead American Goy.

Pretty correct on most things, although his red lips, sparkly eyes and Northerner accent pisses me off, tbqh senpai.
>tfw I am also a Northerner

Cucklet Shapiro is the one ur forgetting.

You are right not to trust them, their income is directly proportional to how much attention they get and how controversial their speech is.

It's a money grab because there is a huge problem with the past 15 years. People are turning off television networks and turning on their phones, facebook, netflix. There is a demand for instant information. New media, constant news, constant entertainment, but currently its largely garbage, gossip, and conspiracies.

These alt-right weenies are basically conspiracy theories for plebs, they all skirt around some conspiracy classics without ever outright naming them, there is always a big scary monster- jews, communists, jihadi's, NWO, etc.

You'll find if you've been jerking off since your early teens like most of us, you would have started with nude models doing softcore, then lesbian porn, then hardcore, then asian chicks, black chicks, fat chicks, old chicks, different fetishes, hentai, shemales etc.

Shemales were NOT a thing 10 years ago, maybe not even 5 years ago. But traps suddenly became viral through Sup Forums and then some clever businessmen flooded the internet with Brazilian shemale porn exploding the genre.

So porn became more and more extreme and radical as the internet needed to find crazier porn to satisfy the demand for novelty.

The same thing is happening with all information, these technodweeb futurists obsessed with muhsingularity fantasies are a good example, conspiracy theory elevated to theology and not a single physics or maths degree to rub between them.

Atheists had a period like 2004-2011 something like that, where it was heavily pushed online and they had little micro celebrities debating and spouting hundred year old arguments for and against religion.


It's always a way to make money off of stupid people. Your attention is worth money.

>You said they are putting on an act to make money and they don't believe a word they say.
Yes, that's what I said.
>That means you find their views so offensive and extreme that bla bla bla
Can someone else please step in and tell this wallabynigger he's an idiot?
Protip mate: Google "satire". They're like a more convincing Stephen Colbert

reptilian

Now I know you're just trolling and fishing for replies. Nobody can actually be stupid enough to think Stefan Molyneux and JPW are satirists. This is your last reply you shall receive from me, troll.

I really HATE how he INFLECTS

IMO it's hilarious how Trump has ousted which media figures are controlled opposition and which are serious.

Not so long ago, Shapiro was seen as "one of the good jews" who was willing to lampoon liberalism and destroy SJWs. And then Trump shows up and they start acting like fucking manchildren, and you know where their allegiances lie.

Milo is still a problem though. While he embraces trump and the alt-right, he's only doing so because he's a jewy attention whore and quite possibly is trying to co-opt the movement.

He's legit, kinda want to know about his background though. He's kept it surpressed well in this day and age.

PJW is my favourite reptilian.

No. Fuck off. We send you John Oliver and Piers Morgan.
You ungrateful burger. The cream of British journalism. Nobody in UK has heard of John 'current year' Oliver.

But Paul Joseph Watson should cut his ties with Alex Jones, then he'd have a lot more credibility.
Alex is a bit too much: GLOBALISTS, BANKSTERS, BUY MY WATER FILTERS.
And when he gets a knowledgeable guest on, he shouts over the top of them. It's fucking annoying.

That's true as well. I'd be easier to show people PJW videos if not for the fact that he's tied to Alex Jones, which immediately discredits him to the normies.

He's a good lad.

I'd fuck him and claim him as my redpilled bf desu.

Well I liked the "better than others" video, and then I saw his reptilian eyes being exposed.

So now, I'm pretty sure infowars is controlled opposition.

We don't know how deep that relationship goes though, he's been working for him for atleast 13 years.

He's really average, when I first saw his twitter pic I thought he was then I saw what he actually looks like and yikes

>Found Vice
>Leave Vice for "creative differences", throwing away literally tens of millions of dollars
>now advocates right-wing libertarianism, making a tiny fraction of what he would be making as a liberal at Vice
>somehow this is all a move to make easy money

are you a complete retard

Quality shitposting. Wouldn't expect anything less from based Straya.

God bless Australia.

Looks kind of like me, except for the neckbeard and the junkie eyes.

He works for Alex Jones. That's never good.

So you're mad people have been using the Internet to obtain new information?

But what if he only has a 5 inch cock? Your dreams come crashing down.

they think we are going to Molyneux him

he looks like a Jimmy Fallon that fucks dogs

That's a big problem facing humanity today. A lot of people are ill equipped to process so much new information accurately.

Throughout history you have paradigms in information, the written word and paper and the printing press and book reshaped society. Eventually people learn to read and also learn not to believe everything they read and be selective with respect to the information they are getting from books. The earliest books became immune from this (also happened to be religious texts) and are still causing all kinds of problems in modern human society up to this present day.

What I am 'mad' about is primarily that an overabundance of stimulating information shuts down the human mind and turns the person's brain into a sorting machine, and since when faced with rapid series of decisions which might have complex structures we abstract, it's far simpler to abstract into good and bad with respect to everything.

When you hit a critical computational limit, which we are approaching given out finite ability to process information (frames per second from visual stimulation, differentiating different noises per second) we suddenly are forced into a higher form of abstraction that of neutral thinking or passive observer. The reason someone high as a fucking kite is basically unresponsive and catatonic is that their brain is simply too stimulated to actually do any thinking or interacting outside of it's own internal auditing processes, which are desperately trying to resolve and conclude and return back to normalcy.

The internet as it is today is getting people high in much the same way. The danger of this is that we simply turn off our brains and stop thinking all together, trapped in a catatonic stream of happiness then later self-indulgent apathy.

Neutral passive observers logged on but completely disengaged from reality and other observers.

>FEm

doing gods work.

>cap
>shades
>black polo
>cig and beer

I never knew he was such a lad.

>tfw ugly

I can hear it now

Link to the video senpai

He's kind of an annoying piece of shit but I like him

...

he improved infowars so hes pretty cool.