Helmuth Nyborg argues that non-white immigration and improved health care (contraception, lowered infant mortality, etc) are tag-teaming the West's genetic fitness.
>This article briefly describes Lynn’s view on what makes modern populations rise and fall. It then provides
>a demographic analysis of what happens to modern sub-fertile high-IQ Western populations when
Internal Relaxation of Darwinian Selection (IRDS) combines with External Relaxation (ERDS, in the form of super-fertile low-IQ non-Western immigration) into Double Relaxation of Darwinian Selection (DRDS).
The genotypic IQ decline will ruin the economic and social infrastructure needed for quality education, welfare, democracy and civilization. DRDS is currently unopposed politically, so existing fertility differentials may eventually lead to Western submission or civil resistance.
Bumping, we don't have much scientific discussion on race anymore.
Michael Kelly
This guy sure is a genius. He also says that the far East is the only hope for civilization to go on.
Grayson Price
Does anyone have that galgert study?
Connor Jackson
oy vey
Camden Scott
Its not genocide if they aren't mass killing whites you fucking retards
Robert Cox
This needs to be spread far and wide, gentlemen.
I would argue under the banner of "European" genocide. Normies don't respond to "white".
Josiah Bailey
Probably because 90% of the people here now are Liberal Arts faggots.
Andrew Richardson
genocide does not means what you think it means, try again retards
Carter Rivera
>Please give me the smuggest anime girls you have
Colton Thompson
"the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation."
fuck you
Joshua Robinson
Why do beaners only use condoms in porn movies?
Daniel Phillips
"extermination"
- "killing, especially of a whole group of people or animals."
going extinct because you are a bunch of betas and no one will breed with you is not the same as being exterminated.
fuck you
Angel Parker
>The genotypic IQ decline will ruin the economic and social infrastructure needed for quality education, welfare, democracy and civilization. DRDS is currently unopposed politically, so existing fertility differentials may eventually lead to Western submission or civil resistance.
The dindus are fucked either way
Jack Torres
(a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Jack Martinez
This study is pure gold. Sad most of Sup Forums will not even bother reading it.
Xavier Rivera
ok
Ryder Collins
this, and just post memes about white genocide, instead of reading actual studies that prove its true beyond any doubt
Leo Jackson
the term "white priviledge" coincides with stage 3 genocide, deliberate marginalization of a target group.
open a book before spewing your dumb shit backed up by your angry conviction or else you just look retarded, and southern, to all of us.
Brody Kelly
>Breeding with negros and half indian spaniards, and inbreed terrorist will bring more capable humans yeah nah, eugenics when being spic is suffering
Camden Butler
It's not even 8 pages long, how can anyone not read it?
Easton Reed
so if i bombed a city with a nuke would that mean the people went extinct from not being nuke proof?
Cooper Barnes
Open it, oh gee it looks complicated, close it.
Leo Nelson
I consider this running up the score as a brown person tbqhwyf
I'll have some more white genocide please
Daniel Nguyen
If you want a sound mind, just look at it like this.
What you have is worth more than anything. And the rarer it becomes, the more value it has.
William Mitchell
holy fuck you are dumb as fuck
Isaac Hill
"exterminate" >to get rid of by destroying
It doesn't imply killing solely. Try again cuck.
Cameron Martin
None of that is happening.
Michael Perez
see
Grayson Roberts
A lot of good data there, but White genocide is somewhat beyond the scope of a non-political article.
Actually, all except e are happening.
Joshua Johnson
...
Thomas Evans
>Helmuth Nyborg
Well, he will never get published again.
Sebastian Miller
Well, let's see. >Killing members of the group Members of every possible "group" are killed on a daily basis. Non-starter. >Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group See above. >Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part What conditions are being inflicted? >Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group What measures have been "imposed" upon white people?
Gabriel Torres
You could argue, with the huge media push for interracial couples, that e is, in a way, happening.
Robert Bennett
>Killing members of the group Whites are routinely attacked by nonwhites. The reverse is rare. >Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group White guilt propaganda. >Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part Mass immigration, for one. >Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group Feminism and bringing women into the labor force has crashed the birthrate.
Gavin Young
>Killing members of the group South African Whites >Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group. Does the disparity in interracial rape and the consistent application of the White guilt and White privilege narrative not rise to this? >Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part. Pic related. >Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group Besides the constant overrepresentation of mixed couples in advertisements there is also "social science" to guilt us into race mixing. See >thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/no-blacks-is-not-a-sexual-preference-it-s-racism.html
Ryan Wood
>You could argue Only if you're retarded or completely dishonest. The interracial couples in pop culture that Sup Forums loves to cherrypick has nothing to do with stealing children. An actual example of this happening would be what was done to native families in both North America and Australia. If you string together all kinds of progressive nonsense and weave into a secret conspiracy by da Joos, of course it's going to seem like THEY are out to get you. Most victims of black violence are blacks. There is more black-on-white interracial violence than the reverse because there are more whites than blacks. Think about it. >falling for a troll who calls itself Emily Goldstein and publicly outs the "evil agenda" of your enemies No one is forcing anyone to breed outside of their race. Only the dumbest people would enter a mixed race relationship because of white guilt.
Asher Moore
>No one is forcing anyone to breed outside of their race. Only the dumbest people would enter a mixed race relationship because of white guilt.
Except that's not the definition The definition is ANY measure designed to prevent births within the group
That includes ones that aren't physically enforced And as sad as it is, the dumbest people are still people. And they are still part of their cultural group
Wyatt Perez
Except all this "progressive nonsense" is actively encouraged by the government, and they know that it will result in fewer White people.
Anthony Parker
It doesn't say "any", but it does say "imposing" measures. Do you know what impose means? To force something. Saying aww, don't you wanna fuck black people :( isn't committing genocide. Which government are you talking about? Are the feds trying to destroy the white race, even though most of the federal government is made up of white people? Or is it loudmouthed college professors who are considered crackpots by most of the country?
Lincoln Foster
>Most victims of black violence are blacks. There is more black-on-white interracial violence than the reverse because there are more whites than blacks. Think about it.
Entirely wrong. Pic related.
Luke Wilson
...
Jordan Garcia
Well, that is true, isn't it?
Luis Sullivan
>Are the feds trying to destroy the white race, even though most of the federal government is made up of white people thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-the-defense-department/ >Are the feds trying to destroy the white race With "republicans" talking about pardoning millioins of illegal immigrants, silent smuggling of Islamic migrants into our countries, paying blacks to move into white neighborhoods, and no effort to raise or encourage the raising of more kids in the white population, what other goal would all that achieve? >Or is it loudmouthed college professors who are considered crackpots by most of the country? >I personally know most of the country You're the loudmouth.
Jaxson Russell
Bumping with statistics.
Isaiah Hernandez
>(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Having it systematically drilled into you that you are evil and to atone must destroy yourself.
>(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Purposefully importing radically different groups that refuse to integrate into the host culture for the purpose of weakening one's sense of place in the world and belonging to one's own culture.
> (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
Feminism.
>(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
There have been cases of people having their children taken away because they support parties who's sole crime is having an immigration policy.
>On 31 October 2013 he was convicted of scientific misconduct by the Danish Council for Scientific Misconduct after a 2-year investigation concerning his paper The decay of Western civilization: Double relaxed Darwinian selection[5] published in Personality and Individual Differences >this decision was later overturned by a Danish court, clearing him of the charges >In 2015 the journal published an editorial commenting on the paper and concluding that Nyborg did not commit fraud or plagiarism >Nyborg successfully sued the UVVU to get the verdict annulled in March 2016
Colton Sanchez
>statistics >image contains no statistics
Luis Jones
I completely agree with this, but white genocide needs a new label, or it will never be taken seriously.
Aiden Wood
If you use the word very liberally, it applies.
Jackson Thomas
It is literally what it is. Re-branding it will only detract to the gravity of the situation.
Besides, what else are you going to call it?
Cooper Baker
...
Jason Clark
>genocide You think there is one thing that defines genocide?
Look ma a retard.
The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide. Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide: 1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and
2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide." Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity. Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (For full text click here) "Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Article III: The following acts shall be punishable: (a) Genocide; (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide; (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide; (d) Attempt to commit genocide; (e) Complicity in genocide. "
Owen Johnson
Trips don't lie, continued
The law protects four groups - national, ethnical, racial or religious groups.
A national group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by a common country of nationality or national origin.
An ethnical group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common cultural traditions, language or heritage.
A racial group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by physical characteristics.
A religious group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common religious creeds, beliefs, doctrines, practices, or rituals.
Usually people are born into these four groups. These four groups share the common characteristic that individuals are most often born into the group. While some individuals may change nationality or religion - or even adopt a new cultural, ethnic or racial identity - usually people do not choose their group identity. In genocide people are targeted for destruction not because anything they have done, but because of who they are.
Group idenity is often imposed by the perpetrators. Perpetrators of genocide frequently make group categories more rigid or create new definintions which impose group identity on individuals, eithout regard to peoples individual choices.
Levi Miller
Them 7s , continued
Key Terms:
The crime of genocide has two elements: intent and action. “Intentional” means purposeful. Intent can be proven directly from statements or orders. But more often, it must be inferred from a systematic pattern of coordinated acts.
Intent is different from motive. Whatever may be the motive for the crime (land expropriation, national security, territorrial integrity, etc.), if the perpetrators commit acts intended to destroy a group, even part of a group, it is genocide.
The phrase "in whole or in part" is important. Perpetrators need not intend to destroy the entire group. Destruction of only part of a group (such as its educated members, or members living in one region) is also genocide. Most authorities require intent to destroy a substantial number of group members – mass murder. But an individual criminal may be guilty of genocide even if he kills only one person, so long as he knew he was participating in a larger plan to destroy the group.
Angel Thomas
based West Virginia and North Dakota
Asher Gomez
Tl;Dr Genocide plain and simple even according to the UN's own definitions
Jonathan Cox
Genocide is the intentional action to systematically eliminate an ethnic, national, racial, or religious group.
google changed the definition, when you google it, it says kill, quite strange to tell you the truth Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.[10]
Samuel Long
The actual killing is really just the final stage. Mop-up, if you will.
John Martin
...
Aiden Martin
>No one is forcing anyone to breed outside of their race. Only the dumbest people would enter a mixed race relationship because of white guilt. It appears to be working, we do after all hear this from we are 4 years old and then for more than a decade 8 hours 5 day a week.
Leftist and jews are working on extermination of whites, they write articles about it all the time. Why is it only a lie when we warn about it?
Joseph Reyes
bump
Charles King
For a century or more there have been dreams of "proving" the superiority of this or that "race," class, sex, or other group by demonstrating a relation between brain size and IQ. Earlier studies used measures of head size and have been strongly discreditied on several grounds. For example, it turns out that there is little relationship between head size and brain size. More recent studies, using magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, which is assumed to be more accurate, have suggested some correlation between brain size and IQ. One recent study by American psychologist Lauren Flashman and colleagues suggested a small correlation of around 0.25. Again, though, we have to remember that there are many possible ways in which such a correlation could be brought about, other than a direct causal relationship. For example, that those individuals who have the culturally specific knowledge and self-confidence required for IQ tests are also better nourished, or are taller and heavier, and in turn because they come from better socioeconomic backgrounds. After all, a correlation between body size and brain size of 0.5 and 0.6 has long been known, and there have also been reports of an association between self-confidence and test performance. In addition, we have to remember that individuals with very small brains (less than half the average size) have been identified, and are otherwise perfectly normal. And female brains are about 15 percent smaller than those of males, with no apparent difference in intelligence.
William Miller
>And female brains are about 15 percent smaller than those of males, with no apparent difference in intelligence there is though
Jeremiah Sanders
>brain size is not strongly correlated with IQ >therefore all IQ tests are bullshit and everyone is the same
Zachary Perry
Yet another coincidence.
Tyler Ward
holy shit this is based
Brandon Anderson
...
Mason Williams
>(a) Killing members of the group; Interracial killings in Western countries more often than not involve Whites dying, which is a problem as Whites do not replace themselves at present.
>(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Interracial attacks more often than not involve Whites being the victim. The media and education system are currently waging a psychological campaign against Whites, particularly White males.
>(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Mass immigration will result in this by 2100 in most Western countries.
>(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; This one is more subtle, but the promotion of slut culture as well as readily available contraception (especially the pill) has resulted in plummeting birthrates in the West.
>(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. This one is rare, but certainly there are cases of parents having their children taken from them in Western countries because they want to homeschool them or some other reason that is completely unjustifiable.
You only need to tick one box.
Henry Rivera
WV hillman here. can agree, niggers only pass through to sell drugs, mostly in the north and eastern panhandles. they dont stay.
Ryder Thompson
Why are you even here you fuckhead?
Daniel Baker
wow. thanks for this OP. interesting. sometimes Sup Forums produces gems. its worth sifting through the blacked porn shitposts for these.