...
Untitled
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
nuxn.com
twitter.com
he's right you know
wait so who is reviewing this?
He's trying too hard
>songs for the deaf
Nice
The mentioned FB page, which I guess is satire.
See page mentioned, check out his FB page
This is very accurate though
Nice
Correct.
>2.7
>decimal system
instantly dropped
>If my son owned this on vinyl
Kek
it is accurate if you don't like the album because your tastes go about as deep top40 hits and ministry of sound compilations.
acknowledging this album is overblown hugely mostly by people that do not listen to it anywhere near as much as they claim, much like swans in general, but it is very good. groundbreaking even.
this 2bh pham
lmao
>The New Calassic - 1.2
>Angelic 2 the Core - 8
>Unkle Adams - 7.9
Fantano was serious when he said he was making his own memes.
...
...
flyover states were a mistake
...
>groundbreaking
Literally how?
Tryhard unfunny satire and these albums aren't even good in the first place
>d*rn
Damn I lost it
>Damn I lost it
No swearing, please
...
>Droppy
>Sad to hate on other people's artistic pursuits like that, Droppy!
>he knows what ministry of sound is
>so it means he used to listen to mainstream dance music
dude, are you 17? just because david guetta is shit doesn't mean swans is automatically great.
At least he's not a homofobic dad, right?
This page is 10/10
holy kek
is this unironic?
This page>>scaruffi and fantano
That's not the same page, I think the page just stole the logo
fantano changed his twitter name because of this review
Coolio
Happy Fathers' Day :)
>snoop dogg
>DJ
holy shit
gilmour fags are the worst
stop shilling on every thread, holy fuck
Here's your (You)
This. The joke is that the reviewer is stupid and behind the times because he can't understand why Soundtrack for the Blind is a good album. But the premise falls flat on its face because it really is a shitty album and 2.7 isn't very far below an accurate score.
Stop.
Well, ok then, let's hear your review Mr contrarian
I'm not a big Swans fan to begin with. I'd still take Soundtracks for the Blind over something like Filth, as Filth is one of the few albums that irritated me start to finish. Soundtracks has its irritating moments, mixed with some strokes of genius, but overall it's just a big, numbing and melancholic cacophony of stupidity.
Ok then, you just don't get it
Filth is better than SFTB though.
Early Swans > Neo-Swans
Maybe I'll never get it then, who knows. I just find swans head ache inducing
Sometime it just doesn't click for people.
I'm used to abrasive music because I grew up on Black Metal and Industrial shit.