Was ‘Ghostbusters’ Too Big to Succeed?

theringer.com/paul-feig-female-ghostbusters-too-big-to-succeed-72ede20c71dd#.qmz3k6wmb

What did she mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/Ghostbusters/status/738550858086940672?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
archive.is/https://theringer.com/paul-feig-female-ghostbusters-too-big-to-succeed-72ede20c71dd
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

FAT PEOPLE

pastebin, faggot.

Nobody is giving that shit click money.

>theringer.com
where do all these trash gossip sites come from

use archive for that, not gonna click

>What did she mean by this?
She means Sony, Feig, and strong womyn who don't need no man can't admit to themselves that the movie sucks so they need to blame everyone but themselves and try to rationalize their failure.

Fuck you. Go back to Sup Forums, bitch

>it will get 200 millions for sure!

For you.

...

Go fucking die you cunt

Why don't you fuck off Sup Forums?

>Ghostbusters feels like the result of Hollywood learning the wrong lessons from success. Hopefully, it can learn the right lesson from failure: The franchises studios can’t stop remaking were made as original properties, not born as three-movie marketing behemoths. We’ve forgotten how Ghostbusters became Ghostbusters.

Had to be one woman writing online that wouldn't be blinded by the rampant (read minimal) misogyny.

All this butthurt over a relatively on point column. Talk about defensive. Had you the wherewithal to realize you've become as laughable as what you criticize.

...

lol k, im still not clicking that shit

>twitter.com/Ghostbusters/status/738550858086940672?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

>male ghostbusters doing better in a commercial than the ghostbusters in the movies did

wew lad

the level of denial about this movie is unbelievable. the mental gymnastics these actors, producers, directors, and liberal journalists have to do must be exhausting.

⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠄⠄⢅⢅⢕⢕⢕⢵⢥⢄⠄⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠄⠅⢅⠕⠕⠅⠅⠕⠕⢕⢕⢕⢽⢽⢵⢄⠄⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠄⠅⠕⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⢕⢕⢕⢽⢽⢽⢵⢅⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠐⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠕⢕⢕⢕⢽⢽⢽⢽⢵⠄⠐⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⢕⢕⢕⢕⢽⢽⢽⢽⢕⠐⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⢕⢕⢕⢕⢽⢽⢽⢽⢝⠅⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠕⢕⢕⢕⢽⢽⢽⢽⢕⠅⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⢕⢕⢕⢽⢽⢽⢽⠅⠅⠐⠐
⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⢅⢕⢕⢕⢕⢵⢕⢅⢅⢕⢅⢅⢵⢵⢽⢽⢽⣽⢽⢕⢵⢵⢅
⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠕⠕⢝⢝⢝⢕⠕⠅⠅⢕⣽⣿⢽⢽⢽⢽⢿⢽⢵⢽⢿⠕
⠐⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠕⠕⠕⠅⠅⠅⢕⢽⣿⢵⢕⢕⢝⢝⢽⢽⢽⢝⠐
⠐⠐⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠕⢽⣿⢽⢵⢕⢕⢕⢽⢽⢕⠁⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠅⠕⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⢅⢕⠕⠅⠅⠅⠅⢕⢽⣿⣿⣽⢵⢕⢕⢽⢕⠅⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠐⠅⠅⠅⠅⢅⢕⢕⠅⠅⠅⠅⢅⢅⢵⢿⣿⢿⣿⢽⢕⢽⢽⢵⠅⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠐⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⢕⢵⢥⢅⠅⠅⢕⢕⢕⢵⢽⢽⣽⢽⢝⢽⣽⢽⠁⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠅⢅⠅⠅⠅⢕⠕⠕⢅⢅⠅⠅⢅⢕⢽⢽⢿⢽⢕⢽⢿⠕⠐⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠁⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⢕⢕⢕⢕⢽⣽⣿⢽⢽⢽⠕⠐⠐⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠁⠅⢅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠅⠕⢕⢕⢝⢽⢽⢽⢽⢝⠑⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠁⠕⢅⠅⠅⠅⠅⢅⢕⢕⢽⢽⢝⠑⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐
⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠁⠑⠕⠕⢕⢕⢝⢝⠝⠑⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐⠐

>make commercial for movie
>do not put bits from your movie for commercials tailored outside your target audience because you know it's just going to repel them

> don't need anyone, independent
> blame others and demand from them constantly

well from their perspective women are told that they can succeed at anything. when they don't, it's much easier to assume that someone else is stopping them than it is to realize what they were told is wrong.

No it wasn't too big to succeed. A different writer/director team, particularly one that wasn't interested in pushing a divisive socio-political agenda wrapped in a shitty script with poor direction, could have made a far better movie.

>yfw you were on the right side of the Ghostbusters/Suicide Squad war
>$208m world wide vs $572 world wide

KeK, this is more than enough proof of retards shiling their garbage here.

Just humbly admit you were wrong, and accept defeat, instead of trying to save face. Pathetic.

Guys if OP is a fag and doesn't post a pastebin/archive, just type

archive.is/

in the URL bar and paste the link to the article afterwards.

archive.is/https://theringer.com/paul-feig-female-ghostbusters-too-big-to-succeed-72ede20c71dd

It'll take you to all the snapshots of the page, and shitty clickbait like this is almost always archived by someone as soon as it's published. You could also do a keyword for it if you use Firefox.

Is this why there aren't more women in STEM fields? Because they're all busy writing pro-feminist manifestos to rationalize institutional failure of their ideology?