How do we prevent Islamic terrorism from now on?

How do we prevent Islamic terrorism from now on?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre
telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/26/everything-know-manchester-suicide-bomber-salman-abedi/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Prevent? Impossible.

With a cleansing. Kill them all before they can build any more bombs. Kill the kids before they learn to build bombs. Kill the women before they pop out any more bombs builders.

Prevent Islamic Terrorism from doing what?

Why?

By migrating to Australia and let those left idiots who created this shit sort it out.

Stop invading other countries for oil, killing thousands of people, leaving behind a mess with thousands of unemployed young men and countless weapons.

For a start, learn from Israel ways to handle it. I could never understand why is all democracies suffer from terrorism are dealing with Islamic fundamentalism and only Palestinians terror (which by what I've read is only made by Islamic Palestinians and not Christians Palestinians) is the result of the "occupation"

Because fighting terror is a reactionary strategy. We defend against one strategy, they move to another. Furthermore, we can't accurately predict what causes people to commit terror attacks. Two people of the same religion can have the same experience and one becomes a terrorist while another doesn't. Our theories about why someone becomes a terrorist are useless. We can't defend against tactics that are constantly changing and we can't predict which people are going to become terrorists.

Because it is an occupation, and the Palestinians are resisting an illegal occupation by a foreign power.

More citizens with guns, more firearm training, less military intervention in the middle east, better vetting of refugees

Yeah, it's a coincidence that so many terrorists are people who just happen to hear hate speeches in mosques as adolescence.

This tbh

that doesn't explain why Christians Palestinians (under the same " illegal occupation by a foreign power") have made zero terror attacks in history

Numbers confirm

WITNESED

kys. waste of sexes

oy

HOLY

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

US General reporting. We're just finishing tests on the new smell bomb. It finds anything that smells like kebab and blows it sky high. They'll never know what hit them.

Hory shet

Yes but think about all the people who heard that same hate speech and didn't become a terrorist. What is the difference between the two that makes one a terrorist and the other not?

Nice

checkd....

ease off on the drone strikes

I actually posted a short shitty message because i knew the get was coming
Suck it
I got , hoping for

>The glory
>The power

I see blue, he's glorious!

...

this

We pull out all troops and equipment
We then stop fucking with them.
We leave them to play in their sandpit
And kill each other

We need a 4th-chan reich

>who is Sirhan Sirhan?
>who is Chris Bandak?
>who is Wadie Haddad?
>who is George Habash?

...

Hate speeches are not magic. It doesn't turn everyone who hears them to a stupid terrorist fuck. But if just a small percentage of the people hearing them becomes a crazy fundamentalist - that's enough to have plenty of terrorists.
It's a numbers game, my stupid friend....

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre

Islam is a death cult. It hasn't changed since the pedophile Mohammed wrote his book. There is no New Testiment of the Koran either. There needs to be an Islamic reformation much like there was with the Catholic Church but don't hold your breath.

The Prime Minister must call a meeting with Army Intelligence, MI-6, CIA, Scotland Yard’s Intell and every other law enforcement agency in England. Then within 24 hours from last night, plot out a Tactical Plan for the execution of legal search warrants citywide. Then knock their fuckin’ doors down, drag their muslim ass out on to the streets at zero dark thirty. Completely search their buildings, their terror factory mosques and Universities. Lock up those who are peaceful and kill those who resist…

This has become a civil war, waged on unarmed citizens, by a trained and militarized colonization force of islamic savages…

The British Citizens must be going out of their minds. Their liberal socialist policies, have long ago stripped them of the ability to even defend themselves.

...

FAGGOT

...

but chich kebab is the only good thing they brought us :(

eh, it was already a mess. and none of their super-rich muslim brothers seem as interested in helping as we are. further, most of the muslim refugees are actually economic refugees from countries that have been poor forever, certainly long before bush or whatever.

the bottom line is: we aren't required to let this scum into our country under any circumstances. the problem is weak, corrupt "leaders."

wasn't the "Sirhan" guy the dude that shot Kennedy? was it because of the Israeli occupation?

You're asking why it's impossible to effectively defend against terror attacks. I pointed out that it's because the actual tactics change constantly so we always have to defend against new things. I also pointed out that there's no effective means of determining what will lead someone to terrorism, as two people can have the same experience while one becomes a terrorist and one does not. All you came back with was "muh mosque hate speech," like it's the end all answer. I can tell you're not debate team material so it's not like I'm having a discussion with an equal but if you can't add substance to a discussion then it's best not to join in at all.

Yes. In 1989, he told David Frost, "My only connection with Robert Kennedy was his sole support of Israel and his deliberate attempt to send those 50 bombers to Israel to obviously do harm to the Palestinians."

tag ur it

What?
i was talking about G.W.Bush and his puppy dog Tony Blair creating ISIS by invading Iraq in 2003, and leaving behind a breeding pool for terrorism. Something that (almost) all experts predicted before the invasion, btw.

What you call terrorism now is a direct result of this.
btw: what were you expecting, when declaring war on IS, and bombing Mosul? That all bad things would happen down there in the desert? The London attacks are IS's way of conducting the war. You have noone else to blame for this than you present and past leaders, and those who voted for them.

All terrorist have the same experience, (hearing hate speeches) but not all those who experienced that become terrorists.
you're inability to understand that sort of arguments explains why you automatically turn to ad hominem

>All terrorist have the same experience
This is simply not true. Don't engage in a discussion you're not capable of following.

>All terrorist have the same experience

what percentage of those terrorists were not exposed to hate speeches (at mosques or online)?

holy fuck, nicely done

>Because fighting terror is a reactionary strategy. We defend against one strategy, they move to another.
This. The only way to actually prevent terror attacks is to know what they're planning to do before they actually do it. It's easier for them to change strategies than it is for us to defend against them.

>All terrorist have the same experience
Is that based on your years of experience as a psychologist interviewing captured terrorists and asking them what lead to them becoming terrorists?

yeah, and i'm saying i don't give a fuck. like i said, they shouldn't be here. you can't commit acts of terror if you're not in the country.

even under trump, the united states is allowing tens of thousands of islamic refugees into the country, most of them adult men, most of them economic refugees (not fleeing from war), and all of them want sharia law to replace democracy.

the terrorists came into the country legally and everything they did was legal, until they murdered innocent people.

also, i didn't actually declare war on these individuals. believe it or not, if i had my way, we wouldn't be killing them, we wouldn't be admitting them into the country and we wouldn't be helping any of them in any way. as far as i'm concerned, muslims aren't worth the u.s. tax money it costed to make the bombs that obama dropped on them.

like i said, weak, corrupt "leaders."

Simple. Round up all Muslims and burn them.

If we stopped overthrowing the dictators that keep extremists in check we might find we have fewer problems with terrorists.

No. I based this on your long life experience as a psychologist that determine that its "a reactionary strategy" and there's nothing to do but bend over

You are aware that most of the terrorists (France and UK attacks) were local citizens born there, not refugees. Or are you?

honestly, i don't concern myself with the doings of other countries. i am a u.s. citizen who really only cares about the condition of my own country.

that being said, i seem to recall that many of them were the children of refugees. which means what you just wrote really doesn't contradict my original point.

Exterminating a religion by killing all its followers? I think that I've read something like this in a book about 20th century history once.

It's not preventable, it's instructed clearly in the devil book that they all follow. The solution is to move it to islamic countries, (deportation?) nobody cares about violence in these backwards islamic sand toilet countries, we just need to somehow keep it out of civilized White Western nations.

A reactionary strategy is a strategy one adopts as a reaction to events. After 9/11 we reacted by guarding against cockpit intrusion. After the attempted shoe bombing we reacted by increasing preflight screening. After attempted liquid bombings we reacted by banning liquids on flights. Do you see where I'm going with this? It's much harder for us to defend against a constantly changing plan of attack than it is for them to constantly change their attacks. I'm sorry you don't understand why defending against terror is a reactive strategy. I didn't invent the English language I just understand it.

>i seem to recall that many of them were the children of refugees
Human recollection has been scientifically proven to be unreliable. Citation is required for your claim.

What if we just had a homogeneous nation free of hostile foreigners?

>i am a u.s. citizen who really only cares about the condition of my own country.
Well, thaen please take care that your government keeps its fingers off other nations. Which basically means stopping bombing dozens of nations all around the world,

This would make the world a much more peaceful place, and eradicate the main cause for terror.

Genocide

With Deus Vult

like your muslim friends, i can see that a little babysitting is required for you.

telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/26/everything-know-manchester-suicide-bomber-salman-abedi/

Same way you take away the power leaders have.

Eliminate currency.

Then we wouldn't be the nation based on liberty that we claim to be, and we would be abandoning the principles that we were founded on in the name of security.

lol, this is a like meme.
For Syria doesn't really have oil, its a poor country. the next time some middle-eastern starts murdering his own people, i say let them.
least i wont have to hear this shit anymore

I do understand. Keep dealing with the symptoms and not the root of the disease. Keep dealing with the "how they do that" and not the "why do they do it".
Its gonna be lots of fun.

>i seem to recall that many of them were the children of refugees
>talks about one person
I can tell you speak English as a second language because one person is not "many."

Since le pen didn't got elected, more are to follow.
I'm guessing everyone wants to die.

Syria was actually very prosperous before the West incited and aided an illegal rebellion against the lawful government there.

see

we're trying. that's a major reason why people voted for trump tbh.

he ran a populist "america first" campaign, while hillary ran a globalist, bleeding-heart ticket.

truth is, we'll never have an ideal candidate. we'll only have choices. trump is not perfect. but he was a better choice than hillary.

I remember.

Visit Sup Forums?

haha. well, that's one more than you've talked about.

besides, you are capable of piecing together that these muslim terrorists are not europeans.

This is a random topic.
Everything is a random topic.
I'm certain this is not too hard to understand

There's nothing you can do really. You can kill every Muslim but you can't kill the religion. You can kill people but not ideologies. Terrorists will always exist, sad but true.

>777420
>777
>420
>777777
>6's
>7's

There's always option b

ally with Iran instead of Saudi Arabia. they hold elections there and are more peaceful than the israelis.

yes, countries in the middle-east were always prosperous and peaceful until the pesky european showed up, didnt you know?

>we're trying. that's a major reason why people voted for trump tbh.

Then let us hope that the attack on the syrian airfield was a singular event, and that Trumps campaign on North Korea is a hoax.

>he was a better choice than hillary.

With regard to our topic here, I agree. Clinton would most likely already have started war on Iran by now.

You want to deal with the root? Deploy 500,000 troops to the Middle East indefinitely, supporting an equal number of doctors, schoolteachers for children, and people to train the adults in skills like electrical work, construction, plumbing, welding, agriculture, and all other skills necessary for a people to have a functioning society. Undertake the most ambitious nation building project since the Marshall Plan and in 20 years you will have a Westernized population. Want a short term fix? Stop trying to topple the dictators who keep terrorist groups in line, like Saddam did, like Gaddafi did, like Assad is trying to do.

Syria was.

option Sup Forums

>kept terrorists groups in line
>just like the Italian government does with the mafia.

Hail satanic trips

Iranians in the pre-Islamic Revolution time were very much like people in any Western country. We kinda fucked that up by installing a dictator who only managed to add steam to the Islamic population he was trying to suppress.

...

Exactly.

haven't you ever watched a movie, you can't exterminate humans so easily.
they'll just make more bombs

Apples and oranges. The mafia is organized crime, the goal of which is to make money. The mafia is not based on religious texts. Italy has trouble with the mafia for the same reason why America used to have problems with them. The mafia makes lots of money and politicians and law enforcement are easily corruptible.

Not sure how it's different. All of this is for business even under the guise of religion.

>Not sure how it's different.
Then you haven't been paying attention.