Why are you scared of being called a racist?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

1917.com/Marxism/Trotsky/HRR/1-1.html
humanbiologicaldiversity.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>Words aren't made up by people

YOU FILTHY RACIST !!!!!

>They fall from the sky

The first recorded usage of the word "racism" in the Oxford English Dictionary was from Richard Henry Pratt back in 1902 when he was talking about racial segregation.

Stop being such a faggot and do some research, you're the worst kind of Sup Forums.

Because in this day, it has consequences because people are so weak that they allow words to hurt them

No word has ever hurt me, and I'd like to see the day where someone breaks my arm by saying hello

OP is there proof of this?

I have no idea how do they expect to attract people to their point of view when they lie 90% of time.
That's totally futile in an age where information can be reached by few clicks. They think they are "converting" people but in reality it's just a bunch of autists who spend a lot of time here and are a loud minority.

I'm honestly not. I get called a racist all the time and I just laugh it off. I don't justify myself to anyone. I try to keep quiet around niggers though, they tend to be violent apes against the white man (and also each other).

>reeee someone else said it first

Missing the point to be pedantic, but you're autistic. You're so triggered, it must mean so much to you. Did it ruin your day to have to see this post?
>proof of this?
without seeing Sperg anons proof, Trotsky did use the term to label and censure those who placed value on ethnicity:

>

>"Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, has based its philosophy upon the assumption that the Russian people and their church are democratic through and through, whereas official Russia is a German bureaucracy imposed upon them by Peter the Great. Mark remarked upon this theme: "In the same way the Teutonic jackasses blamed the despotism of Frederick the Second upon the French, as though backward slaves were not always in need of civilised slaves to train them." This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the ’racists.’"

The Slavophiles which Trotsky alluded to were historically a group of traditionalist Slavs who valued greatly their native culture and way of life, and wanted to protect it. Trotsky on the other hand saw them and others like them as an impedement to his internationalist communist plans for the world. This man didn’t care one iota about the Slavic Russians whom he supposedly served. To him, Slavophiles, i.e. Slavs that committed the "crime" of loving their own people and trying to protect their traditional ways were simply "backward", and others like them were simply "racists".

>Этo кpaткoe зaмeчaниe иcчepпывaeт дo днa нe тoлькo cтapyю филocoфию cлaвянoфилoв, нo и нoвeйшиe oткpoвeния "pacиcтoв".

> 1917.com/Marxism/Trotsky/HRR/1-1.html

A lie is different from an error. Calling something a lie just because you don't like it is a libel. And you're a hypocrite, or too stupid to tell when you're contradicting yourself, or both.

;^)

Okay then, how do you expect to attract people to your point of view when you're wrong 90% of time?

>you're wrong 90% of time?
Are you a mod, with a graph of my posting behavior based on my IP, or are you still stuck in rhetorical hyperbole and libel mode? When you exaggerate like you breathe, you have no credibility. Would you like to discuss the topic like an adult, instead of flailing to defame the poster?

Lev Bronstein liked nothing more than dead Russian farmers.

Here we go, russian communist are pure evil souce of every degeneracy against the pure holy american capitalism who dindu nothing wrong

>yet another SJW opening with a butthurt-sounding insult
leftypol are bunch of whiny bitches

I love how you are presuming I'm a liberal.
And there's nothing to discuss. Picture in OP you used to start the thread is wrong as you say. What's the point of this thread?

>lose my job
>lose my place at University
>be a target of public abuse and shaming including threats or even assaults


In this day and age, the only people who can afford to not be scared of being called racists are those who can make an entire career out of being called a racist, like Milo Yiannopolous or Gavin Mcinnes.

Why are you scared of being called a racist -- so scared, you piss in our sea of piss instead of answering the question?

Because racism is immoral?

SJW is as SJW does

;^)

Is it?
Why?

What a real response is needed for that.
The last retard on earth know that discussion about racism were everywhere in the XIX but now it's a lenin invention

I don't know. What's the point of all this useless shitposting faggotry monteNEGRO?

Both groups are saquine

Why are you afraid of being called a racist?
Why are racists immoral?

it's RACIST to identify your rapist....

I'm racist and i don't care aboit the christians universalist moral what's the point ?

...

Because non-immoral racism is called race realism.

Racism is the toilet stuff done by retarded neo-nazis in subway stations at 2:00 in the morning. It's inherently degenerate in its entire usage.

Do the TSA call it 'racism' when they stop and search Muslims more than anyone else. No they call it 'racial profiling'. Because Open Racism is the acsocial white equivalent of the Nigger chimpout.

Discriminating against someone based off of something they had no control over is vile as a concept. It is the equivalent of judging a person guilty before any trial and without any evidence. It is, in its essence, an unethical and disagreeable stance. You can be racist if you want, like many are despite this, but you cannot hand waive that it is immoral.

>I'm racist and i don't care
>what's the point?
I don't know, why are you posting in the thread?

...

Racism is unity. Racism is strength.

Because it's based on false presumption that every individual of certain race is automatically biologically inferior to every individual of another race.
In the end races don't matter, what matters is the culture, however two are practically tied because for example immigration of blacks to Europe will necessarily bring African culture to Europe, which creates problems.
But it's still important to distinguish between impact of race and impact of culture, because racism is a never-ending ride.
As we saw in WW2 Nazis were racist against other people of their own race, backed by pseudo-science.
I'm not scared of being called a racist especially since today that term is used too liberally, I'm just not a racist, racism is for idiots.
>b-but race influences culture!
Nope.

>a made up word
so was every word before it was a word you dumb idiot

Racism is not a individual's logic igt's about group.

It's like saying germany attack us so we must kill every german we met, it's common sense

It's RACIST to criticize ISIS.

Beheading people is not their fault now, is it?

That's not racism. You're subscribing to modern definition of the term that also thinks that criticizing Islam is racist, despite the fact it's an ideology/religion.
Racism is pseudo-scientific and based on biological supremacy.

>non-immoral racism is called race realism
>immoral racism is what retarded neo-nazis do
What's the difference?
>Discriminating against someone based off of something they had no control over is vile as a concept
Do you hire people to be UFC fighters who are quadrapalegic? You discriminate constantly based on things that people had no agency in. This happens throughout nature. Calling it vile/immoral doesn't explain why it's vile/immoral.
Why is it immoral/vile?

>it's based on false presumption that every individual of certain race is automatically biologically inferior
Are you sure?
What about this user's distinction:Any merit to race-realism?

Anti-racism SJW joins ISIS...

It is eternal conflict and division. Racism =/= Racial individualism. It creates inferior and superior classes. It is the natural route to wars and subjugation between races rather than peaceful separation or peace of any kind

In a racist world, peace can only be achieved when one race remains

"Anti-racist" SJWs attack White heritage group with metal bars, hammers etc. in public restaurant.

What's race realism?
Saying blacks have lower IQ? Sure they do, but how does that impact society?
Do you think blacks should be automatically considered criminal because of their lower IQ?
How about declaring everyone with an IQ lower than 130 inferior?
That's the problem with racism, you never lack enemies once you go down that path.
Not to mention lower black IQ is the product of their socio-economic status. It's still lower than white according to that research I saw, but gap is a lot smaller once you raise them in same conditions.

It's a question of average, not individual.

When i pick like exemple a war, i mean that even if not every german is a ennemy, german are ennemy , so every german become an ennemy even if they not deserve it in a individual case.

Same thing for race a west african can be superior to a englishmen but when we talk about groups it's not possible anymore

Why are you implying I am OP
Just because I don't go around with my power level on display like some stormfag doesn't mean I'm afraid of owning my racism and nationalist ideology

That's rambling and ambiguous, I'm looking for simple answers pls.
So race-realism is a valid concept?
Do you still consider it racism, and is it immoral?

That's war, that's not racism. Racism would be "Germans are all violent brutes, they must be wiped out" This was the sentiments being tossed around WW2 ironically enough. Immoral then, immoral now

That is a specific instance, and has nothing to do with quality of life. Only those with a good work ethic and intellect can become a medical doctor. But those without those things have many avenues of life open to them. Racism limits all avenues, and significantly lowers your quality of life in all spheres, because it will permeate and hinder anything you try to accomplish. It will see you assaulted, put in prison, given arbitrarily lower quality of service, lower quality of education. The list goes on

Here I would apply some common sense.
Would I oppose 2 million Nigerians coming to my country? Yeah.
Would I discriminate against a single Nigerian who's clearly a good person/worker? Nope.

...

>That's war, that's not racism. Racism would be "Germans are all violent brutes, they must be wiped out"
So, you're saying racism is immoral when it commits a fallacy of excessive generalization?

Well if you told me what race-realism is, I could answer you.

I honestly couldn't care less if people think I'm a racist.

sandwiches are racist....

...

>what is race-realism
Accepting that:
>races exist
>society is a biological construct
That might be simplistic, but I think it's accurate.
I've seen this site linked before by race-realists:

>humanbiologicaldiversity.com/

pic also related

"Anti-racist" SJW speaks....

>races exist
Sure.
>society is a biological construct
Nope, as evidenced by different European societies in different conditions and time periods. External factors are clearly so dominant they make biological factors irrelevant. Unless we're talking about extremes like Pygmies.

It's a analogy

It is not what i said?

Again i don't talk about iindividu

Racism is a fallacy of generalization in the way it manifests daily. You make snap judgements about someone (mostly negative) based on their race immediately after you see them.

>society is not a biological construct
>external factors make biological factors irrelevant
There is no biological basis to human civilization?
Can you construct a civilization like those of Europe today with the intellectual capacity of pigeons?

I asked specifically if racism is negative WHEN it involves an overly broad generalization, is that what you're arguing?

...

But it does not make much sense. If Germans attack, you will defend yourself against German combatants (who can be easily identified) "Every German you see"? Does this include civilians? If you did so assuming they are evil because they are German and would attack you because of their race, yes that is racism and is immoral.

Well yes, but that is how racism manifests. Can you tell me when it does not involve broad generalizations based on stereotypes?

When is a generalization "overly broad" about reasonably large groups? How do you determine that?

How can I become a professional racist?
I hate niggers

I'm not, I openly express my disdain for shitskins and Semites.

Im not. Are you?

So what in case of total war you don't drop bomb on civilian, you let them live because it's generalisation?

It's true thsse people don't want to harm you, if you ask to them they will probably share some würste with you.

You have non oyher choice than making generalisation because one, it's physically impossibe to treat every individuality, two there is a chance you make a mistake

...

You couldn't be more wrong.

Why can't different races exist separately from each other and coexist separately and peacefully?

Could it be because some races are shit and thus create shit countries? Could it be that some races are prone to violence and corruption?

Where's the line then, you dumb fuck?

What happens after you've let it 500,000 individual Nigerian workers over the course of 10 years and they reproduce like rabbits. Soon they total 2 million easily and now they demand that you let in the other 1.5 million? What happens then, you stupid fucking nigger?

>Islamophobia

Sup Forums was right again

No, I love calling out jews irl for pulling jewish bullshit.

It's like the secret +10 damage attack in this stupid game, they just freeze up and stop fighting back like a child that got caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

>homophobia

Sup Forums was right again!!!!

Capitalist was a word made up by a socialist too yet rich greedy fucks embrace it like a badge of honor

>"White privilege"

Sup Forums was right AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm not scared of it, I just don't want to be it.

Racism is lame