>Russia’s will deploy its new RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missiles to units in Siberia and the southern Urals when the enormous new weapon becomes operational in 2018.
>The Sarmat will weigh at least 100-tons and carry a 10-ton payload. That means the missile could carry as many as 15 independently targeted thermo-nuclear warheads. It has a range of at least 6,000 miles. Once it is operational, it will be the largest ICBM ever built.
nationalinterest.org
Other urls found in this thread:
theguardian.com
twitter.com
>Implying size of missile matters in a full nuclear exchange
cluster tsar bomba when???
Let's all join together and welcome Russia to the 1990's.
>loading all your nukes into a giant rocket
I can think of several ways that this would end badly
Meanwhile, in the US... "Do our nukes still even work?" "Is it a big deal if Russia learns that we don't know if our nukes even work?" "Meh. Whatever."
We have land based and sea based equivalents that have a longer range and fly faster.
Mfw DARPA didn't fall for the windows 10 meme and are still running on the winxp bullet train.
>microsoft controls american nukes
we big corp now
Probably controls France nukes too...
Wouldn't that be easy as fuck to just shoot down?
I`m sure it`s only a test site yet.
This thread will define the first 10 test-targets.
Pretty sure that at this point everyone is so afraid of nukes that if based Putin went full madman and nuked someone, no one would retaliate. And i'm not even talking about irrelevant countries.
Pretty sure all the computers linked to our nuclear stuff are purged of anything remotely resembling windows.
Jokes on them if they used the French Linux meme mint
has been described as trying to hit a flying bullet with another bullet
This is why an army doesn't matter. One of these missiles would level a fucking country.
Today's armies are for proxy wars, nothing else.
>nuke
>level an entire country
no
USA! USA! USA!
HHHNNNNNNNGG
You know what I'm hinting at you moron.
Maybe a little European shit hole, but it would take a lot more than one nuclear device to destroy an entire nation...
Come on Sven
One nuclear device in the right place would "destroy" the modern world by crashing the markets.. so that's irrelevant.
I'm talking about the outcome of one of these missiles. 10 heavy nuclear warheads in ONE missile with the power of 2-3MT PER warhead, means the country it would hit would basically collapse instantly.
that you have absorbed enough refugee cum from your wife that you ceased to understand how nuclear weapons work?
>implying it dies not.size = fuel=stronger engine=range.
Take your autism medicine already Pablo, it's not good for you to be this this trigger happy.
The Russians built your mom a dildo, OP.
...
>10 ton throw-weight for a 100 ton missile, compared to the same but with a 200 ton missile in the Satan
P-pottery!
>in contrast Trident II D-5 has like 2.8 tons for a 59 ton missile.
Throw weight. It can carry more warheads and penetration aids.
He does know what you're talking about as evident by him calling you on your bullshit.
Nukes cannot replace ground armies.
Cute
t. Michael Dudikoff
Trump promissed to modernize American nuclear rocket arsenal but if he will start in 2017 it will take more than 10 years to renew just a portion of the arsenal. And it will cost tens of trillions of dollars while increasing that debt.
Anti missile defense missile?
I don't get Russia. Quality of life is shit but they keep investing in these projects.
I do believe Russia is invincible though. There are way to many of them, they have way too many nukes, rockets and tanks and it's just simply to big to ever conquer.
Why would they need to replace then when they can annihilate them before they become useful?
dem nuke bearing hips.
Doesn't this go against the Non Nuclear Proliferation Treaty?
>15 warhead MIRV
Yeah good luck with that, it will break apart like most Russian junk.
Military isn't even the biggest source of spending in US. Just cutting welfare and pensions would allow to increase army budget by 80% and at the same time repay all debt in less than 25 years. Old people cannot revolt and niggers can be easily rounded up.
Most French critical military equiment runs on linux Solaris, for obvious self-reliance reasons (same reason they developed their own nuclear technology when Americans offered to give them American nukes)
They need to work on satellite frying technology to combat enemy nukes, considering most utilize GPS. Knock out its guidance system and the nuke can't reach its destination, unless it uses our system, inertial guidance. But Americans and Russians aren't smart enough for that.
But from what I gather a ballistic missile is fired toward the nuke and locks onto it when a nuclear missile is fired and its goal is to shoot it out of the sky before it reaches orbit and the MIRV breaks apart and each warhead travels to its designated poop plot.
>niggers can be easily rounded up.
Are you sure you talking about USA in 21 century? After chimpouts niggers get even more attention and pity.
Also, you never noticed those fucking Bernfags? They take everything for granted and want even more free shit imagine their butthurt and resentment if you cut welfare and pensions.
What is quality of life for you? "Economy growth" can mean more tool-making machines, food, cars and weapons, it can also just mean luxury brand/housing bubble getting bigger. The latter is not something to brag about, especially when it's attracting welfare nigs.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not,"
-Thomas Jefferson
t. Bong who has no independent nuke policy whatsoever. Remote det. Tridents anyone?
We should invest in nano technology, swarms of nano bugs that can rip apart things. Like in that movie with Keanu Reeves? Forgot the name of it, but all these things eat away at metal and shit.
Can we invent those? Get on that shit.
a sensible beluarussian
I salute you sir
None of this defense spending cold war nonsense would be necessary if Americans focused on fixing their country which is in terrible shape and stop building military bases around Russia and China
>Knock out its guidance system and the nuke can't reach its destination
rockets for decades use star maps to navigate the path to the target, and today they have precise topographic maps of the terrain and they recognise features to navigate.
How was the Battle of Nations dude u__u
Trident is fully independent though, this myth of it being reliant on US satellites is just that, a myth.
France's nuclear deterrent is actually reliant on USA, we used to be dependent on the USA when we used Polaris.
Trident nukes are altered in the UK.
So don't try it Mr Chinky Chong.
I was watching together with you, remember? It was hosted in Chechia, not here.
>rockets for decades use star maps to navigate the path to the target
Yes, it's called Inertial Guidance. Your missiles don't use that anymore since the revolution of GPS you fucktard.
I already mentioned that, the UK is the only nuclear armed nation that utilizes this means of delivery and isn't reliant on GPS.
DUHHHH BRAIN.
But their submarine fleet is of a similar size and capability to America, and the US hasnt developed any new ICBM technology or given much funding to their strategic missile forces since the end of the cold war.
Our current nukes are fine but they're reaching the end of their lifespan and will need to be replaced soon. The problem is with the total testing ban we can't test new weapons so we'll either have to reuse badly outdated designs or build nukes that can't be tested in any capacity before being deployed. We could also just test them in secret and deny it when seismologists say we were testing nukes but that's pretty Nork tier shit to pull.
Trust me when I say that, the people who developed these things, understand a thing or more about it than you.
>France's nuclear deterrent is actually reliant on USA
French warhead on French vectors carried by French submarines and mirages.
Damage control sven, damage control.
How do you know anything about the guidance systems of Russian or Chinese rockets and rockets that were developed before countries had sufficient sattelite groupings to provide for satellite navigation?
>most utilize GPS. Knock out its guidance system and the nuke can't reach its destination, unless it uses our system, inertial guidance. But Americans and Russians aren't smart enough for that.
Good laugh m8 nicely joked
and they need this why?
So you will die very very surely if needed
To blow things up, I guess.
You talk of proxy wars lightly, as if they're something unimportant. But since everything apart from nuclear annihilation falls into this category, you still need army for occupations, annexations, forcibly changing governments. You know, all the fun.
>all
Dumb burgerposter
Vladimir was tired of fake ITS HAPPENING threads on Sup Forums, and decided to take matter into his own hands.
The US has none of that, you moron. Get with the times.
I'm pretty sure russian nukes use inertial guidance as well. Since GLONASS came fully operational only a few years ago, and relying on GPS would be strange. Moreover, navigational satellites' signals can easily be suppressed or even falsified.
>Lets build something that we can never use and if we do, It would ensure we would be wiped out also.
Putin again showing what a economic genius he is while is country bankrupts itself.
I like Putin, but he legit is retarded.
Ultrasound rocketry guidance can be based only on hadrons- and quasi- particles detection arrays.
You talking about American off-shore millitary bases? You even have 1 or 2 in Antarctica? What are you afraid there? Pinguins? Tax payers money spent on some bullshit and you try to educate us
>economy after nuclear war
Top kek
>mfw when the activation switch for all american nuclearwarheads was at one point 00000000
>Trident is fully independent
>Without the cooperation of the US, says the report of the independent all-party Trident Commission, the life expectancy of the UK's nuclear capability could be measured in months.
>The commission's high level panel says it agrees that Britain's deterrent is "a hostage to American goodwill".
>"If the United States were to withdraw their cooperation completely, the UK nuclear capability would probably have a life expectancy measured in months rather than years".
eyy.
>"The UK is dependent on the United States for many component parts of the guidance and re-entry vehicle, and for the Trident ballistic missile system itself".
>this myth of it being reliant on US satellites is just that, a myth
deny it all you want/ call it a myth still won't change the fact that UK has no independent nuke policy.
>France's nuclear deterrent is actually reliant on USA, we used to be dependent on the USA when we used Polaris.
Unlike you the Frogs actually have their own missile(M51) and the support structure for it.
>Trident nukes are altered in the UK.
>Not only are Britain's Trident missiles in a common pool shared with the US and maintained in Kings Bay, Georgia, its nuclear warheads are designed and maintained at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston with the help of US know-how, as recently declassified documents on the UK-US Mutual Defence Agreement confirmed.
Given that nuke warheads are complex stuff you can't just hand a couple of dudes a manual to teach em how to tinker with it you'll have a couple US technicians/ specialists working on these warheads alongside their UK counterparts.And since nuke warheads are like precision engineering on steroids its not that hard to futz it up- maybe wire that one bit of the detonator wrong so it doesn't explode at the right moment etc. etc. Then there is the missile itself...
the rest here:theguardian.com
>2011+5
>liquid fueled
what town are u in n whats the reason fir the visit?
If Russia will go bankrupt, these missiles will be controlled by locals, that want anglo to pay the debts. For "new deal" aka "stalin industrialization", where 60 million people died, for cooperation with jewish oligarchs after 1991, for founding and funding 3rd international, for founding and funding ISIS, for fabianism, etc.
Putin has just secured his place as the colony ruler as the less demanding force. Or so you should think.
You realize that in the days before satelites Russians had the best maps in the world, right? They had mapped our countries with better accuracy than we had at that time.
Poland spreads aids and lies about the real reason.
You should nuke uk to change the landscape, then we wont be able to attack anyone.
Minuteman iii is still better.
Don't forget the revolution and the WWII. These were anglos too, and I am not joking.
>Michael Dudikoff
kek
Holy shit
>Bush
Out to go Neo-con
You're correct Sven. You're still a cuck. But you're not an incorrect cuck.
>has been described as trying to hit a flying bullet with another bullet
Which isn't all that hard if the bullets are self guided and machine controlled... Future of warfare is autonomous action.
>Are you sure you talking about USA in 21 century? After chimpouts niggers get even more attention and pity.
You place the National Guard in a city with niggers and they behave. Niggers don't tend to be organized well and refuse to cooperate with each other. Most who rioted in the cities just saw it as an opportunity to cause mayhem and steal stuff. They're self serving and will betray each other at the slightest chance of fulfilling their own needs.
>Also, you never noticed those fucking Bernfags?
Most Bernouts are made out of SJW's and progressives. They require safe spaces for their feelings, do you honestly they'll be able to handle firing a gun or having someone fire back at them? I don't the frail little feminine pussy boy has the balls to do it.
I just want to know when it will be time for the leftist to be atrocitied
those down pointing nipples, though
usa, more than 2 centuries of right wing conservative govt., and you blame for the chaos an oldfag that never was or ever be the president and a bunch of sissies that follow him on instagram.
>our system, inertial guidance
You know that technology was invented in the United States and then given to it's allies, including you, right?
>60 million people died
Nice meme.
>Which isn't all that hard if the bullets are self guided and machine controlled
When the 'bullets' are traveling miles per second it is, you basically need a nuclear explosion to have a chance at destroying it
>credibility of ussr statistics
also you don't even know which targets you're supposed to hit. The insane throw weight means that a single rocket puts some nukes, dozens of decoys/penetration aids and jamming equipment on a path towards your important infrastructure. You have a ridiculously small reaction time. And that these things have insane range doesn't make it easier either since it means that they can come from pretty much any direction. I don't know when the soviets started with that, but at some point they started to increase the range of their ICBMs so that they could theoretically hit the US over the south pole, making the missile defense systems on the west coast and in alaska basically useless.
>statistics are only credible when they support my argument
>implying that Stalin regime was killing only in USSR
Nice one Ivan
I would love to see the impact zone of an MIRV test, must look fucking awesome. Also just imagine the 250kT explosions at the end of these rays. If it ever comes to a full blown nuclear exchange we are all fucked.
>implying we cuckupied Poland before the end of industrialization