The myth of East Asian intellectual superiority

For those wondering how come East Asians comprise the smartest ethnic groups when Caucasians are responsible for the major technological and cultural revolutions in humankind:

>East Asians, although having a higher average IQ, have much lower IQ variations within their population.
>That means it is uncommon for East Asians to exceed 120 IQ points, but it's also uncommon for them to score below 100 IQ points.

>Caucasians have a much wider range of IQ variation, which means Caucasians have a much higher population of individuals with an IQ considerably higher than 135, but also a much higher population with an IQ below 95.

>This gives Caucasian populations a major advantage when it comes to technological and cultural improvements, with the downside of having greater disparity of intelligence within the population.
>The lack of eugenic maintenance within Caucasian populations is what has led to its considerable decline, although small changes, such as the removal of unfit individuals could very easily lead these populations to a 2nd Age of Enlightenment.

Still considering yourself a member of an inferior race?

Other urls found in this thread:

surveynuts.com/surveys/take?id=75274&c=1010177097TRVH
reddit.com/r/AsianMasculinity/comments/46syr3/how_to_win_geopolitical_arguments_you_will_hear/
hmg.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/suppl_1/R27.full
scholar.harvard.edu/files/srichard/files/richardson_sexing_the_x.pdf?m=1374974674
lagriffedulion.f2s.com/sft.htm
haaretz.com/jewish/news/.premium-1.551825
timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-descend-from-350-people-study-finds/
nytimes.com/2013/10/09/science/ashkenazi-origins-may-be-with-european-women-study-finds.html?_r=0
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Bumping for awareness. Providing images soon.

A more accurate representation to visualize.

Its really not a huge issue. Who cares if asians have an IQ of 105 or not?

Its only groups with very low IQs that should care.

so they have a more normalized result. nothing wrong with that as long as its not below average being common

lets not focus to much on who is best . that nigger talk. lets just focus on who is worst. its a toss up between nigs and kebabs but a nig muslim is hard to top when it comes to the worst of the worst

Apparently a good bunch of lads in Sup Forums seem to contemplate East Asian women with the erroneous perception that they will provide them with intellectually superior offspring, which is a fallible logic. There's also a general concept that they are intellectually more prolific, again, a misleading interpretation.

Caucasoids are better fit for long-term survival investments. Considering miscegenation due to an erroneous view on East Asians isn't going to lead the Western society anywhere.

Asians are collectivists
Whites are individualists

of course in white culture there is much more diverse and can handle much more diversity.

When do we begin the removal?

I think it has more to do with them fudging the numbers by only using their richest cities of asian countries to gather these statistics, and when it comes to asians in white countries the majority of them are rich immigrants because it's actually not very east to immigrant legally. You need proof of how you will support yourself, job offers, take tests, all kinds of shit.

You have to remember there are different types of white racially.

If we took all german who had a pure aryan origin and used them as a separate group they would before any Asian group.

I just don't care to fight the narrative anymore, let soulless Asian fucks be intellectually superior, there is nothing we can do to stop the narrative.

Look, try to understand that with an average of 105 IQ points paired with low IQ variation does NOT provide you with the same amount of superior intellectual output within the population, this equals less technological advancement in a short period of time, although also less disparity of intelligence within said population, which is how East Asian societies currently operate.

The main focus would be improve the current intellectual output of Caucasoids through a more selective mating, this can only be achieved through extensive cultural improvements. When such an event happens within Caucasoid populations, such as the trigger caused by the black plague in Europe, it allows for a population with superior/average intelligence to flourish, while diminishing the inferior intellectual output from the equation, therefore the Age of Enlightenment.

Yes, I haven't isolated meta-ethnic groups yet, but these differences are somewhat visible, but not to a great extent. Ancient Greece was estimated to have an average IQ of 125, with an incredible amount of superior intellectual output and average intelligence, and only a small number of individuals within the inferior intellectual output population. This phenomenon can be observed throughout every Caucasoid meta-ethnic group, including Middle-Easterners and South Asians, and it's not exclusive to Germanics.

All you have to do is find yourself a smart European female. 75% of the human offsprings intellectual output comes from the X-chromosome, so think twice before knocking up a cretin, cause it's likely your sons will equally impaired as their mother.

More information on this can be found by searching about the Xq28 duplications and the female X-chromosome inactivation.

>Men impregnating mediocre women will always lead to a major intellectual decay in less than 3 generationsm, regardless of how intelligent the father might be, as most of this intellectual output is matrilinial.

I think the Japanese are probably pretty comparable with the English in intellectual genetic capability. They're like the Britain of the East. I guess Italy Korea is the other comparison (Italy being called "niggers of Europe" when they have some of the highest IQ populations and contributed a lot, and Koreans being called the same despite having a wide IQ distribution)

Chinese are super overrated.

Could you anons take the time to fill out a six question survey? It'll take two to three minutes at most. It pertains to your views when it comes to other religious faiths.

Here's the link: surveynuts.com/surveys/take?id=75274&c=1010177097TRVH

Thanks.

Visit here for discussion:

So when can we start genociding Brazilian monkeys? Gooks may be disgusting but at least they're law abiding most of the time. Brazilian monkeys breed like cockroaches and spread diseases.

You dont make much sense desu.

Without any research, can you name a single Japanese genius who greatly contributed to the improvement of making? Now how many English, Ocidental/Oriental Mediterranean, German, Iberian, Slavic geniuses can you name? Countless.

This is exactly what I mean. While Caucasoids have a lower average IQ in comparison to East Asians, our populations have much greater potential to develop superior intellectual output.

reddit.com/r/AsianMasculinity/comments/46syr3/how_to_win_geopolitical_arguments_you_will_hear/
Clearly the Asian man is superior, how can we even compete?

It has nothing to do with IQ and everything to do with faith in Jesus Christ.

This is untrue.

A possile explanation is Asians' superior mathematic/visual ability but average verbal ability.

a) whites pass the bar exam at a higher rate than Asians
b) non-STEM Asian graduates are not overrepresented

So basically, Asians fulfill the stereotype of being good at math.

Then how do you explain the absence of the East Asian Tesla, Darwin, Sir Isaac Newton, Copernicus, Gauss, Da Vinci, Mozart, Pythagoras and hundreds of other European geniuses that set a remarkable footprint in the History of mankind? It has to do with training. Jews are within the Caucasoid population and outperform both Europeans and East Asians at mathematic/spatial thinking as well as verbal IQ. This lack of training is what makes modern European populations underperform in comparison to East Asians. We have evidence to prove Europeans can perform considerably better than any other groups, and the amount of data provided by university graduates in a very recent time simply isn't enough to counter this fact.

>Now how many English, Ocidental/Oriental Mediterranean, German, Iberian, Slavic geniuses can you name? Countless.

WE

Let's talk about the myth of Brazilians being caucasian

This. Underrated comment.

Why so hung up, OP. Let me remind you Einstein was a Jew so who the fuck cares.

>Let me remind you Einstein was a Jew
einstein the stealing jew kike that worked at a patent office so he could rip off others ideas?

The real reason is that IQ means jack shit. A smart nigger is still a nigger. What we need to look at is psychological traits, like niggers having anti-social personality disorder which keeps them from building societies and whites having a kind of adventure- or wanderlust that is the reason we explore and invent so much.

the myth is based on US college stats. And we´re talking about retard murican whites who are the product of decades of libtard state education vs best asian students.

If you've ever attempted calculus you know just how autistic that nigga Newton was.

Like what the fuck am I reading?

Again: IQ doesn't matter much. Germany and Japan have the same IQ (or at least had at some point in the recent years) - who contributed more to western civilization? And Italians and Greeks rank lower on the IQ scale but invented western civilization as we know it.

Sup Forums is a bunch of weeaboo autists who rationalize their yellow fever, that's all.

>Jews are within the Caucasoid population and outperform both Europeans and East Asians at mathematic/spatial thinking as well as verbal IQ.
No. The High IQ cliche for Jews exists only since the 60s and only in America.

So either Jewish hippies unleashed the terrible powers of their shmendrik minds with LSD, or they're lying. What sounds more plausible?

>Italians and Greeks rank lower on the IQ scale but invented western civilization as we know it
>modern Italians and Greeks are equivalent to their ancestors from History

people also forget that he is racially only half jewish, so even if they were right (which they aren't) he's still part german racially

jew? lying?

christ are you some kind of nazi hans?

I actually can name one, Reiji Okazaki - molecular biologist, helped develop the modern understanding of the DNA molecule.

I used to know a few more but I forgot about them because they don't really have any significance to me. Of course the only ones I know/knew were nips so that doesn't help the Koreans any.

I find it funny how you could find time to argue about whether East Asians or Europeans have the higher potential for intellectual pursuits when your whole prevailing political philosophy on the Continent is now to introduce decidedly sub-100 IQ African and Arab races en masse.

Pro-tip: Europeans' "High Variance" advantage would mean nothing if the very genes that caused it are bred out.

>triple the projection
>triple the digits

It's all based on culture
Asians are an insectoid culture which just means that everyone works as compared to ridgid societal rules
Whites are not therefore there is a large massajority of cattle and a small percentage never over 10% of the population that are inherently smart as fuck and because they're not cattle like the majority they are scoffed at or outright ostracised

>Jews are within the Caucasoid population and outperform both Europeans and East Asians at mathematic/spatial thinking as well as verbal IQ
According to a study on jewish intelligence conducted by other jews

>This gives Caucasian populations a major advantage when it comes to technological and cultural improvements, with the downside of having greater disparity of intelligence within the population.
this does make sense in the context of chinks being around for 5,000 years, so naturally inventing rudders, bellow, gun powder etc... but never actually building upon these discoveries (...also to do with Confucianism coming to power in the mid 1400s, stagnating their progression up until now)

>>The lack of eugenic maintenance within Caucasian populations is what has led to its considerable decline, although small changes, such as the removal of unfit individuals could very easily lead these populations to a 2nd Age of Enlightenment
again, this is clearly rooted in fact -- through extremist, imprudent humanism, we've let 'lesser types' breed and breed uncontrollably - outstripping better spæcial examples by orders of magnitude (6 billion+ now project for Africa by 2100; up from 4 billion only a decade ago) - so, invariably, by letting these people flood into more advanced societies, all measures are lowered on aggregate

In calculus I encounter these names: Fourier, Lagrange, Gauss, Ostrogradsky. In probability theory I meet these ones: Markov, Buffon. And so on, and so forth. There's no one shitskin.

This has been an running as a potential explanation for some years, but I thought no study has confirmed it yet? Do you have a source?

further...

[east] asian nations are far less miscegenous that than the "culturally diverse" West, so it only follows that their IQ's would be consistent

When will this genetical IQ meme die finally?
Here is the thing, no amount of genetical superiority will save you if you are an information resistant Sup Forums-tard who has a brain structure akin to dusty shelves which do not interact with each other.
No matter what you tell yourselves all the time, there is absolutely no substantial proof for different races having severe differences in their brain through direct genetic predisposition.
There are huge amounts of reasons why someone is intellectually ahead of others which are actually proven, but none of them have genetics as an argument.
The only thing which could be arguably influencing ones brain power are genetically caused tendencies which actively prevent you from developing your brain. But those are so faint that they could be easily outmaneuvered through good conditioning.
This whole discussion is incredibly stupid, because you idiots focus on some shady genetical backgrounds instead of on obvious criterea of culture, development of educational institutions, upbringing, economical and social status, etc.

If your country brought great people into this world, you are much less member of a superior race, than a member of a superior nation and culture.

How is Louisiana that high?

races = genetic clusters

there absolutely is proof that intelligence and therefore IQ are extremely based in genetics. in fact as much as 80% of variation in g/IQ in adults is explained by parental g/IQ. children show more variation but most of that quickly disappears.

that is to say genetics are the largest factor in intelligence. of course if you have severe malnutrition and severe neglect such as not being taught language in the critical period, you can hamper your potential. but that doesn't mean if you put someone in the perfect environment they'll jump in IQ by 50 points, as delusional liberals would like to believe.

if you take a poor black kid with stupid parents and raise him in an upper class white home with intelligent parents, the IQ of his parents are by far a better indicator of his adult IQ. this has been tested, and has been tested with identical twins

therefore there is proof that races on average can have higher intelligence. so racial averages are good measuring stick for judging strangers, and judging communities considering that people of the same race naturally congregate

the only truth in your cucked post is that these averages are only an indication of what you can assume your intelligence might be. once you know your own intelligence, that's far more relevant than that of your race. and you shouldn't be proud of your race when you're actually personally stupid, and thus have you have none of the things that makes you race superior on average

Nonsense.

The reason the "West" has produced more "geniuses", is because of the freedom it affords the intellectually gifted.

The gifted are removed from society and placed in institutions where their talents are nurtured.

Geniuses can only flourish in an environment that allows them to live without fear. It is the West's culture that has propelled them ahead of "other" cultures.

reasonable b8

Money, not freedom to be pervert.

so what
I'm ok with asians being superior intellectually

stop trying to be such a stormfag

Our academics are not rich.

none of those on that graphic are "high"... they're mid-low to low... hence the meme

Nah, drop the "adventurer" bullshit. Europeans have higher aptitude for critical-analytical thinking that allows for more complex ideas to flourish. A powerful brain leading to faster processing of stimuli provided by your surrounding environment, therefore ideas, and the eventual discoveries. Western culture and influence, media, politics, language. It's neurometabolic traits affecting behavior, not the other way around.

I'm not trying to argue whether of either, I'm trying to actually prove Europeans have higher potential for intellectual pursuits. The main problem here is the 'inferior intellectual output' population I mentioned, which is higher than the 'average intellectual output' population but still not as high as the superior members. These individuals with average/below average intellectual output are the ones that comprise the majority of the population and also the ones subject to easy indoctrination. Remove the bottom feeders, keep the average and maintain those with superior intellectual output at the top and that's the recipe for an Enlightenment-tier society.

>but never actually building upon these discoveries
There, this is a very important note to consider that I had overlooked. This lack of superior intellectual output within their population is exactly what prevented them from building upon said discoveries.
>all measures are lowered on aggregate
Which is also to be considered when studying these populations: the more miscegenated they are the harder it is to pinpoint which intellectual characteristics belong to each group., therefore the lack of consistency when it comes to IQ measurements in said populations. To think of it, quite a dangerous path to be 'culturally diverse'.

Now to further contribute to your argument:
>Intellectual output of human male offspring is more directly influenced by the single X-chromosome inherited by the mother.
>Intellectual output of human female offspring is evenly distributed between the two X's, this is a result of X-Chromosome Inactivation in females (literally a genetic mosaic).

Can you give me a source or are you talking out of your ass?

Based NH

This is also why we're more intelligent than European kikes. Ashkenazi jews have higher IQ's on average, but lower in terms of outlier range. Caucasian outliers are a full standard deviation away from the nearest highest range.

>>The lack of eugenic maintenance within Caucasian populations is what has led to its considerable decline, although small changes, such as the removal of unfit individuals could very easily lead these populations to a 2nd Age of Enlightenment.

or you could just employ them as janitors and not be Hitler.

>what are college states

No, dirt poor farmers in China also score over 100.

Pic related as it shows males having wider IQ variance as a result of the lack of genetic mosaicism found in females - relying mostly on the X-chromosome. Having only 1 X-chromosome makes it considerably easier for men to have wider IQ variation: exceptionally intelligent men, but equally exceptional cretins within this same observable male population - again, most geniuses are men, and so are patients at mental asylums.
hmg.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/suppl_1/R27.full
scholar.harvard.edu/files/srichard/files/richardson_sexing_the_x.pdf?m=1374974674 (this being my favorite, very well-detailed in all aspects of this topic)

Modern Jewry derived from central Europe are currently the major contributors in every branch of science. I can't endorse the "muh nobel prize is a lie" Stormfag bullcrap when I experience this on a daily basis.

Wrong. By allowing a higher number of intellectually gifted individuals to flourish you automatically contribute to technological investment. Why janitors when you can have robots to perform this task?

Of course I can. By analyzing test samples and particularly comparing Bell Curves between these populations. IQ disparity within Caucasian populations is much greater in comparison to East Asian populations: you'll find wider gaps between Europeans than between Asians.
lagriffedulion.f2s.com/sft.htm

>major contributors

Not really. The problem here is people are looking at jewish variance. For the vast majority of human intellectual progress jews did virtually nothing. You're looking at a tiny blip of activity, which is mostly variance in the overall trend of jewish intellectual progress and you say "look at all the joos that are doing things!"

In reality even niggers have their variance years in science, relative to overall scientific contribution the recent jewish spike is quite insignificant.

Faggots that believe in IQ tests still lol,, k senpai

wtf i didnt write senpai, i wrote F A M (senpai) fukkin Sup Forums nigga

funnyjunk does the same shit, get this garbage out REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>Without any research, can you name a single Japanese genius who greatly contributed to the improvement of making? Now how many English, Ocidental/Oriental Mediterranean, German, Iberian, Slavic geniuses can you name?
Their names are rather hard to recall, you know.

You're never going to be nearly as funny as Australians, cause your brain will naturally prevent you from being creative. So your best card is to mimick Europeans in a failed attempt to be funny due to this inability to elaborate your own jokes.

The ones from long ago were noble, and the ones from today have insane funding.

>Modern Jewry derived from central Europe are currently the major contributors in every branch of science. I can't endorse the "muh nobel prize is a lie" Stormfag bullcrap when I experience this on a daily basis.
What about the nepotism?

Another stormfag pseudo-bullcrap. If you have members of a group that outperform others at given tasks, why bother hiring the latter when you know the first is going to provide you higher profit.
Same with white Brazilians who run the media and practically everything in a country with a majority mutt-black population. Or with East Asians in the United States being a preference when it comes to hiring and also earning more than their non-Asian counterparts. If there's a Jew at a financial business and only another Jew is available to perform a given task with the required aptitude, that Jew will, inevitably, hire the other Jew. If it's an Indian, he's going to pick the Indian over the Jew (which is widely seen today within the Engineering field).

You write a ton of crap and you don't even have the decency to provide a single source in the OP and the 2 subsequent posts you made. You should honestly kill yourself, even if this is true.

>also
>IQ meaning anything

You cheapen the success of Western civilization by merely attributing it to IQ. Perhaps you should read some literature on explaining why the European countries pulled so far ahead of the Asians in the last 500 years?

Not one scholarly work that I have read attributes their success to IQ.

Right which is why we need to have an in group preference to compete with Jews who would kill 100 goyim to save a chosen.

Asians have more equal societies because they share less genetical disparity, of course they got drawbacks having less geniuses.

Ashkenazi specifically the smartest jewish group actually has european roots

haaretz.com/jewish/news/.premium-1.551825
timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-descend-from-350-people-study-finds/
nytimes.com/2013/10/09/science/ashkenazi-origins-may-be-with-european-women-study-finds.html?_r=0