>Not conquering your entire landmass
Umm.... no offence but.....are you even trying sweeties?? xoxo
>Not conquering your entire landmass
Umm.... no offence but.....are you even trying sweeties?? xoxo
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Are kangaroos the final solution to the ISIS question?
Whatever man. Even we expanded where there wasn't anyone in the way.
>conquering rocks and sand
congratz johno
I know you man. I have seen you in our east slav thread.
Kangaroos are all bark and no bite and they don't even bark
the brits conquered it for you
>have not conquered their entire landmass
we were the brits
hello :^)
no you were their niggers
australia is 90% desolate wasteland user
But Australians didn't conquer it. British conquered it.
Sirieus question here.
Whom is your head of state? The crown or the governor-general?
Test
Not rangebanned. Shitpost on, friend!
> we were the brits
t. Andrew Nikerophopoulos
No one even knows
en.wikipedia.org
Neither of them actually do anything for us though, it's a symbolic title
If it's symbolic it's not that important i guess. Still curious though. How are opinions divided?
0.5%: the queen
0.5%: governor-general
99%: don't give any kind of shit
Thank you for saturating my curiousity!
we want, but then again, you god fuckin damn anglo prevent us
You're lucky France doesn't conquer your shitty moneystrip
>tfw the people who conquered it were British, not Australian
You're welcome.
Yeah but they're my ancestors and not yours
At least we don't have to share our countries with abos kek
At least we have stuff worth a shit on that land mass.
>Implying Australians aren't just Brits on a larger island
There's less than 1 million of them in existence
>>Implying Australians aren't just Brits on a larger island
This makes sense, you're both inferior to the US
Seppos aren't Anglo
wtf i love maine now