Buy doll

>buy doll
>get v&

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-40383627

>A man has been jailed for trying to import an "obscene" child-like sex doll, in what police say is the first case of its kind in the UK.
>Andrew Dobson, from Crewe, was sentenced to two years and eight months in jail and has been put on the sex offenders register for life

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/CzzDD
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Don't give bbc clicks!

archive.is/CzzDD

Do you think they have a left-wing bias or a right-wing bias?

They're center-left I think.

Yeah, it's just hilarious seeing people complain they are bias towards both sides. Kind of fits with them wanting to be down the middle

So he had cp on his computer and is only getting two years? Or is the two years for the doll and if so, what is the charge?

Every time I read anything on the UK justice system it always seems muddled and backwards and I don't know if it's shit reporting or if it's a shit justice system.

That's not right, he bought a fancy flashlight is all.

A fleshlight with pigtails is illegal then?

They're biased towards doll collectors

>He admitted importing an indecent object, possessing indecent images of children and two counts of making indecent images of children.

Never heard of the charge of importing an indecent object before. If he's only got two years then the indecent pics must be pretty mild, like taking pics of kids naked a pool or something

Read the article. Hazel Stewart, from the National Crime Agency Child Exploitation and Online Protection Specialist Operation Team, said: "Importation of the life-like dolls is a relatively new phenomenon and there is no offence of possession, only importing an obscene article

It's because of how the justice system works. It is just trying to interpret a load of different laws at once that have built up over hundred years. Plus you can't really outlaw something until it happens

2 counts for making indecent images of children. I don't think they charged him for the doll

Indecent is such a loose word, like obscene. What is obscene and indecent to one person might not be true to another

They have a left bias if you ask the right

They have a right bias if you ask the left

They have always scored very, very highly in non-bias press reviews. People who think otherwise are fucking plebs.

By the way; the only relevant part of the article:

>Following the discovery of the doll - at East Midlands Airport - searches found indecent images on his computer.

tldr, the doll led them to search his PC for CP

So importing a toy gun will also bring about a prison sentence as it's possession of illegal arms?
Importing a fleshlight will also put you in jail as it is unable to give consent and it's therefore rape?

A crime no longer needs a victim?

They generally offend both sides of the political spectrum so in that sense it seems to be balanced.

Someone cant read. He got jailed for importing an obscene object and having child porn

>jailed for importing an obscene object
Who is the victim in that crime though?

I don't get it...
It's not a real child/person. If a weirdo wants to fuck a plastic toy then why not, or have we come to #PlasticDollsMatter

This guy lives on the road next to me

Maybe you should ask if he needs someone to hold onto his doll while he's in prison

Perhaps I should

thought about importing one myself, guess i'll have a bit of a re-think, or if the offence was importing but not possesion maybe I should start manufacturing the little fekkers.

No obscenity laws ever had victims. Its not a new thing

>So he had cp on his computer and is only getting two years?

how is it only? two years for having pictures on a computer is a lot

Depends how bad the images are. Plus he admitted making pictures aswell