Just your daily reminder fahrenheit 451 is becoming reality and google/youtube is the owner of your definitions and...

Just your daily reminder fahrenheit 451 is becoming reality and google/youtube is the owner of your definitions and minds

right wing - the conservative or reactionary section of a political party or system.

fascism - an authoritarian nationalistic conservative or reactionary section of a political party or system of government and social organization.

happy now

Left-wing fascism is called Communism

Fascism is not inherently conservative or reactionary

There is more to politics than what you learn in school

communism does not belong to any specific Wing that's like saying capitalism belongs to a specific wing

communism capitalism and socialism are just systems of government economy workings

fascism is inherently right-wing because it is reactionary

>systems of government economy workings
Can you revise that or put some fucking punctuation in there so I know what the fuck you're talking about?

Opinions are always trying to be controlled by msm, but who tries the hardest to remove other sides pov's?

Left. They hate freedom of speech while right wingers (at least in america) just kinda view them as a joke and let them carry on.

No

You're right. People are becoming uneducated and losing their sense of right and wrong, all traces of anything else has been erased or dumped in the "memory hole". People do not care about others, only their selves. It's disappointing. If I have any hope in the world, it would come from converting to a system of government that used to exist, that didn't collapse on itself.

Any ideas on which government systems didn't collapse on itself or had to be discontinued because of losing wars?

This is just for you because you obviously need the help.

Communism, socialism, and capitalism are not systems of government. They are instead systems of economy which belong to government. A communist system can act under a right wing government, as a socialist system can act under a left-wing government, and so on and so on.

>left-right is the reactionary dimension

Sure nigger. Btw I have some shares of a mine on mars to sell you, only 10k per share.

the opposite of fascism or a left-wing fascism would be a highly liberal personal freedoms focused government which is anti-national and more focus on a world government that sees progression as its main motivator

To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven.

Them ancient Jews knew, nothing lasts forever, not even cold November rain.

your train of thought should end there is no government system which works 100% of the time all government systems that are created work but the question is how long will they work the answer lies within the people and location of said government some governments last month's others last year's and even more will last a century or two but no government will last forever no government will truly break a thousand years so the best government you could come up with is one that is able to adapt and change Through Time so that it is flexible but in the end as it changes it will no longer be the same government it started off as

you have no idea what I mean by reactionary. you assume it to be some sort of insult.

your statement show how you're trapped in your bubble

There are a lot of systems that work at the time they are needed, but the system of government would have to change over time depending on the problem(s) at hand.

So you are right

wait a minute did I just convince somebody on the internet of something and they didn't respond by cursing at me it must be the end of the world

>calls right reactionary by definition
>'you don't know what i mean'

No assumptions here. I infer you are confused, or perhaps dumb, but I assume nothing.

You throw insults because you don't understand, it's okay I will try and help you understand.

Reactionary - (of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.

You see conservatives exist by nature to promote the conservation of how things are. This is not to say that they are against innovation, it is to say that they are against who forms of ideology.

>new forms of ideology.

As i said, probably confused. Copying some random definition does not help and your own sentence doesn't even make sense, they are against who forms of ideology indeed.

Let me try to remove some of the confusion. Firstly you conflate reactionary and conservative. Secondly you conflate reactionary and conservative with left and right. Finally you apply this confused mess to a historical movement mainly known for its emphasis of the people over the individual and argue it means they are "right". GIGO.

...

>Copying some random definition does not help and your own sentence doesn't even make sense
These definitions are not random, without clearly defined words we can't have this conversation. If you think the definitions I have are wrong speak up, and then we will both know that there can be no transmission of ideas here.

>Firstly you conflate reactionary and conservative
That is close to what I am doing but not quite. I'm not saying reactionary and conservative are the same thing I'm saying that one is a symptom of the other at times. To be reactionary is more than just the definition I have listed for you. It is to act in response, and in the terms of conservative ideology. It is often a response to liberal ideology.

>you conflate reactionary and conservative with left and right
Again you are somewhat correct here, but you have a few things mixed up. I am saying by nature conservatives are right wing, but this does not mean left-wingers can't be conservative to, and vice versa. I am merely trying to express to you that being a right winger, and being conservative often goes hand-in-hand. But one maybe a left wing conservative, or a right-wing liberal. These are not impossibilities they are just uncommon

My argument is still as followed.
Conservatives by the nature of their politics are often reactionary.

See examples of gay marriage, gun rights, and segregation.