How come IQ doesn't matter when something like the bell curve is brought up...

How come IQ doesn't matter when something like the bell curve is brought up, but then it suddenly matters when making fun of the "poorly educated low IQ Trump supporters"?

Other urls found in this thread:

economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/04/daily-chart-14
ipad-ebooks-online.com/150/OEBPS/part15.html
books.google.ca/books?id=5m23RrMeLt4C&pg=PT388
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Oh it does matter. It's just not never any minority's fault, if they perform less than adequately.

the irony is that most of these people who claim to be smart for not supporting a candidate have a average IQ same with Trump suporters

You want low IQ go visit Haiti

>How come IQ doesn't matter when something like the bell curve is brought up, but then it suddenly matters when making fun of the "poorly educated low IQ Trump supporters"?

because each supporter of an ideology wants his opponents to be seen as dumb rather than using scientific evidence in order to make a point.

>smug leftist thinks he has a high IQ
>High IQ correlates to being superior
im not sure they want to take that position

Actually, Trump supports are more intelligent, highly educated, and earn more than the supporters of other candidates. Next.

economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/04/daily-chart-14

because your IQ is high enough to detect this hypocrisy and theirs isn't

>six million years in paint

don't you know? statistics only matter when they are beneficial to your cause

>don't you know? statistics only matter when they are beneficial to your cause
What statistics? The left just call you low IQ and then when you ask them for source they just start chanting that you or the person you support is racist/nazist/fascist etc.

-Democrats
>We care about the poor
>Why vote Trump when Democrat policies benefit you
>Poor people are usually uneducated
>Uneducated people are called dumb nowadays

hahahahahahha Fuck off you Finnish meme lord cunt, go prep your bull with Sweden.

le fixed :^)

>IQ means education
MORTY IT'S ALL BULLSHIT. IT'S ALL BULLSHIT MORTY. HALF THE TEACHERS DON'T LIKE STUDYING THE THINGS THEY TEACH.

FUCK SCHOOL, READ BOOKS.

>Over ten years I have asked more than a thousand undergraduates and several hundred nonstudents their beliefs about what kind of adults, by educational level, supported the war in Vietnam.
>By an overwhelming margin-almost 10 to I -audiences believe that college-educated persons were more dovish.

>Most people feel that schooling is a good thing and enables us to sift facts, weigh evidence, and think rationally. An educated people has been said to be a bulwark of democracy.
>However, the truth is quite different. Educated people disproportionately supported the Vietnam War.
>Throughout our long involvement in Southeast Asia, on issues related to Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia, or Laos, the grade schooleducated were always the most dovish, the college-educated the most hawkish.

ipad-ebooks-online.com/150/OEBPS/part15.html
books.google.ca/books?id=5m23RrMeLt4C&pg=PT388

cognitive dissonance

>When my audiences learn that educated people were more hawkish, they scurry about concocting new explanations. Since they are still locked into their presumption that educated people are more intelligent and have more good will than the less educated, their theories have to strain to explain why less-educated Americans were right.

>Sociologists have long agreed that schools are important socializing agents in our society.
>Education as socialization tells people what to think and how to act and requires them to conform.
>Socialist leaders such as Fidel Castro and Mao Tse-tung vastly extended schooling in Cuba and China in part because they knew that an educated people is a socialized populace and a bulwark of allegiance. Education works the same way here: it encourages students not to think about society but merely to trust that it is good.

They only go for things that benefit them, they are agressive at factual evidence and will shelter themselves from reality by denying everything without a proper reason instead of seeing the actual idea, finding something that properly counter-arguments that is not an experience that happened once in their lives.

Very subtle nice

>IQ too high to support Trump
>voted for Hilary to win the democratic primary

The irony...

Liberals are hypocrites, halt the presses

TOP KEK