Why isn't jet fuel considered one of the most dangerous substances on earth...

Why isn't jet fuel considered one of the most dangerous substances on earth, taking into account the damage it singlehandedly caused on September 11th?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/3PLmGPeLsJY
sciencealert.com/engineers-are-putting-out-fires-with-explosives
whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_1975_fire.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>jet fuel is considered non-dangerous

>degree in civil engineering

>Jet fuel explodes in fireball on impact
>No more jet fuel for fires
>Jet fuel can't melt steal beams
>Because there is no jet fuel left

Shhh you will blow his mind. He can't comprehend jet fuel burns away instantly... He has no free thought process. The office printer paper supply melted steel beams lekz

Right?

Only an idiot would watch a plane crash into a building, burn for hours, then collapse and says there must be something else that caused the collapse.

>one of the most flammable substances on earth
>it is considered dangerous

also, Alex Jones already debunked the jet fuel thing. the sandy hook actors did 11/9/01

>burn for hours
>56 min
>1 hour 42 min
Neither burnt for hours faggot

Well, all tall buildings have load of alumiunum, and jet fuel burns hot enought to start aluminium fire... and burning aluminium can melt steel.
And another fact is, that you dont have to reach melting temperature, high temperatures will make metals softer, and soft metals will bend!
Jet fuel was not the onlydangerous thing in that building, it is more like chain reaction.

...

9/11 was a bullshit lie meant to bring about endless war, which is what we have now.

Why do you accept the lie?

You fucking idiots, it WASN'T the jet fuel, it was the chem-trail substance.

One of the dumbest posts I've ever read.

Are your retarded? There was no jet fuel to melt anything
See

>being this ignorant

...

You idiots do know that explosions start fires?

youtu.be/3PLmGPeLsJY

So? They can also put them out
sciencealert.com/engineers-are-putting-out-fires-with-explosives
The fact remains there was no jet fuel to melt anything.

So all you are left with is an office fire just like 1975
whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_1975_fire.html

Stop being retarded

...

>IMPLYING

Why the fuck is the building smoking idiot, when there is no fire?
Damn you retarded idiots, i'm out,

this is some bad bait, but it c;early got the bites you were looking for. Good for you op. Make your mam proud.

>11/9/01
sly bait there or unapologetically british

I just proved that office fires aren't enough to cause the sagging trusses nist claims as proven by the 1975 fire

There was no jet fuel after impact .what do you think those giant fireballs were made of ?

So I have established that office fires can't make the trusses sag
That there was no jet fuel
And according to nist the planes were not the reason the towers fell

Are you really this stupid?