OFFICIAL COMMUNIST LEADER POWER RANKINGS

1. Fidel Castro
2. Josip Broz Tito
3. Vladimir Lenin
4. Mao Zedong
5. Janos Kadar
6. Josef Stalin
7. Ho Chi Minh
8. Todor Zhivkov
9. Enver Hoxha (First Half)
.
.
.
.
9001. Nicolae Ceausescu
9002. Enver Hoxha (2nd Half)
9003. Mengistu Haile Mariam
9004. Pol Pot
9005. Kim Il Sung

>Kádár above Stalin
>anyone above Stalin

>Pol Pot not top 5
Garbage list, you sh-
>Trotsky not listed
Nevermind, ya did good OP

>le castro XDXD

kys Reddit. He ain't even top 5

... but which ones were successful communities tho

Castro played baseball so this is 100% Sup Forums material

none of these guys were straight up marxists. they all either started off as or devolved into stalinism-type totalitarian/authoritarianism

not sports

>I rate Minh

member when list threads didn't get deleted

i hate nu/sp/ so fucking much REEEEE

>Tito not first
Trash list

>Tito not eneteranl god-emperor
You had one job!

Literally this.

>no Bernie Sanders

>list threads
Nigga you finna catch these hands.

This

I want reddit to leave

>no based Salvador Allende

This.

Fucking fachos reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

>rating Castro

Fuck, I forgot South Americans

>mao not first
>only one who's success stretches into the modern era and literally encompasses a 6th of the world

Well, by that metric it might as well be Lenin

>muh no-true-marxist

Like clockwork

Lenin was shit-tier.

Stalin spent years cleaning up after Lenin's mess.

Friendly reminder: there has only ever been one truly successful marxist revolution (Somalia, LMAO).

>mentioning salvador allende

Interestive thred

mao may have won the civil war and united the country, but that was it. fucked everything else up after and it took deng to fix his mess.

>____ may have won the civil war and united the country, but that was it. fucked everything else up after and it took ____ to fix his mess.

Wow, that literally every Marxist ever, and shockingly, the (((fix))) after the revolution is often just as bad, if not worse.

t. Sup Forumstard that desperately wants a revolutionary race war

>be a literal who
>claim communism
>rise in popularity
>gain power
>ignore communist ideals

what do they mean by this?

>Asian league

Come on Stalin had way more competition in Europe, and Gulags' construction was maybe the best move ever, hilarious and efficient at the same time

t. a fucking leaf

dude leaf lmao

...

>9005. Kim Il Sung
>the leader of the only country which THEY couldn't infiltrate that low

I wonder ( ( ( who ) ) ) could be behind this post.

Do you know what the Top 10 has in common? Theyre all better than Hitler

Fuck off, commie scum.

communism would have saved all of your favelas and everyone that lives inside of it and you know this man

...

Don't talk about my country if you don't know shit about it.

apex jej

Its a shithole riddled with inequality poverty corruption and crime. You could use a Fidel

>no Corbyn

>it's a "I took a semester of 20th century history and now my eyes are open" thread

I love these to be honest family

Who /labor/ here

Is he winning the next general election?

No. He's leading Labour off a cliff. After the next general election, Labour will probably be the 4th biggest party in the UK after the Torys, the LibDems and the SNP. Maybe even 5th behind UKIP. They have a huge by-election coming up in Stoke which they desperately need to win. It says everything about Corbyn that even when he's up against someone like May who's a bit of an amateur, he can't even make up little ground. The other day he suggested we should have a pay cap. The man is mental.

Hasn't labor in the UK been a steaming pile of shit the whole 21st century

how are they going to win anything?

It wouldn't be any different from what we have now.
If you think there's no inequality, poverty and corruption in Cuba, then you've been reading fake news and been duped your entire life

>Hasn't labor in the UK been a steaming pile of shit the whole 21st century

Not really. Blair won 3 back-to-back general elections, one of which was after Iraq, which is an achievement. But he was more of a centralist and a big part of why the party is dying now. It was him that began the great immigration surge into the country - over 300k (net) every year. Labour's stance on immigration makes them unelectable. They appeal to virtually no one.

1. Lenin
2. Stalin
3. Hoxha
.
.
.
90000. Castro (revisionist)
90001. Mao (revisionist)
90002. Tito (revisionist)
90003. Ceausescu (revisionist)
90004. Pol Pot (revisionist)

etc.

>I rate Stalin

Also where do you think Mélenchon will rank once he's elected?

Just a reminder that communism doesn't exist. There are only a bunch of ideas for economic and social standards which are packed into one big boogeyman labeled "Communist" to ensure you accept a misantropic consumerism society which allows to rule a few over masses by using stimulated needs.

...