Alright Sup Forums, so I found a disturbing YouTube channel called 'Hunter in the Gym'. The disturbing thing about this channel is that it's content consists mainly of a young girl doing gymnastics. While it may seem innocent, I can't help but think this is pretty fucked up.
So is YouTube really being used as some kind of 'pedophile ring'? Does anyone know anything about this?
Other urls found in this thread:
post a link to 1 of the videos or I call bullshit
like dance moms without the crack
too young
it's girls doing gymnastics, nothing to see here
yeah, they have a huge audience because pedos, but who really gives a fuck
what's "worse" are massage instruction videos, but again this is nothing new nor is there any problem with this
the only problems i see is with parents not supervising the comment section and keeping it clean of filth so the girls only get a confidence boost out of it rather than being scared off from staying healthy and fit
If you're disturbed our outrated now, I wonder what you'd think if you went past the tip of the iceberg.
I have a list of over 300 youtube profiles that each openly showcase 100s-1000s of videos of children. These videos aren't just gymnastics, but anything that might be perceived in a sexual light - bikinis, underwear, nudity, twerking, etc
I found these users through youtube comments, and so I can tell you that about 30% of pedophiles who comment on youtube openly showcase this material. About 20% try to directly communicate with the children in the videos. The vast majority are comments like "sexy girl" and "I wanna stick me cock in her"
Post em
There are other problems. For instance, differences in culture. In many places preteen girls don't wear tops and wearing nothing but underwear is common. They don't expect to be bombarded with sexual comments when they post videos that show this. Even the parents are surprised. Worse still is when the parents are involved. These videos can be monetized with ads, so parents are then incentivized to post videos of their children. I will agree with you though, the vast majority of videos are innocent, and the fault lies with the parents.
Or perhaps the fault lies with the pedos? After all, these guys sexualize children playing in playgrounds. A child at play is ot a sexual being, just a child at play. Should parents be blamed because some ass can't keep his dick jnder control?
oy vey shlomo, goyim know we're behind it!
I don't trust this sites anonymity and I choose to not be linked with said profiles. That said, they aren't hard to find. Search for playlists of little girls on youtube, go to the comments, view the profiles of obvious profiles, and check their videos/playlists to repeat the process.
I don't think fault belongs on the shoulders of just one group. When there are parents selling videos of their children for people to jerk off to, there's certainly blame on both the producer and consumers. That said, you can't generalize about parents or pedophiles. Most parents are just oblivious, not committing a crime of exploitation. Most pedophiles are just jacking off to a fantasy that they can't help enjoying, and they will never act past that. It's when pedophiles start interacting with the children, or leaving sexual comments for them, that I see a problem.
Exactly, it's the pedos who act out in ways which interfere with children to whom I was referring. I'm a pedo, but have never harmed a child nor so much as said anything sexually suggestive to one. I don't buy pedo porn nor do I trade it with anyone nor collect it, so I don't promote that sort of abuse. I have a sense of responsibility to children, not to mess them up. But some pedos don't actually respect children, and those ones are the problem.
now post your fav cheese pics
Well met Sup Forumsrother.
Oh, OP you have no idea how many "pedophile" channels are on youtube.
Channels that have pedophilie intentions disguise their videos in the youtube kids section.
They do it by naming their videos something kid friendly like "baby elsa chases joker" or " kid eats 10 inch long gummy worm" but it's all part of a sick fetish. They have all kind of fetishes like scat, domination, shaming, ect.
Heck, some channels show videos of under age kids in "skimpy" clothing or twerking and then give it a strange title (example, "webcam 2-7-12") The title MAY seem strange to us, but it's intentionally made to be hard to find so only the people looking for it would find that kind of sick content.
Just don't look to far into it, there's some REALLY dodgy stuff. Not to mention channels that have the youtuber be a pedophile and ask kid fans for nudes or endorse pedophilia.... Truly disgusting.
...
...
sadly it'll become suddenly mainstream when some media will get the order to explain the Muh New Scandal Pedos Blah Blah
There are at least a few mainstream journalists who are using Sup Forums content to boost their careers, reporting on internet trends based on stuff found here. It weirded me out bigtime first time I heard this place mentioned on the CBC.
>comes to Sup Forums outraged by pedo videos on utube.
>not realizing he just contributed pizza to pedos
Good job OP, you official became part of the problem
just give one example video so i know if this is worth it