JUST

...annnnnd thats a career, gals.

After a retard amount of shilling for their first album, these industry plants are now cooked.

Youll never hear about them again

Other urls found in this thread:

pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/21469-we-are-king/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I don't care.

Reply to this post if you feel the same way.

...

...

>73787564

If you didnt care you wouldnt have clicked this thread and responded it you faggot

Columbia is saving up for their Arcade Fire and Tyler, the Creator BNM's.

7.8 out of 10 is good though
above average

That I can do

That's a good rating.

Not really, you fucking retard. I care about this board so I care about the content on it. I'm not going to ignore it if someone's dog shits on my lawn but that doesn't mean I'm interested in dogshit now.

>I care about this board
Kill yourself. If you cared you'd make good threads and not let it turn to garbage

hmmm

...

>If you cared you'd make good threads and not let it turn to garbage
except I do. I have three threads up with 100+ replies so far. You can stop projecting anytime, user.

I like a lot of it, but goddamn if I want a straight up live version of the album. A lot gets lost in the normie-appealing overproduction.

The title track is fucking spectacular.

they waited too fucking long
it's been what, 5 years since their debut?
that's an eternity for a buzzband

Is not bnm at leat

8.8 BNM if they were three strong black women tbqh

>7.8
the conceit of this thread is retarded. saged.

lol if 3 black women made the exact same album nothing changed but they are black this would've got 9.6 AOTY

...

...

there you go

pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/21469-we-are-king/

>still playing the victim game

Replied and retweeted this because I can't totaly relate

...

...

reply

...

Who?

>pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/21469-we-are-king/
this actually reinforces my point. if KING were white this album would have got a 6.0 or more likely, never have been reviewed

...

Ugly bands general?

This is the p4k scale my newfriend, anything not "BNM" is pretty much panned

This is unironically true

I just hate joos

why do white people have such a victim complex?

...

>7.8
>bad

Literally only 2 albums have reached 7.5 in my ratings this year

>what are different rating scales

bye bye HAIM

Mega link?

>3 ugly jewesses
Why would I even listen to them in the first place

t. pol user

The emphasis is on ugly, but you can keep knee jerking, sperg

...

just a reminder that nigger :D

WE WUZ

no fuck u and ur meme

>major label artist
>industry shill
this meme has lost all meaning.
guys have you heard that uhh imagine dragons are industry shills? also marvel movies and the big bang theory

>The emphasis is on ugly
yeah you typed jewesses by accident. you hit the "jewesses" key in between O and P

>pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/21469-we-are-king/

user what's it like being such a timid pussy?
Why do you feel so inferior?

Were they even relevant before?

Who cares, all that matters is if their music is good.

>Reply to this post if you feel the same way.
Literally the Sup Forums equivalent of upvoting. Fucking kill yourself.

But they aren't good

KANGZ

...

I'm just tired of people saying bands are "irrelevant". Fuck relevant music. Relevant music usually sucks. I'd rather just talk about what is good and what is bad.

I agree. I've been seeing a lot of people dismissing Jay-Z's new album saying he "isn't relevant anymore". I mean, I actually didn't really like it either, but using relevance as an argument is ridiculous

...

i heard a rumor that artists on big labels are funded by their label

Unironically this, unless you get the fantano nod.

is this corey haims new band

Awful album, and I thought their first one was actually fairly enjoyable. I really don't get why this sounds so cluttered.