Ask a bipolar magical girl anything!
>no timestamp, no pics, no bully
Ask a bipolar magical girl anything!
>no timestamp, no pics, no bully
tits or gtfo
>no pics
Can't you read even op?
tits or gtfo
A real narcissist would show her tits. You're a fraud
It's not like you can see magical girls everyday so how about you enjoy conversations with me instead of doing something you always can do here
tits or gtfo
I'm not
do we pull the lever or no tho. if infinity people die but they die slower that seems better hmm.
You can ask other sluts here so if that's what you want just leave
I don't know anything about that pic, what is this supposed to mean?
schizotypal people gtfo
Who's schizophrenic here?
schizotypal, not schizophrenic
What's the difference?
Tits with timestamp or gtfo
difficult to accurately describe it in short but you could say schizophrenics have periods where they completely lose touch with reality and schizotypals have some schizophrenic-like symptoms but maintain at least some connection to reality.
Magical girls are not for dirty use, sorry
Then which am I?
if you're OP and you describe yourself as bipolar+magical then probably just schizotypal, but making diagnoses over the internet is in most cases retarded
Indeed, maybe you are smart?
>I don't know anything about that pic, what is this supposed to mean?
In maths one can "prove" that 1+2+3+4... = -1/12
Does that mean that weird math could be applied in some field related to physics, or rather real life?
how tf is that possible?
Top track. It takes an infinitely long time to become -1/2, and so top track kills less people in a given time leaving more people to live out the rest of their lives tied to a track.
Wrong.
The top track kills infinite people. The bottom track kills -1/12 people.
>>no timestamp, no pics
So GTFO already.
Only after infinite time, which is impossible as infinite people would die of old age before the train even got to them
no you stupid nigger the infinite series 1+1+1+... can be written as the sum from 1 to infinity of 1 because 1 = 1/1 = 1/x^0 for any real x which is just riemann zeta evaluated at 0 which by analytic continuation gives you -1/2 which is less than -1/12 so unless your goal was to kill more people you would choose the top path idiot
calm down /sci/
Love the pic.
Also bipolar and an also a math nerd (Fulbright Scholar in Statistics). Do you avoid taking meds because you find that your manic periods are the most productive 12-48 hours of your life? I ask because 90% of my thesis and published work was written while on a bipolar high, and it's far and away the best work I've ever done. Nothing I ever do while medicated comes close.
You are not special. You are not magical. Tits please.
mah nigga
best to have 1+2+4+8+... people on the track tho
>keeps adding larger and larger positive numbers
>somehow it ends up negatine
yeah, no
tits or gtfo
how many dicks do you suck in a week
thanks user, you are a true hero
woah a stats guy
okay i have an idea and im not a stats guy but hear me out
you know how with information geometry basically everything takes place on a riemannian manifold?
i was thinking that this should readily generalize to schemes or maybe even higher structures to allow us to use some of the more powerful tools in algebraic geometry in statistics
is there any good notion of statistics over higher geometric structures (beyond riemannian manifolds?)
tits or get the fuck out
you mean zeta(2)?
zeta(2) is positive, you'll end up killing a piece of a person
with zeta(0) you save a half of a life