Who are some artists who actively and deliberated attempted to destroy music?
Who are some artists who actively and deliberated attempted to destroy music?
Ayden Evans
Other urls found in this thread:
rateyourmusic.com
rateyourmusic.com
rateyourmusic.com
rateyourmusic.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Alexander Cox
GG Allin, Harry Pussy, Hanatarsh... The list goes on...
Levi Nguyen
Arguably the first.
Lucas Phillips
Nah. His music was actually intended to elicit emotion and be interpreted. Schoenberg is just completely bullshit anti-music.
Jace Carter
Good thing there's nothing wrong with destroying music.
Aiden Johnson
>ruins everything for everyone
Mason Peterson
Not just music, but the entirety of western civilization. (((Schoenberg))) was the soundtrack to the frankfurt school.
Carson Perry
From this point onwards, Jazz was ruined forever.
Kevin Jenkins
>attempted to destroy music
Was he well and truly, I dare ask it, /ourjew/?
Juan Brooks
>not Jaco
Ok.
Jack Gomez
Why? Should've classical music never progressed from the baroque period? And jazz didn't automatically become free jazz for the rest of time after Ornette Coleman. Just some examples of very listenable free jazz:
rateyourmusic.com
rateyourmusic.com
rateyourmusic.com
rateyourmusic.com
Owen Cook
putting music under uncompromising sovereignity of poetry and drama leads to destruction of music as higher synthetic organism.
Asher Morales
also without wagner there would be no schoenberg
Ayden Thomas
b8 thread?
Ryder Taylor
...
Jose Cook
...
Jackson Wright
If you actually read any of the stuff Schoenberg wrote you could see that he was trying to advance "German music" so that it would retain its lead over other cultures (his music would ensure it would be "100 years ahead of any other culture"), so according to himself, it's anything but anti-music. That it's a completely misguided attempt driven by some ridiculous nationalism is another matter. Russolo also justified his ideas as simply catering to the more intense, industrialized nature of the modern world, but I think it's closer to an attempt to destroy music as we know it than Schoenberg.
t. music history major
Cameron Gray
Schoenberg wanted to continue to write in the old style though. He urged his students to learn counterpoint and romantic harmony before going anywhere near 12 tone music.
Wagner started the whole shebang with the tristan chord, after which Richard Strauss was the guy who pushed music over the edge with Elektra (although he pulled back and never went that far out again).
Schoenberg was left to try to work out a system to work in that was outside of traditional tonality and he succeeded with his 12 tone system (and a bunch of other systems he came up with). Without Schoenberg we wouldn't have Webern or Berg.
Schoenberg was a reluctant revolutionary, but in no way did he ever attempt to destroy music. If you listen to his music you will find it full of gesture, emotion, color and life - just like any music. The only difference is he isn't writing inside the "rules".
I thought you Sup Forums pop fags hated rules and music theory anyway, shouldn't you love Schoenberg because he did what he felt he had to do?
youtube.com
Watch this and educate yourself:
youtube.com
If you want something to blame for trying to destroy music, blame the popular music industry - shitting out disposable singles and albums for cash and promoting sex appeal rather than musical value.
Hudson Cooper
...
Henry Rivera
Why did you even bother posting? And how is it a strawman exactly?
Nathaniel Hernandez
He was renewing Germanic music culture. Not destroying it.
lol what
ok this is a b8 thread I'm done
Alexander Watson
Because you created an argument based on what someone posted. No one said music should have stayed in the baroque period yet you assumed that was their argument.
Cooper Watson
He certainly fucked it up by making it all political and all about virtue signalling.
Easton Harris
so called creative destruction in the name of (tactical) patriotism or idealism is still destruction. in the case of adorno who heavily promoted schönberg, it didnt even need to be renewal, because he believed that destruction alone could be liberating.
>muh liberation
it keeps happening
at least with wagner there was a plausible argument about fertile effect of his new principles/aesthetics and he had works that were occasionally beautiful.
Parker Hill
>Because you created an argument based on what someone posted.
Uh, like I should have?
No one said music should have stayed in the baroque period yet you assumed that was their argument.
Doesn't that mean not progressing? And by that, Schoenberg and Webern would be considered the destroyers of music. In your opinion they most likely are and I would like to know why.
Aaron Morgan
...
Connor Sullivan
Christ are you actually 15?
Lincoln James
Oh, so you're not going to answer? Thanks for confirming this is a bait thread.