Who do i vote for?

Who do i vote for?

Other urls found in this thread:

100positivepolicies.org.au/
ausparty.org.au/page/attachment/36/asylum-seekers-and-border-protection
ausparty.org.au/page/attachment/43/first-australians
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Unless you're a multinational corporation, vote Labour always.

>voting for more shitskins

People throw around the term "Conservative in name only" but that's literally what Turnbull is. idgaf, vote meme

Daily reminder that hardline border protection policy is not the same thing as hardline immigration policy. Population growth is bipartisan.

It'll be fast and yellow regardless, but under Labor it'll be faster and yellower

Ok, but who is literally the worst of the two?

I dont much like turnbull, this is why im asking, should i literally preference labour above liberal?

Should i be happy if turnbull loses?

Dont give me meme answers

Liberals are once again the lessor of two evils

>voting labor
>ever

Are these the remainder of the cucks who used to post on the Bernie generals?

For the HoR, there is no choice other than Liberal. As for senate, be very careful who you vote for. Small parties which have traditionally preferenced Liberal is now doing so for Labor. A good example of this is Family First. They've now decided getting elected is more important than their key policies like anti-gay marriage.

Of the two major parties, foreign policy is perhaps marginally better on the Liberals side, but this is up for debate.
As for fiscal and domestic social policy, Liberal is leading the charge.
Unless environment policy and foreign policy (especially foreign spending) are really important to you, I can't see why you'd choose Labor over Liberal.

More shitskins, more money to people who refuse to work.
Fuck that.

Labor is for the poor
Liberal is for the rich
As a middle class I get fucked either way.
And greens are for wasting as much money as possible.

The one with the more red pilled values, you fucking dumb Fuck

Labour. Always Labour. Liberals sell everything to the kikes. Greens will have you on the dole living in a tent

No. You dumb shit. Labour got you into this shit in the first place

> They still sing solidarity forever
Nope

"Lesser of two evil$" for twenty fucking years. Not saying my country is any better but that's the wrong mentality

Neither.

Libs want to sell everything like kikes.

Labour want to spend all the money on cuck initiaties and refugees. Only good thing they ever did was the NBN.

>And greens are for wasting as much money as possible
kek

>Labor is for the poor
>Liberal is for the rich
>As a middle class I get fucked either way.
desu I'd like to discuss this point.
Now, without sounding like a kike banker, I'd say that it benefits the nation as a whole to help the rich rather than to help the poor.
I am not saying to only help the rich, or that helping the rich is the best and only option. But rather out of the two, I believe that helping the top 20% of our nation will help bring our bottom 80% up. It's the top 20% that is investing. They're the ones starting, operating and running businesses and market places.
Say we hurt them so that we can all give the bottom 33% an extra $55 a week, sure, that's great. But that extra $55 isn't going to make them rich enough to create new opportunities, to invest in business, to invest in infrastructure.

pls don't reply with
>hurr jewish capitalist detected
try and have a proper discussion for once and prove the seppos wrong about Australia.

>Liberals sell everything to the kikes
>Libs want to sell everything like kikes.

>posting from your computer then posting from your phone

wew lad

What the fuck Yank? Debt started when Howard was treasurer,Labor added it to then Howard added again and then sold the country.

> 2016
> Believing the govment can build internet

Can't they both lose?

You're right bro. Australia never posted a single deficit before Howard was Treasurer

...

whats your point? so howard didn't sell the country in the 90s and blamed labour?

This isn't our thread, you bloody prick m80 m8

The point is that you're talking out of your ass

Don't vote for left, the left is the most destructive force in this planet.

Only one answer:

RIGHT
>WING
MEME
>PARTIES

>that picture
>literally shitposting

Also, here you, enjoy the graph

Nope. Either one or the other. The next biggest party is Greens, and we all know they won't get more than 2 or 3 seats if the absolute best case scenario goes their way.

I usually vote Labor, although the split of Australia's left parties with Labor and the Greens means that it is harder for Labor to get into power, it does mean however that the Labor party is able to focus on traditional leftist concerns such as workers rights while the Greens party is the party of choice for the progressive left/SJW types who are more concerned with the environment and identity politics.

If that is all your going to say fuck off to redd1t

He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby become a monster. And if thou post long with the shitposter, the shit will also post into thee.

Well I could point of that privatisation begun under Labor, but it's really just not worth it with the likes of you

>Howard
Sold 70+ Billion in Assets and the Gold Reserves
Mining Boom
>Rudd
GFC.

A vote for Labor is a vote to DOUBLE the amount of Apex gang members and Muslim terrorists let into Australia as refugees

Shorten wants to let in 30,000 Apex members and Jihadists EVERY YEAR

And that's not included the tens of thousands more that will flood in via boats when Labor puss out of turning back the boats like we all know they will (and like all their backbenchers are saying they'll do)

Mate, I know he started it with the personal attacks, but don't stoop to his level

Mate, we point out that you haven't got anything to back up your claims, and now you personally attack him for questioning your falsified claims?

Can you please

Your young as fuck and have no idea what your talking about.

Countries continue to sell off assets once they're developed to build new assets. It's a continual circle.

hahaha. because we developed a new bank? no they sold assets and also revenue streams. genius

>call a double-dissolution on union busting and likely soon to be workchoices
>economy going to shit
>voting liberal party

Any cunt who votes tory should just give themselves a fucking uppercut.

read Economic cycles are just that. They're cyclical. Yes there are booms, and then there are contractions of the economy, and then once we're conservative enough, we expand again, then we over stretch, then we contract again and so on.
What's more important in determining the ability is their fiscal policy. For example, with those good times under the Howard government, things we're saved (or invested. Which arguably is better than saving when done correctly). Under the previous Labor government, we saw gross overspending. Now, let's not get confused about this. The previous Labor government wasn't just in for a year or two. They were in for much longer. They knew what they were doing. They knew how much they borrowed, how much they earned, and how much they spent.
They blew it.

right.

Fuck off dickhead, it's the fucking libs who will be importing a flood of shitskins once they get their "productivity reforms" through.

The current government has doubled the deficit. Labor saved the economy with their spending, what have the liberals done?

Vote Labor you fuckwits.

LABOR HASN'T DELIVERED A BUDGET SURPLUS SINCE 1989

>LABOR HASN'T DELIVERED A BUDGET SURPLUS SINCE 1989

LABOR HASN'T DELIVERED A BUDGET SURPLUS SINCE 1989

>LABOR HASN'T DELIVERED A BUDGET SURPLUS SINCE 1989

LABOR HASN'T DELIVERED A BUDGET SURPLUS SINCE 1989

>LABOR HASN'T DELIVERED A BUDGET SURPLUS SINCE 1989

Once a budget goes into deficit, Labor has no ability to cut spending to go back into surplus. They are no concerned about "muh programs" to EVER cut spending, they just can't bring themselves to do it. This was true in the 1990s, true under Rudd & Gillard, and will be the same under Shorten.

so selling the assets was a calculated move? umm right they're called assets for a good reason. That's all the Libs do is sell assets and claim we are economic geniuses

Shorten is literally proposing to DOUBLE the amount of refugees taken into Australia to 30,000 per year

They are all the Apex gang members, they are all the Jihadists

Labor brought the Sudanese, Somalis and Muslims into Australia. 3 years of Shorten and 90,000 more Apex gang members and Muslim Jihadis will call Australia home (and be stacked into Labor party branches).

If it's in your interest, be a cynical cunt and vote for Liberals. For example if you have a high paying corporate career, and/or come from a high net worth family

If you are middle or lower class, as in you earn less than

>voting for the unions
lol
Fuck off Dazza, ya dumb kunt
I am against illegal migration, and I also support massive reduction of legal migration to Australia.
That being said, Labor has indicated in the last few days that they'll likely cave into pressure to reverse the turn back policy. Illegal immigration will start up again.
If I have to choose between Labor letting in violent muslims unchecked, or choosing Liberals to bring in some smelly Indians that fix my internet, then the choice is a no brainer.
>no they sold assets and also revenue streams
share with me what assests and revenue streams they sold, and perhaps we can fix up the misunderstanding
>so selling the assets was a calculated move?
You think they did it by accident..?
>umm right they're called assets for a good reason
Yes, exactly right. Once they've reached the peak of their value, it's good to sell it off.
And then reinvest the money made into a new asset.
Perhaps you skipped out on your business management class or economics class, but, this is the general gist of how things go.
Like I said earlier on, let me know which assets you opposed the selling of.
>claim we are economic geniuses
Also quick daily reminder that all the best economists have been neo-liberal economists.
lol

Yeah nah m8, I can't argue with people this fucking retarded.

ONE

N A T I O N
A
T
I
O
N

Bingo.
ALP = Social & economic safety net
Libs = hurr durr free market rules bruh u on ur own

>so selling the assets was a calculated move?
You think they did it by accident..?
>umm right they're called assets for a good reason
Yes, exactly right. Once they've reached the peak of their value, it's good to sell it off.
And then reinvest the money made into a new asset.
Perhaps you skipped out on your business management class or economics class, but, this is the general gist of how things go.
Like I said earlier on, let me know which assets you opposed the selling of.
>claim we are economic geniuses
Also quick daily reminder that all the best economists have been neo-liberal economists.

this chunk of my post was for I'm such a shitcunt, I can't even click properly.

voting for the best interests of your nation trumps voting for your own personal need.

Yeah nah get fucked you dingo

t. 1st year uni student
Fight the power comrade

>Like I said earlier on, let me know which assets you opposed the selling of.

All of them

The treasury needs the revenue more than Xing Le Pty Ltd needs the revenue

A vote for privitization is a vote for globalisation at the expense of benefits to Australians

>Yeah nah get fucked you dingo

Please explain this comment

Vote Labor

I want to vote labor but I do think more immigrants will get in under them then under liberal.

Muslim detected
Having fun shitposting on behalf of daddies ethnic branch stack in the ALP?

Which Labor backbencher or minister does your ethnic stack control?

>100positivepolicies.org.au/

Labor shilling faggots will defend this garbage.

This and I support multiculturalism, gays and women.

>muh boats

Those libs will have you living like a poor white nigger while they sell the country to the chinks, but muh boats.

If you look at the stats it's literally no difference

It's never been a political issue except for when Hanson brought it up, both parties support it

Liberal party hack detected.

Labor have already announced they are doubling the Apex/Jihadi, I mean """refugee""" intake, to 30,000 per year.

Every Labor back bencher is letting on that they won't turn back the boats and will close down Nauru too, so expect Europe levels of Muslim invaders once they lose control of the borders again.

>voting Left
Literal cuck. If you are a heterosexual White man, there is literally no reason to ever vote Left.

Confirmed child of Labor ethnic branch stacker

Get the fuck out my country Achmed

>ALP
>left

I come from a poorer family raised by a single mother who only makes 50k a year but it's my first time voting this year.

Could they possibly be importing shitskins to fuel the construction industry? if our population isn't growing then nothing is getting built etc.. just a thought

>All of them
Examples mate. I was gonna say to give me three, but I'll make it easy. Just give me one.

>The treasury needs the revenue more than Xing Le Pty Ltd needs the revenue
>What is reinvesting
bruh, seriously, if you're in Victoria, please take Business Management 1&2 and Economics 1&2 when you reach year 11. It was great.
>A vote for privitization is a vote for globalisation at the expense of benefits to Australians
>at the expense of benefits to Australians
So this is what it comes down?
Giving benefits and handouts?
By reinvesting from the money made in our asset selling, we help ourselves in the long run by providing more opportunities in the future. Holding onto assets beyond their peak is stupid and will only hurt you.
>like a poor white nigger
>neo-liberal economy that makes you work if you wish to get ahead
Пpивeт тoвapищ! We better stop economic progress, am I right comrade?

Dude it's gotta be Labor. The iron fist Libs don't give a fuck about you.

Is he our guy?

>Fag marriage
>Doesn't want to protect our border
>Supports and is supported by workers unions

They're not Swedish-tier left, but they're still left mate.

>voting for the best interests of your nation trumps voting for your own personal need.

Your personal need usually coincide with the needs of others

I certainly don't want sensible unions being beaten back just so Liberals and their mates CEO Shekelstein can have a few more Gorillian boomerang dolaroos in his British Virgin Islands trust fund

NOT SMART

Are you trying to make a coherent sentence? Because it almost seems like, from your broken English, that you're proving me right. Feel free to defend thyself

Ha. Its funny, you talk as if you understand the internal mechanisms of the ALP. But we all know you don't know what you're talking about.

what they sold went up in value they werent peak. sold medicare,medicare raised prices for the sole reason of profit. a asset is there to aid the country

Shut the fuck up, you faggotron. I care about my Aussie, and I want them to do well

The choice is clear

they dont need to reinvest the sales from the assets, they can reinvest the profits from the assets

go fuck yourself you dumb cunt trying to be all patronizing muh year 11 economics

no asset should be privitized. corporations can compete in the market and if the operate more efficiently thats brilliant

but they get no free monopolies, fuck off

go be a globalist in america if you want

What happened to London, will happen to Sydney and Melbourne too.

Just look at Apex in Melbourne and Muslims in Western Sydney.

Shorten bringing 90,000 more Africans and Muslims is the tipping point of no return.

Unless we stop the Left and shit doen 3rd world immigration via the """refugee""" program, and keep the borders secure, we WILL experience a European style level of Muslim invasion, tens if not hundreds of thousands of Muslims, in addition to Shortens planned 90,000 that he'll fly in.

All Labor care about are getting new ethnic group members and families to stack into the Labor Party to beat out other Labor factions (who are stacking in other ethnic groups and families). They'll kill Australia like they have the UK if we let them.

They are these days. The Labor right is dying rapidly.

Have a read of these and decide:

>ausparty.org.au/page/attachment/36/asylum-seekers-and-border-protection

>ausparty.org.au/page/attachment/43/first-australians

>sold medicare,medicare raised prices for the sole reason of profit

What the fuck are you on about?

>all men

do people not see and realise what this is?

>raised by single mother
I have some tragic fucking news for you.

>>sold medicare,medicare raised prices for the sole reason of profit
your right. its late sorry. medibank

Vote ldp for freedom and to get your guns back

re

I think he's referring to medibank private, not medicare. Huge difference.

Although medibank private whilst in government hands was profitable and should not have been sold if you ask me.

There was nothing wrong with the sale of Medibank. Why should the Government have a stake in the private health insurance industry?

>FF supporting Labor and abandoning their policies for seats

Gonna need a source for that

What's wrong with unions? Do you want to work like a gook in a sweatshop?

pick the Jew you dumb fucks

Which one?

Remove boats.
Remove immigrants.

Do you want a handout?
Labor
Do you want a hand up?
Liberal

If you want to make 50k like your mum when you're a 50 year old man, vote Labor.
If you want our economy to prosper so that you have the opportunity to work hard and perhaps make double what your mum does if you play your cards right, then vote Liberal.
lel fucking based trips
>Your personal need usually coincide with the needs of others
Not particularly true.
I'll give a quick example.
I am a university student. It would be in my personal best interests to vote Labor. Because they would increase university spending as well as benefits to youths like me.
However, I know the costs behind this. The current working class would bear the brunt of this burden by either having taxes raised on them, or have taxes redirected from other programs to fund me.
I'm not willing to let that happen, because I understand it's more important to have a flowing and dynamic market place where the government doesn't constantly have to tax the fuck out of the working class just to make the lives easier for the few. Us students are not a majority by any means. The working class is.
>sensible unions
Quick reminder: although some unions are sensible, those working for construction and the like are not. They have way too much power, and the depth of their corruption has been proven. It's a cop out that I go to work to my part-time job on a Monday, but every second Monday our takings are consistently lower. Why? Because tradies have an RDO. They don't come to work. Long weekend every second weekend. Why? What part of their low-skilled jobs give them the right to have a day off while we pay for their kids to go to a public school?

Labor is controlled by ethnic branch stacks, whose loyalty is determined by payoffs to the ethnic leader of the group, usually an appointment to an quango, like the Ethnic Affairs Committees (and other variations) or if they are really good ethbic branch stackers, to the State upper house.

Just look at the names of the Upper House ALP members in your state.

Look at how Obeid started out, an ethnic community newspaper proprietor, who become so good at stacking the Labor Party with ethnic stacks, he stacked out an entire State Division and controlled through his ethnic stacks, a NSW Labor government.

Join the Party yourself and see. Get to know yourself the ethnic branch stack leaders and advance your career inside the party and movement.

Revenue stream