Which Calculator is correct?

Which Calculator is correct?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=URcUvFIUIhQ
symbolab.com/solver/step-by-step/6/2 \cdot \left(2+1\right)
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

ti-82 as always.

Allways Casio

Let the games begin

The blue one.

Left is correct. When ambiguous, same order of priority (In this case 6/2 or 2x3 first) follows left to right priority.
Parenthesis takes priority first of course, giving us 6/2x3, and because left to right is the solution 6/2=3, 3x3=9.
TI-82 master calculator.

/thread

ti for the academics and casio for the clerks and accountants
prove me wrong

These Threads are autistic

Casio is following the order of operations.
Also, if you turned this into a fraction where the dividing sign is, it would reduce to 1.

you want the result of 6/2 multiplied with the sum of (2+1).

solve the parenthesis and the division

3x3

result is 9, left is correct.

PEMDAS NIGGA

The casio. Multiply comes before divide.

We are turning it into a fraction where the dividing sign is. It then becomes 6 over 2.
That's what dividing is you mong.
6 over 2 reduces to 3. multiplied by 3 is 9.
Casio can suck my dick.
American ingenuity wins again.

you're not following the order of operations

top kek
gr8 b8 I r8 8/8

Those are different equations.

the casino one is doing the foil

PEMDAS
After P = 6/2*3
After E = 6/2*3
After M = 6/6
After D = 1
After A = 1
After S = 1

Dipshits.

>HURR DURR ALWAYS USE PEMDAS user TO DO EQUATIONS
>DURR NOOOO user DONT USE PEMDAS SOLVE THE EQUATION FROM LEFT TO RIGHT HURRR

This is why I hate fucking math.

The 2 and (2+1) would have to be in parenthesis for that to be the case. 3×3=9

The TI-82 is wrong because you have to distribute the 2 outside of the parentheses. If you follow the correct order of operations this is the process:

6/2(2+1)=?
6/(4+2)=?
6/6=1

The TI-82 is completely ignoring this and calculating the equation left-to-right

I smell summer.
As in somebody is fresh out of high school algebra at summer school.

literal retardation.

6/2(2+1)

6/2x3

6/6

1

Multiplication before division faggot

42 and been here for a long time, but close! Good guess!

Never made it through Trig tho.

It's:

Parentheses
Exponents
Multiplication or Division (when going left to right)
Addition or Subtraction (when going left to right)

So:
6/2(2+1)
6/2(3)
3(3)
9

youtube.com/watch?v=URcUvFIUIhQ

6/2(2+1)
6/2x3
3x3
9

>Teaching us to remember how to solve equations that are written out of order
>Instead of just teaching us to write equations in order

Sasuga, education system.

If it's M or D, you're right, but what I was taught is M first, then D.

If it were PEMDAS that would be the case. But when looking at an equation M and D, and A and S have the same priority. It may as well be PEDMSA.

6/2 (2+1)
6/(4+2)
6/6=1
Autism is overwhelming

>Which Calculator is correct?

if youre in 6th class, then the ti is right.
if you study it or math, the casio is right, since then the equations get more comlicated.
it depends on which way to solve it you chose.
the ti sees (6\2)x(1+2) while the casio sees 6\(2x(1+2)).
so i would say the idiot who compared this doesnt understand how math or brackets work in math.

you were taught wrong, which is not at all surprising

But that's wrong dumbass. What you did was assuming the equation was written as

6/(2(2+1) which it isn't. You do PEMDAS from left to right. The TI-82 did exactly that and got the right answer.

>Not writing 6 2 / 2 1 + *
Stay outside the master race, plebs

Good to hear user, I'm sure you'll provide us a scan of your drivers license to verify that. Unless you're still working on your permit. Which you are. Because you're 16 and shouldn't be here.

Fucking thank you I was just making along fucking reply explaining this but you shortened it for me....seriously thank you
Also this guy is the most correct

>urging him to post his ID so you can roast on his looks and derail the thread

gg

E stands for exponentiation dumbass. 2*3 is not exponentiation, that's multiplication.

Especially since I went to an American public school.

Well, most of it. It did spend a semester in a German International school... but I guess they didn't catch my problem.

Texas instruments is never incorrect

Fuck your Reverse Polish

Hey man, I gotta try.

Sure, I can do that. Just a sec.

RPN FTW!

How did you not catch your problem? At some point the blame lies on the student too. Did you never realize you were calculating your arithmetic wrong all these years?

thats not how it works. M and D are done as they appear from left to right

It's pemdas but multiplication and division are simply done from left to right before addition and subtraction are. Multiplication doesn't go BEFORE division. It's at the same time in order only from left to right

Uh, yeah. Notice how it's the same on the AFTER E line? dumbass...

* and / bind equally strong, and stronger than + and -:

> 6/2 (2+1)
> 6/2 * (2+1)
> 3 * (2+1)

Now you can either simplify the parantheses or expand it distributively:

> 3 * (3) = 9
OR
> 3 * 2 + 3 * 1
> 6 + 3 = 9

Confirm here also: symbolab.com/solver/step-by-step/6/2 \cdot \left(2+1\right)

Enjoy

Casio.

No multiplication and division have equal precedence. Same with addition and subtraction.

the casio

faggot

faggots

6/[2(2+1)] = 1
6/2(2+1) = 9

git gud scrubbz

samefaggot, kill yourself

What I'm saying is it's more like:
P
E
MD
AS

You're just moving along the equation and doing either multiplication or division in the third step. Whatever comes first regardless of whether it's multiply or divide.

...

This
when it comes to multiplication and division it just goes from left to right. Multplication does not take priority over division simply because multiplication comes first in "pemdas"
same with add and subtract

Oh look, proof!

Yer smart, user.

faggot

they are both right the difference is each calculator uses a different sign for division which changes the outcome

Hahahahaahaha looks like your typical Sup Forums user.

Nope, never did.

actually neck yourself you faggot

>first licensed 2016
I hope you're not an immigrant, son.

Yeah, I may be. Computer nerd making 6 figures, wife and 3 kids.

Then again, I have no fucking clue what a "typical" Sup Forumstard is, as I've seen so many different ones.

SEE IMAGE.

BOTH answers are correct.

When written to the side as it is done, the TI is stating answer A. Completely. Correct. Written in english it reads,

> "Six over two multiplied by two plus one."

The CASIO is also correct. It does not use a fractional division. It uses logical division. In english it reads:

> "Six divided by two which is multiplied by the sum of two plus one."

AKA, everyone here got trolled. GGWP

Fuckyeah ambiguous operators.

Nah, just moved from Atlanta, which was a fucking shit hole.

Born and raised in Cali, a couple years in Germany, a few months in Holland.

Don't be retarded.
Get this.

multiplication goes first when theres no multiplication sign.

6/2(2+1) = 1
6/2*(2+1)=9

division is division no matter what symbol you use

That's not a beard, that's laziness.

I mean, the next logical conclusion is to post a paystub and the I.D. of your wife and kids.

If the casio used the A b/c button as a fractional division operator, the CASIO would have the same answer as the TI.

These are different equations. You are all autists.

Division doesnt exist. Only fractions.

>Atlanta
>a fucking shit hole
Possibly the most accurate description of Atlanta I've ever seen.

Where the fuck did you hear that from? Multiplication is implicit if there's no sign. Thank god you're not in charge of anything consequential.

>Please
>Eliminate
>My
>Dickhead
>Aunt
>Shithead

And my blood type and genetic code.

Otherwise, there's no real proof.

And a vocaroo would help, as would a video chat with me and my family with them all providing IDs. (Not that my 10 year old has one... let alone my 17 year old)

totally different equation

That traffic. Fuck that fucking traffic in its fucking fuck hole.

To make it a fraction like that the EQ would read as

6 / ( 2 ( 2 + 1 ) )
6 / ( 2 ( 3 ) )
6 / 6
1

But that's not how it reads. It reads like this:
6 / 2 (2 + 1)
6 / 2 (3)
3 ( 3 )
9

I seriously don't understand why people have problems following simple rules of mathematics.
I bet someone in this thread will claim it goes like this

6 / 2 ( 2 + 1)
6 / ( 4 + 2)
6 / 6
1

Your wrong though. Sad.

This is literally the answer. Get out your fucking calculators.

In general I agree with this, but the TI is actually reading this as 6 over 2*3 because it's smarter and handles fractions.

The other calculator is simply answering a different question that is badly formatted.

>Multiplication is implicit if there's no sign.
no shit, thats what i said. buut if theres no sign it gets priority. example:

X=6

6/2X
6/12
0.5

6/2*X
3*6
18

see? youre fucking stupid

>your

its clear that you are not smart

Blue is right, does this even need to be explained?

>Even calculators from USA are stupid

No it doesn't. My point was that if there's no sign you still treat it like regular multiplication. It's exactly the same. I challenge you to point to a legitimate site somewhere that actually says a lack of a multiplication sign means it gets precedence.

pemdas faggot

But the TI is right and its from Texas while the Casio is wrong and its from Japan.

Not knowing that first is parentheses second is multiplication and third is dividing.

mfw

Google says 9

>its clear that your not smart
FTFY

The one on the left
Equation is 6 / 2 * (2+1) = 6 / 2 * 3 which is 9

light blue? or dark blue?

6/2x(2+1)

6/2x3
3x3
9