"I lubricated myself" Than what happened?

"I lubricated myself" Than what happened?

I have never seen a LVT film that wasn't just "look how shocking I made this art! Aren't I a shocking ariste?"

I pissed myself.

what are these movies about?

Lars Von Trier's cuck fetishes.
You think I'm memeing? I'm not.

Lady gets raped, or almost raped. Is taken in by an old Swede. He listens as she tells him about her 60 years of sexual adventures. He tries to rape her in the end.

You see, we are ALL nymphos, John.

Were these films supposed to be good?

and then John was a slut

The first volume is good in my opinion, but it gets overhanded and pretentious in the second one. First one has some scenes that also push close to that, but second one is just full on pretense.

You just can't appreciate good art, user. Like in Antichrist, when Dafoe's character ejaculated blood? Such a moving and powerful statement about humanity. But I bet you just thought it was icky.

Would be painful to extremes

answer my question pls

Watch the movie to find out what happened next.

All I remember is the girl was real fucking hot

it doesn't say

It really ruined it when she aged into charlotte gainsbourg

Shirley you can't be serious.

Charlotte Gainsbourg is literally a witch and the only thing the young Joe has going for her is that she's a younger witch.

Don't forget that the old swede was it turns out a virgin, and then she shoots him when he tried to rape her.
Better get laid now boys.

She's a big girl

Man, these were so shitty compared to Antichrist and Melancholia

any other essential whitewomengangbangedbyblackmen-kino?

I ain't talking about her you silly goose.

It kind of did a bit. They kept Shia for both movies but ditched the girl cause she was too young and pretty(?)

Was there literally nothing they could do in makeup to make her older or was she just a really shit choice to play as an older woman?

They're ALL shitty. See

That dirty, cheeky Swede.

>I ain't talking about her you silly goose

Then who are you talking about? Really the only other girl is her train friend.

I personally loved Antichrist and enjoyed Melancholia. But both the Nympho volumes were pretentious.

nymphomaniac is lars' best film and one of the very greatest films ever made. if you can't understand that you are a retard.

Aside from content being considered pretentious or edgy, his movies are very stylish and many parts are extremely well staged.

Its funny that he isn't talked about more desu. He's genuinely experimental, borderline autist "what-can-i-say-i-understand-hitler" and seems like he's into waifuism.

Really looking forward to the house jack built. Nymphomaniac was crappy but LVT is still one of the more interesting film makers in modern time IMO.

Nymphomaniac or this?

You first spoke as if I was referencing Charlotte. I'm talking about her younger self, Stacy Martin

Edge for edge's sake. That's all he is. He's a college freshman "filmmaker" who somehow got somebody to give him money.

It's by far the worst out of the depression trilogy

>I'm talking about her younger self, Stacy Martin

Ok. Shes the one who I called a young witch. She's a spoopy skelly with a 5/10 face. I'm worried that you think she's "fucking hot."

t. someone who didn't get the the other films in the first place

...

I'd still do her. Her lewd scene were quite hot and lewd.

I'm pretty sure there are elements ripped directly out of his earlier works and shoved straight into this movie but executed poorly.

Movie is shit compared to his other works.

t. retarded tripfag

>not understanding referencing your own work
>not understanding that referencing his own work was an homage to tarkovsky who did the same thing

The Boss Of It All is a very standard comedy

So, at last, I've become the NYMPH()MANIAC

You've never seen his earlier work then, watch more films

melancholia wasn't even shocking

Nympho is better, but i liked Love too. I have high hopes for Noe

wasted so much time watching this for the faps. Only like 3 great jacking off scenes, everything else is useless filler

>>>/spankbang.com/

it's better in feature films/ tv shows because it's with actresses who wouldn't do porn otherwise

The anons in this thread doth protest too much, me thinks.

LVT is provocative. And sometimes he holds his middle finger to the audience and asks them to swivel on it. Some people need to feel like the director is telling them that they are an intelligent audience. When they get fucked with, they get mad and post hyperbolic character assassinations on Sup Forums:

especiallyI see a lot of people calling "pretentious". So what? What is the substance of your claim? Pretentious is far from the worst thing a film can be. Cinema is an act of fiction after all. Self-indulgence and fantasy go hand in hand.

It's okay to be frustrated by a film, to hate it even, but come up with some reasoning that goes beyond a mindless dismissal.


Kek I was a little taken out of the film by that too, not that LVT cares about constant immersion. I did think that Charlotte's body looked a lot more vulnerable and weathered, which makes some sense in terms of the story. It was a pity to lose dem young perky titties.

Good post. A lot of people here don't understand what a provocateur is

so refreshing so see reasonable, non-aggressive people on this site

Thanks, friendos. I am, however, awaiting the shitstorm with glee.

Glad you found a safe space. Would you like some trigger warnings, too?

>can't attack the substantive post the user was responding to.
>decides to fling shit at reasonable by-standers instead.

What age are you user?

case and point
I dont mind people saying faggot or nigger or anything like that, I was talking about the passive aggressive way people talk about films/filmmakers here
Like people dismissing something as complete garbage without making any sort of attempt to actually argue their point or having an open mind and trying to see some worth in it or empathize with the filmmaker and what he could have been trying to get across
I really will never get these type of people who are so narcisistic that they believe their opinion is the objective truth and can't be reasoned with
And please don't let Sup Forums get too much into your head, your comment could literally have been made by a machine generating generic Sup Forums posts, i'm surprised you didn't call me an sjw or cuck too