Why does CNN lie?
Why does CNN lie?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
politifact.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
washingtonpost.com
twitter.com
>Only one side of the coin lies
There was both riots and peaceful demonstrations, dipshit.
CNN is bullshit, always has been. TV news is never to be trusted. It's wall-to-wall lies.
Oh, and Jews.
Can your small mind imagine that both riots and peaceful protests took place in the city during the several day long event?
Because liberals swallow their lies like europeans swallow refugee nut.
Daytime Not that violent and more pll that actuly care about protesting G20
Nighttime Riot-tourists that whant to destroy shit and stuff.
>TV is bullshit
>trust insane youtube videos and shill websites instead
Don't forget their favorite politicians. The media lies! Believe what our politicians spew out of their mouths instead, they have no reason to lie or distort facts.
F A K E N E W S
A
K
E
N
E
W
S
>Why does CNN lie?
Because being a libtard is being undiagnosed or denial that you have a disease of the mind.
Why do Democrats not admit they fixed their own primary to appoint Hillary over the significantly more elected, Bernie Sanders?
>being a democrat
>being in denial you are a libtard
>thinking you are smart
>not realizing the democratic party has cased the downfall of America beginning with William Clinton's office being bought by the Chinese
politifact.com
Cnn, like all news outlets, does it's best to be as accurate and honest as possible. As seen on politifact a majority of statement are mostly or entirely true and a vast majority are at least partly true (usually true with some biased analysis). What's truly concerning is how Trump has rallied Reublicans against the even more credible new York times and Washington Post. As seen in the chart, it would seem, beyond WSJ, most Republicans get their news from Glenn beck, Fox news, and Breitbart which have grisly low scores on politifact. I think the real question is when will sheep learn to do independent research online to discover where and how to find accurate information rather than just trusting their Facebook news feed.
OP, you paint a great picture of what is fucked up with our time.
Another fucking idiot getting all excited about a dumb simplified mspaint mashup. Here's some breaking decidedly non-fake news for you: almost everything truly news worthy in this world is pretty complicated. Only MSpaint mashups and oratory of the orange monkey you voted for have it in them to make something complex appear a simple, black and white derpfest.
In this particular case, and I consider it mind blowing this needs to be explained to you btw, both headlines are true. There were thousands of peaceful protesters/protests during G20. By night, assholes burning cars appeared. These events or resulting headlines are not mutually exclusive.
Do you know how to use an internet search engine? cnn did loads of reporting on car burning bits, too.
It would be great if world or truth fit in a single retarded mspaint-made jpg. Is not the case.
Except the whole Donald Jr email issue kinda proves otherwise. They intended to work with Russia
Fake news! Not like all of them have been saying for the past 6 months they never met with Russians. They weren't lying, the media was the whole time.
Cuz it's CNN.
>Implying politifact is unbiased.
Left leaning/liberalism is most closely tied to education level and urban living. I understand that being educated might seem like a disease to you, but trust me college would have done you good kid. Get out of your town. Go live in a city for a few years and live/experience the lives of others. You'll begin to understand a lot more about what this country does great, but also where it deeply struggles and needs help moving forward. That open-mindedness, understanding, and dedication to bettering oneself is what makes the Democratic party so important right now, and the nomination of Hillary over Bernie so disappointing
How is it fake if someone admits to it and openly sends the information to the public?
But they did meet with Russians, you retard.
Example, please. I've read into many of politifact's articles and ratings. They source themselves very well, and thoroughly explain each rating.
You are trying to argue with a trump supporter. It is like trying to comb your hair to please the eye of a blind retard. Do it for yourself if you really like. Don't expect it to get through.
That's literally their purpose. To check statements with facts and figures rather than emotions or wants. Everything is sourced, including damning evidence against stements of both liberal and conservative news outlets, so any bias the employees may have is essentially moot
>oratory of the orange monkey you voted for
OP here.
I didn't vote for trump.
Did that effort-post make you feel euphoric?
I was being sarcastic
>mfw but one party lies more so its biased
Dtj was referring to the russian governemnt in "not meeting with the russians" which so far is completely true
Why the hell would he say he never met with ANY people of russian nationality? Thats just stupid
Whoa, you really found the gist of my post, great job skippy.
>Being this new.
Sure is summer in here.
>Why does X media group lie?
>Here's some evidence from Y media group which are totally legit because I agree with them
Big media is the problem, not just CNN
>Whoa, you really found the gist of my post, great job skippy.
>You disagree with me?
>You must be a newfag!
Cancer
>Can your small mind imagin
Lol. You Americans are so dumb. The G20 was mostly riots and very aggressive protest which ran into the tens of thousands on a daily basis. There were no "peaceful" organized protests over here and if there was, they were either staged or had nothing to do with the G20. We saw the protests and violence daily on our news here with things lit up with petrol and much damage. Anyone who was actually here would NEVER characterize any of this as peaceful.
Idgaf about your CNN or whether or not you dumb Amerifags recognize that most of Europe hates corporations and would salivate over having your Trump instead of our puppet Merkel, but to pretend any of the G20 protests were "peaceful", or worse to paint that in the media, is just a sad statement about how far you Americucks have fallen in your media-controlled political brainwashing. No wonder all of your media lied to you about your Hillary Clinton being the winner in a landslide to manipulate your votes so no one would actually go out and vote for Trump as it being a lost cause and you imbeciles believed them all.
Land of the Free, huh?
Think again, mind-controlled dumbasses. You haven't had free thought since the Clinton's took over in the late 90's as your media has been owned by one of your political parties.
Because they are zionist
Yawn
...
>can't tell me nothin
...
...
Proves nothing, retard. It proves absolutely nothing.
Amerifat detected
Nice propaganda m8. Good design, excellent sources and statistics, great product that the listed sources are benign
Wow, took me 30 seconds to find multiple video sources from different news outlets of peaceful protests.
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
There were both riots and peaceful protests.
This response is getting tired, user. You must be a liberal. Someone says something you don't agree with? Summerfag! Fuck you, faggot.
Your chart doresn't explain anything that you don't want to believe. "The Economist" is well-known to have a liberal bias amongst its readership. Jake Tapper has a hate boner against Trump, but should really send our God Emperor a fruit basket, because he helped save the network. Fucking Fox News doesn't like Trump, they just work under the premise that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." Start watching and consuming these media, instead of searching for infographics that people who do consume these media can easily poke holes in, you would know this.
You left out support for blm against evil white people.
Apparently you are retarded.
Every single scientifically-refereed study has shown Republicans are over a full standard deviation more intelligent than Democrats.
To suggest otherwise also shows no common sense. Intelligent people make money and don't want to give it all away to the government to inefficiently dispense government handouts to the lazy, undeserving, thankless, and illegals.
Here's a very unbiased study (from not only outside the U.S., but in the ultra-liberal UK, no less) where they set out to find Democrats and liberals being more intelligent than Republicans, and instead found the opposite:
"Research has consistently shown that intelligence is positively correlated with socially liberal beliefs and negatively correlated with religious beliefs. This should lead one to expect that Republicans are less intelligent than Democrats. However, I find that individuals who identify as Republicans have slightly higher verbal intelligence than those who identify as Democrat (2-5 IQ points), and that individuals who supported the Republican Party in elections have slightly higher verbal intelligence than those who supported the Democratic Party (2 IQ points."
Intelligence 44 (2014) 142-148
Carl, Oxford, United Kingdom
Get a clue "kid". What a sad little brainwashed imbecile you must be. Good job drinking your masters' koolaid, "kid".
Wtf? Are you denying any millenials say these things? Pull your head out of your ass, faggot.
Yeah, actually. That's my favorite. All politicians lie to varying degrees so, never lose your caution over claims that don't seem to be verifiable.
MFW when I get accused of being a Trump voter, a Eurocuck, and a liberal all in the same thread.
Being a retard ties in perfectly with being a liberal
>in these target demographics
Most republicans are trailer trash. I'm pretty sure you're full of shit.
>research paper written in 'I' form
Absolutely disgusting.
Bahahahaha. Fucking BuzzFeed. XD
>god emperor
Fucking magafags get back to |pol/
Trump is a piece of shit. He's been a joke in ny for decades, he's a scammer and liar so bad he can't even borrow money from US banks.
That you support him says more about your low intelligence and unwillingness to even do basic reasarch.
>college would have done you good kid.
Ah, so pew research is bullshit now too, Despite their complete sources and provided statistical analysis. You're right those two simple observations went way beyond a team of PhD researchers
How 'Ye doin'?
I'm survivin'
I was drinkin' earlier
Now I'm drivin'...
>Amerifat detected
u fucking twit
he's obviously not american
but apparently you are too dumb to know why
germans all write English the same way if you are not aware and he made two obvious and consistent gramatical slips that reveal he is a germanfag through and through
that you think an amerifat even wrote this shows how little you know about anything internationally
Yeah, you're such a winner. Wow, user, go out into the daylight now and scream in the street how you are smarter than some poeple on the internet! Do it! And watch total strangers flock to you in admiration and adoration, just to touch the fabric of the clothing you wear. Bottom lone is, you're a fucking Sup Forums loser. You have nothing to be proud of, pseudo intellectual faggot.
Hey,nI've got two words that can prove your attempt to mock me is spot on: Nate Silver. Remember when he cracked the code and figured out that Clinton was going to win by a comfortable 4 point margin? Do you remember what actually happened? You can cite as many institutes, PhDs, standards of objectivity that you want. Things weren't as they were described on election night, and they probably aren't now, either.
>Bottom lone is, you're a fucking Sup Forums loser. You have nothing to be proud of, pseudo intellectual faggot.
>Projecting this hard.
How about the pew research study that put forth that right leaning republican majorities believe college to be harmful to the us. Fact is that just because one study agrees with you don't mean the majority do. Intelligent people may understand that they have an opportunity millions don't and may, like Bill Gates, be give a huge portion of their money to helping those less fortunate. The impoverished do vote Democrat which may create a large statistical tends towards low education opportunities (correlated to iq) and Democratic voters. On the other hand, higher education is a 70-80% correlation to Democratic votership as well. But what do I know as you said I'm just a retard. Who cares about my bachelor's in mathematics
Non scientist tries to science. Cherry picking an article as well as cherry picking parts of said article.
>"findings suggest that higher intelligence among classically liberal Republicans compensates for lower intelligence among socially conservative Republicans."
Lol, so in your cherry picked article, the author even admits the more liberal Republicans make up for the conservatards.
Also, see image
remember when comey restarted the hilary investigation and it became front page news days before the election and it completely threw off all those numbers?
No the person you were responding to but, Silver projected a 75% chance of a Hilary win. That's only a three in 4 chance that she wins. That's how projections work. The fact that it cam up tails twice on two coin flip, effectively, isn't a sign of anything but the odds not favoring their side. Like, seriously. If you think 75% chance of a win means a guaranteed win, don't ever go to a casino.
not him nor do i believe ALL the protests were violent (but clearly nearly all were in some way adn few were peaceful), but holy fuck you are fucking stupid:
here's what you posted as "proof" that CNN was telling the truth:
>youtube.com
A video of a sole (completly alone) hippie, who was making a joke as to the fact that the protests were NOT peaceful by playing a game of tic-tac-toe on teh sidewalk with the "peace" symbol used in place of an "X".
Hint: they are FUCKING MOCKING the fact that it is peaceful.
Good job showing how retarded you are.
FYI, the same video sequence shows at least 41 different violent protests with legion riot police throughout Hamburg and nasty violence. Your "proof" video is a mockery, dumbass. Here's the next video in the sequence, btw, for you to see what really went on in Hamburg and how CNN is so obviously not telling the truth. Just look at it and get a clue:
I'm denying that the picture you're painting is the same person.
Imo it's for-profit media.
Getting a nice dose of entertainment/outrage/affirmation with your news is one way of keep the clicks coming.
And there's no obvious thing to do about that. Enhancing news to make it more iteresting also means it's gonna get bias and fake.
Lol, no, observing this hard.
Sick of you smug faggots with your accusations of "newfag" and "summerfsg" and "mfw..."
You are expressing pride in being the one standing in a pile of shit the longest, which, if being the only thing you have to trumpet about yourself, says loads about just how low the level of you being a loser is. Faggot.
>but in the ultra-liberal UK
>ultra-liberal
>UK
All news organizations lie. Especially RT.
So you see yourself as the person in the photo, but you never say any of those things. Correct?
Umm, the damage from these 'peaceful' protests (violent riots) has since been shown to be over $6M Euros. Whole rows of stores were smashed and raided, and hundreds of vehicles were set on fire, along with 4 buildings. Polize were out in the thousands everywhere trying to stop it, using water cannons, CS gas, pepper spray, and beatings of people. 428 arrests, 1,622 hospitalized, 3 dead.
not sure how any media could credibly call this peaceful but if your cnn said that, shame on you americucks for being that dumb
Thread. OP is a dumb a fuck and can't comprehend.
>why does Trump lie?
>cites Washington Post
Kek
Haha, so true.
Reeeeeee!
Your implying college degrees equal intelligence which is pretty fucking stupid
I see facts are not for you, you probably prefer alternative facts, go watch faux news
As a moderate and the adult in the room, I'll tell you that CNN is lame but the best that's available on American TV by far and away.
CNN is run by Jews who understand how to appeal to the lowest common denominator.
Yup, this.
A few factors to consider;
Universities and colleges are strongly dominated by left leaning professors, especially in sociology departments. Right-leaning professors are being pushed out of tertiary education. Universities and colleges are becoming increasingly more partisan, and outside of the hard sciences, students are noticeably being taught what to think, rather than how to think. Left leaning professors are using sociology departments to push their opinions under the guise of false academic endorsement. They're an echo-chamber clique that 'peer review' each other, then cite each other as credible sources. Outside scrutiny is aggressively avoided or attacked. If you'd taken any sociology electives, you'd already know this.
Anyone who actually has attained at least a Bachelors knows that it doesn't necessarily correlate to being more intelligent. While the STEM fields do encourage critical thinking, no one is immune to their own biases. Truly intelligent people know that they don't know everything, and don't rely on their 'credentials' to validate their opinions on matters unrelated to the field they studied in. I know about 100 mildy autistic people in their early 20s that A+'d their way through Engineering and Maths papers. They're also complete fucking idiots.
t. BEng
Ah yes, the classic "there's no difference between my highschool ged and a PhD in mathematics or statistics"
She's way too hot for her tits to be that disappointing. They're just so floppy.
Yuck.
nice thread so far, i only have one thing to add
CNN doesnt really lie, neither does FOX. Perception is reality and most disagreements come down to an ideological split.
Ultimately, both political parties are self-interested organizations that are less focused on delivering a quality candidate than preserving their own institution and keeping their elbows on the table.
Hence: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump
Neither candidate was actually electable. The political parties have established with this most recent Presidential election that they do not even care about their constituencies and are instead, more focused on electing distracting fools while the American public is mercilessly assraped by municipal and state level governements.
don't know who your mayor, councilperson or state representatives are? that was their total goal. ever wonder how we got a likely-senile, crude, reality TV star in the white house? it was because of this goal.
People are discussing local politics even less now. No one can shut the fuck up about Trump. the next 3 1/2 years are going to be full of Trump saying outlandish shit on twitter and you fucking idiots will still be talking about it/arguing over what news is fake with no connection to the actual politicians that shape your lives
No I'm saying that you're taking the most educated and informed from a population and grouping them with that populations most ignorant. By doing so you discredit the resources used by the highly informed community by grouping them beside the likes of BuzzFeed and other less respected outlets
>pretty sure you're full of shit
umm, he cited to a published journal article backed by scientific data
apparently you are just that dumb
umm, actually this is standard practice
when there are multiple authors, it is "we find . . ."
when there is one author, it is "I find . . ."
literally millions of publications say the exact same thing and it is 100% accurate
source: me, a ph.d. in chemistry who has been reading journal articles every day for 13 years now (1000's)
>research paper
fyi, you don't even seem to understand this is not a "research paper"
a research paper is mere research, and is not scrutinized by the field for accuracy as to the scientific methods and conclusions drawn
this is a published article in a scientific journal which means it had to fit into a whole bunch of criteria for submission standards, was submitted, reviewed for likely 6 months to 2 years by a random and anonymous panel of independent top researchers and professors at universities in the field, attacked by them (as is typical) for the author to further support the data and conclusions ultimately drawn, then if approved from there (unanimously as to scientific soundness), goes to a publishing committee for whether or not it is sound and worthy of publishing in the next volume of that journal
lol @ "research paper" in "I" form and "absolutely disgusting"
you are a very, very ignorant person, self-blinded by your own delusions
fyi, i could care less about your american political parties, but that journal article was extremely sound science and pretty obviously dispenses of the issue as to which of whatever of your political parties has the more intelligent people
everything else is just anecdotal and pure nonsense
your republicans appear to be significantly more intelligent than your democrats, but i hate you both equally fwiw
NOT EVERYONE THAT PROTEST RIOTS RETARD
Fox lol
...
You picked one of the three examples, the weakest of the three to make your point. Nice way to distort the facts. There were estimated 78,000 protestors midday Saturday with next to no rioting. And there are many more than the 3 I posted.
Yes, there were tons of riots, it was crazy. But that doesn't mean there weren't large groups of peaceful protestors. CNN isn't "fake news" for reporting on both.
There were both riots and peaceful protests.
$
i have to say I am pretty disgusted by the liberal media at this point in my life and I have been liberal for 30 years
all the talk about safe spaces, micro-aggressions, gender identities is so fucking stupid its unreal. Trump won because liberals are so fucking annoying that they actually drove conservatives to VOTE. the liberals of both parties seem more concerned with thought-policing and their own personal enrichment (See: Bernie sanders evading taxes, committing fraud).
like I am all for respecting people's identities and shit, but are we fucking france now? in this country, lets just say you say "i hate niggers" at a walmart. tasteless, but not illegal. in france you say some shit like this, you can be jailed for 2 years... we are like less than five years away from thoughts being illegal and that shit is fucking horrifying and anti-american
been a democratic voter my whole life, did note vote for either presidential candidate. voting in 2017 is antiamerican, it gives legitimacy to a system that doesnt deserve it and enables these assholes to grandstand on issues like gender identity and bathroom bills, earn brownie points from millenial shitheads while they do fucking nothing for the people suffering in this country at the hands of total, unrestrained, and blind capitalism
Not him, but Jesus, kid. You need to stop. You are seriously embarrassing us at this point. I'm a lifelong Democrat but it has always been obvious that Republicans, on average, are the more intelligent party. I'm not sure why any of you millienial loudmouths have started a propaganda campaign pretending the opposite is true, but that's just sad.
Oh, and your image is laughable as the U.S. Census Bureau, NOT ONLY DOESN'T COLLECT ANY OF THAT TYPE OF DATA, EVER, but also the U.S. Census happens every ten years (and it is forced to do so by the U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 2 for the purpose of determining House of Representative seats for each state) and the last one was in 2010, so it is literally an impossibility for them to have published anything about the "2016 election". You'd literally have to wait to the 2020 census to collect this data, and it would NEVER be collected anyway as it is outside the federal guidelines.
Who is making that propaganda nonsense?
How sad that someone here regurgitates it as "fact".
This idiot is a special kind of stupid. Please leave my party, you are making us Democrats appear dumber by the second. We weren't winning to begin with and we have long suspected it is because of you.
>umm
>umm
>literally
>actually
>fyi
>fyi
Nice tumblr-posting. You're a liberal aren't you sweetie?
No one ever write in "I" form, unless student in primary school
>Non scientist tries to science.
Omfg, did you just post that image and claim he with an actual hard citation to an actual journal article is the "non-scientist"?
Pretty sure he is science-as-fuck, and you are retard-as-fuck. This is especially true if you actually believe Republicans are less intelligent that Democrats when any moron with common sense could tell you the opposite is so obviously true. It's not even close, you imbecile.