ITT: Bands with amazing sonic evolution.
I don't ever care if they're even good or not, just bands where if you listened to their first album and their last album without knowing who they are you wouldn't know it was the same band/artist.
ITT: Bands with amazing sonic evolution
Jack Perez
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
David Cooper
...
Joshua Watson
Well, you're not technically wrong.
Owen Bennett
The band that did "Creep"
Josiah Gomez
Maybe not their first and last, but if you told me the guys that made Pure Guava also made White Pepper I wouldn't believe you
Zachary Evans
You know it to be true
>they could have been the next Beatles, if they were smarter
Cooper Robinson
I like them but thats just wrong
Logan Brown
Hey, you can deny an explosion of talent and maturity since Blink-182
Also, for some reason, their early songs remind me of Pet Sounds
Jace Clark
Ulver of course.
Christian Davis
mbv
Nolan Morris
...
Nathan Brown
>bands that succumb to trends and marketing ploys, the thread
Adam Ramirez
Black Sabbath
Nathan Phillips
Ah, yes, because Revolution 9 was part of the sound collage trend amongst all the 68 teeny boppers.
I could've just as easily posted Zappa or Waits.
Gavin Lewis
this
Also Animal Collective
Mason Scott
Which marketing ploy?
Bands followed The Beatles trends.
Adam Wood
muh acid was literally every album in 1968. any original psychedelic band peaked in 1967 anyway
Dominic Diaz
Revolution 9 wasn't exactly like the generic muh acid though. And since Tomorrow Never Knows came out in 66 I guess your point is moot by your own reasoning?
Luke Nguyen
>Who are the Zombies
Kayden Harris
The band Oceana made a really cool transition, . Used to be metal core, they're shit now making synth oriented music and have a different name, but there was a nugget of great music made on their EP mid transition.
>First Album (metalcore)
youtube.com
>Transitional period (rock music with a fantastic temperament)
youtube.com
I've posted the "transition song" here before but I never get replies. I don't know if its because this board is super dismissive of old metalcore bands or what but someone should give this a shot, it's a good jam.
Brody Cooper
with exception of the beatles, and the zombies, who were literally
>marketing, the band
anyway
Kevin Adams
The fuck happened?!?
Austin Rodriguez
>The Zombies
What are you referencing here?
Samuel Wright
why has nobody posted this yet
Aaron Morales
Ulver is a good one
Mason Ortiz
...
Justin White
Deftones went from angsty nu-metal to shoegazey alt-metal to djenty chug chug metal and all of it is good.
Matthew Nguyen
>Djenty chug chug metal
Kek
Dominic Williams
>all of it is good.
Dominic Gonzalez
name a bad Deftones album
Ethan Stewart
Most good bands r like this
Ryder Lopez
Guys fucking Nirvana
By the end they reached the perfect mix of all of the things they were trying to say
Mason Watson
This fucking band right here. The remastered version of pic related is god-tier
Adam Gomez
Why is beatles style songwriting dead?
And by that I mean, pop music with modulation, out of key chords, tempo changes, etc etc etc
Obviously this applies to a lot of pop music of Beatles time, but it seems that a lot of pop is groove based. By that I mean, stay in one key and pretty much remains there, plays the same riff over and over.
I just mean in a pop music context btw, I'm aware that more niche genres like prog stuff and metal will have more complex writing.
Easton Sanders
Tyler, The Creator
Dominic Cooper
In normal language groove based describes funk but i guess you special
Oliver King
>Describes funk hurr durr
You obviously aren't aware that a "groove" can be multiple things. Have you ever heard of a band "getting into a groove"? That's what I mean. REPETITION. Will that suffice or do you need to be more autistic about words?
Caleb Lee
Black flag changed alot
Isaiah Howard
Have you ever heard of not being a social retard and knowing what terms mean in general culture? Are you black?
John Hill
Out of interest what du like thats not groove based by your definition
Brody Bailey
Stereolab definitely.
>lo-fi noise pop --> krautrock meets TVU meets france --> electronic lounge future music --> electronic jazz future music --> stripped-back dual-mono indie pop --> lush playful art pop
Elijah Fisher
Ulver completely changed genres at least a dozen times
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
Blake Torres
>any original psychedelic band peaked in 1967 anyway
nice blanket statement moron.
>Silver Apples
>OTC
Aaron Ortiz
you should have said it is rhythmically focused, or focused on repetition of simple melodies, then. most pop is not based on grooves.
Asher Thompson
>>Who are the Zombies
William Torres
>The Zombies
>Marketing: the band
Listen to Odessey and Oracle. The songs have some super unusual themes for the era.
Julian Mitchell
From a broader ethnomusicological perspective, groove has been described as "an unspecifiable but ordered sense of something that is sustained in a distinctive, regular and attractive way, working to draw the listener in."[2] Musicologists and other scholars have analyzed the concept of "groove" since around the 1990s. They have argued that a "groove" is an "understanding of rhythmic patterning" or "feel" and "an intuitive sense" of "a cycle in motion" that emerges from "carefully aligned concurrent rhythmic patterns"
Apparently pop music of today, which is mostly dance music, is not based on grooves :-)