Can we talk about Dennis Prager for a bit?
He has started a series on online videos which seem to attack a lot of the left wing cultural marxism that's occurring lately
See for example:
youtube.com
youtube.com
He's also an Orthodox Jew.
Do Jews even divide and fight along political lines?
Other urls found in this thread:
Nice
He looks like Larry David's little brother
How is he Orthodox without the long temple-bangs things?
The majority of religious Jews are right wing and vote Republican 2:1. Cultural Jews are overwhelmingly leftist. Most Jews in the US are secular.
Prager is a neocon and Zionist, he has actually fund-raised for the ADL, but other than that I adore him and listen to his show regularly.
He is the premiere illustration of my 85% right idea, that, instead of finding the perfect, we should find people we can mostly accept, give or take a few blind spots.
Prager is a great and brilliant man and listening to his broadcasts, speeches, Prager University lectures and so on, bearing in mind that he is of course wrong about foreign policy, will absolutely benefit you.
Prager on happiness alone justifies everything else.
It's interesting because there are quite a few Jews trying to push a left-wing marxist education system and agenda.
There seems to be direct fighting amongst them.
There are several different groups. The ones you're thinking of are Haredim (ultra-Orthodox, bordering on Amish-like restrictions) or Hassidic (members of a movement from 18th century Lithuania). Orthodox is just stricter than Conservative, which is stricter than Reform.
Check out brother nathaniel dor former talmud elite turned christian fighter
ok
I mainly remember him from the early 2000's shilling like a maniac for the Iraq war, dismissing war doubters as "traitors," etc.
I haven't bothered to listen to him after that disgrace.
I disagree with that and reject it.
The Jew is a Semite and adheres to Semitic communalism. Many Jew-Gentile conflicts really boil down to Semitic communalism bumping into European individualism. Everything about "they're all in it together" falls under that. In the Middle East, for survival, everybody from Tribe A really is in a vast conspiracy against Tribe B, and vice versa. It is how that part of the world works. And one of the oldest tricks is to loudly advertise superficial conflict while maintaining substantive cohesion.
That said, Dennis is very good.
That guy's just a joke. Prager actually has serious learning and frequently explains things that are misrepresented or that everybody thinks they know but do not ("thou shall not kill").
So you're saying that they're all in cahoots with each other and are creating the illusion of conflict?
Why would Dennis Prager (a rabidly pro-zionist apologist) provide material that would alter the American way of thinking in a positive way?
Right, that's the cost of the 85%. There are days when I turn the dial. It's like having a beloved uncle who is just a fanatic on one topic and you just tolerate him.
In cahoots no. Predisposed to cooperate or look out for the general interest of the tribe yes.
>war on boys
Based.
Segregated schools used to be standard.
Boys only schools, girls only schools.
Maybe they knew something that we've since forgotten.
He even advocates lifestyles in direct opposition to modern day marxists. I can't resolve the two sides.
But the general interest of the tribe is to weaken the White Christian roots of America. Hence the rise in marxist thinking.
PragerU videos seem to advocate strengthening those roots.
Prager speaks often and I think sincerely about academia. Obviously this is a direct conflict with actual cultmarx academics. Think of it this way: the Jewish meta-organism recognizes that it doesn't know for sure what is best, so it keeps many irons in the fire, it sends different tentacles down different caverns.
>What side are Jews on.
Sup Forums never learns.
Will you fight for the capitalist Jew or the communist Jew? Will you fight for the Jews for Israel or the Jews against Israel? The banker Jews or the Marxist Jews? The Jews against Muslims or the Jews helping Muslims?
It's a Jew eat Jew world and you're just a levy foot soldier deciding which Jew you hate more. But in the end, all sides are run by the Jews. They've been in a civil war since god knows when and hate each other more than you can ever hate either.
That's what I'm starting to realise.
It seems like WW2 was the epitome of this fight (particularly the cold war via America vs Russia) but they united against the only non-jewish entity, The Third Reich.
He believes in "the Judeo-Christian" thing which is just a lie. He favors ecumenism and Judaism wherever there is the possibility of conflict. That still leaves plenty of room and Prager is responsible for reams of valuable material.
If you want blutsanteilung then check out Red Ice Radio and Radio 314. But I would suggest to remain open to those like Prager who are mostly right if not perfect. Red Ice is three times a week starting a few years ago; Prager has broadcasted almost every weekday for decades.
It was a temporary alliance. Now that the common enemy is dead, it's gone back to Jew v. Jew and the rest of the world are just strung along in the conflict.
I've gone to male-only and coed schools. I would pick the male-only 10,000% of the time and would never ever send any children I might have to the coed school. I plan to move back if I have kids just to send them to this one school.
It's interesting that America and Russia have reversed roles. Now America is the Marxist state and Russia is the conservative state. Why are they jumping between each other?
Our peoples and leaders are somewhat out of step though. The Trumpeting demonstrates how our people feel aboit our overconfident elites. And Putin is often held back by a surviving Soviet mindset on the part of many ordinary people who grew up in it.
Neocon kike shill. See his videos on Middle Eastern issues. Cringefest.
His foreign policy is wrong. He talks about that a quarter of the time. Can you find a flaw with the other three quarters?
I wouldn't go that far, but it's starting to head in that direction. The difficult thing is keeping cohesion. Jews might have started the Marxist Communism movement in Russia, but it was hijacked from them very early on by the likes of Stalin and Lenin's cohorts. Pretty quickly, they became the target of the very thing they started and were oppressed.
So even though Jews ushered in communism, they failed to get power in that communism. It was a colossal failure from that perspective.
This time they don't intend to make that mistake, clearly. The marxists are prepped for total control.
He likes only Americans though. He thinks Europeans are antisemitic blah blah blah
you mean its jew vs all
Venezuela the model: the people in a state of writhingly impotent rage, the elite protected by technology and mercenaries.
Yeah, on any Jewish thing Prager is obviously going to be wrong.
I'm not a social conservative, so I disagree with pretty much all of his videos, but the globalist warhawk bullshit takes it a step further.
Yes. I think of Russia as the experiment. The Soviet Union was not so much a beacon of the Jews ambitions when it comes to Marxism as much as it was a learning experience. They learned, presumably, that simply ushering in marxism wasn't enough for their desires to go through. They needed the west entirely castrated and indoctrinated, so they believe themselves increasingly, slowly but surely, socialists.
The goal is to peacefully have us destroy ourselves. Then there is no need for revolution. No need for civil war. All will be commies as is and the marxist Jews have won. The capitalist Jews I assume, just don't care about anything but their own wealth. So long as that is carefully avoided by the Marxists, they don't care what else falls to Marxism.
> provide material that would alter the American way of thinking in a positive way?
Because that's the bait. The hook is his neocon view on foreign policy. "He makes so much sense about the leftists that he must be right about Israel!", and his idiot listeners fall in line the next time a country is up for invasion.
YES
Thank you for the thread. I will summarize with the comment I left on the first video....
I can't get over the studio apron gag. Amazing. It is very similar to what banksy was trying to evoke in the movie enter the gift shop. Even though traditionalists would not approve of banksy... he makes the same point about the lack of judgement and standards in graffiti/street art. Look... people are always looking for fresh perspectives in all forms of art. Writing, Music, theatre, etc... A new idea or approach does NOT have to become the standard. It often isn't. You have to accept inferior craftsmanship as part of the dialog. Because it IS. But should it be pedestaled? Absolutely not. Its a tough debate. I am absolutely floored when I visit the MET. I am in awe of the beauty and quality of the work. In a gallery I seek something different and irreverent is fine there. I guarantee that if trends of artistic minimalism persist the pendulum will swing back. It always does. It is neither closed minded to parrot minimalism or great achievements in the craft. People need to be aware of what quality is though. If the same standards of definition applied to architecture and engineering.... buildings would collapse all the time. Cheap aesthetic is just what it sounds like. Cheap.
>Rosenberg
Sup Forums is never wrong
Here in the US we do not have much choice about hearing Jewish voices, so hearing a Jew who will sincerely and substantively criticize Jewish domestic crimes, even if he will defend the foreign policy crimes, is a big deal. It's like a great Soviet intellectual like Sakharoff using his fame and capital to criticize the government.
I don't think it works that way, more like in our system you cannot criticize Israel and be mainstream. People do not grasp how big the last Iraq war was culturally. From that alone the Jews have lost a lot of power. Like I said, you can accept some of what Prager says while rejecting other parts.
White boys started failing when you had loads of shitskins put in the classroom.
Well subverted OP
Are we just ignoring the elephant in the room here? Is this a new form of meme? Anti meme? There is artwork that involves just close up pictures of assholes
I think you're wrong.
STALIN made antisemitism punishable and purged everything religious. The Jews in charge were cultural Jews and not religious Jews.
I think there is some infighting between Marxists and orthodox Jews, however, I don't think they would kill each other. Its more of an ideological battle about how they should preserve power and use the gentiles.
I am actually Russian. And though there's a lot of information available online regarding the era of the Soviet Union, there's also a lot that simply isn't spoken of or researched in great detail because to do so would be considered racist.
Jews were regularly purged in Soviet Russia after they lost most of their influence and power in the system they ushered in. Many Jew were involved in the creation of communism, but they were indeed shoved aside. Jews in villages were killed and their wealth taken by the Black Watch ( Roughly translated. ), state-sanctioned militia that would go from village to village and aid in the ransacking of Jewish homes and murder of wealthy Jews.
Then there was the systemic anti-Jew programs put in place that allowed officials to have mandatory interviews as part of test grades in school. Thus they assured there was never a large amount of Jews allowed into top colleges, or to become doctors/scientists/etc. There were some of course, but there was a tremendous discrimination--intentionally, to ensure they could not get to high power positions again.
Lastly there was a general distrust and dislike of Jews throughout the Soviet Union. They were treated almost as bad as capitalists, because the top brass understood they were a threat and might try to take back the revolution into their hands.
On the surface, Stalin might have done as you suggest--but on the bottom line, they were very much shoved to the bottom of the totem pole and killed quite often. The stories i've heard from relatives about the Soviet Union were shocking, and only a few of them involved Jews, Tartars, Ukrainians, etc. Most involved the horrific treatment of Russians and crazy shit like 'Ghost' cities ( I was born in one. ) where they technically didn't exist and nobody was allowed to speak of them--since they were being used for special projects. That's another topic though. And I don't expect you to take my word for it.
>'Ghost' cities
Please elaborate
The amount of people capable of that kind of critical thinking has been diminishing, or maybe there haven't been that many out there in the first place. Even here, if you throw up legitimate arguments critical of Trump for example many just put their fingers in their ears and go "lalalala" while hurdling memes and insults at you.
People like Prager are in the position they are to keep the well poisoned just enough to ensure a Jewish foothold is represented on every side of the isle.
Ghost cities were Soviet cities that were not on any map and unreachable to anyone not living there or not on high-tier lists. They were usually cities that housed special development programs like weaponry, experiments, testing grounds, etc. They didn't exist, legally, so they were 'ghost' cities. People didn't go in or out without approval.
How did they lose their influence?
Internal power struggle. Stalin was brutal when he came into power, and killed anyone who could remotely challenge him. Many of the founding Marxists were slaughtered by the combined efforts of Lenin and Stalin. Many.
Lenin was Jewish.
Why would they let Stalin rise to the top? I always through Stalin was just a figurehead. Who was Stalin's allegiance pledged to? He was Russian, no? Did he have no sympathy for his people?
MFW a jewish ideology murders tons of jews too.
The 21st century is a graveyard named
"Jewish ideological utopia."
From Marx to Rand...
If this century will be otherwise I suggest non jews start rivaling the multicultural "revolution" that is currently destroying everything.
Or just get swept the fuck up in another massive murderous cluster-fuck. Its your call. I think the in on this kikery but there are suckers and suckers wive's sons born everyday.
Stalin wasn't 'allowed' to rise to the top. He was a gangster. He was the 'flaw' in the Marxist calculation--the thing they didn't expect. Someone who'd simply kill them and take over. And he did. Stalin was used as a tool at first to kill opposition and rule with an iron fist--but he turned on his masters and came out on top.
Jews may be masterminds--but they're very poor at being violent criminal masterminds. Stalin was one.
Pretty much. Jew world order is chaos.
Also, Lenin might've been Jewish, but he also purged anyone who wasn't in lock-step with him. If you were one iota more to the left than him or not left enough, you could not be left alive if you had any kind of authority or power. So Jews with even minor differences in opinion on how far communism should go were murdered. Stalin was basically a glorified mafia boss and hit man until Lenin died. Then Stalin made his move, killed the Jews that were picking up after Lenin, and took that shit right over.
And from then on Jews went from the top of the system to the very bottom.
>He was Russian, no?
no
Yeah he was Georgian. Not that it matters. He'd still be an evil SOB if he was Russian, Ukranian, or anything else.
He's alright. Too bad he's a huge military hawk.
If you are that easy to influence you shouldn't be in the business of discussing politics anyway.
lol
If you aren't willing to subsidized an artist for a year or more to make a great work then you wont get a great work.
What the fuck don't you people understand? Artists didn't change, society did. Everyone wants shit yesterday and you can't paint a giant oil painting in a day that takes at least 8 months.
Video 2 is tight as fuck. Thanks for this thread.
"Capitalism cheapens things"
Yes in the low end of consumption. People can always prefer a cheap chair from kmart. But high culture will generally always guide an educated consumer with means toward quality.